Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer

Standard

Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer. / Löser, Anastassia; Beyer, Burkhard; Carl, Cedric Oliver; Löser, Benjamin; Nagaraj, Yamini; Frenzel, Thorsten; Petersen, Cordula; Krüll, Andreas; Graefen, Markus; Schwarz, Rudolf.

In: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Vol. 195, No. 5, 05.2019, p. 374-382.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1c4a1dc3fbed4dc2be13a2e9b4ab21e3,
title = "Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a favorable treatment option in non-metastatic prostate cancer. However, reports on toxicity and outcome have mainly focused on younger patients. We aimed to determine toxicity and biochemical control rates after combined HDR-BT and EBRT in men ≥75 years.METHODS: From 1999 to 2015, 134 patients aged ≥75 years (median 76 years; 75-82 years) were identified. Patients received 18 Gy of HDR-BT (9 Gy/fraction on days 1 and 8) with an iridium-192 source. After 1 week, supplemental EBRT with a target dose of 50.4 Gy was started (delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions).RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 25 months (0-127 months). No severe (grade 4) gastrointestinal (GIT) or genitourinary (GUT) toxicities were observed. In 76 patients (56.7%), 3D conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and in 34.3% intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was applied. CRT-treated patients were at a 2.17-times higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-3.57, p = 0.002) of experiencing GUT. GIT risks could be reduced by 78% using IMRT (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.75, p = 0.015). Patients with a higher T stage (T2c-3a/b) were less likely to experience GIT or GUT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.85, p = 0.011 and HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.81, p = 0.005, respectively).CONCLUSION: HDR-BT/EBRT is a well-tolerated treatment option for elderly men ≥75 years with a limited number of comorbidities and localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. IMRT should be favored since side effects were significantly reduced in IMRT-treated patients.",
author = "Anastassia L{\"o}ser and Burkhard Beyer and Carl, {Cedric Oliver} and Benjamin L{\"o}ser and Yamini Nagaraj and Thorsten Frenzel and Cordula Petersen and Andreas Kr{\"u}ll and Markus Graefen and Rudolf Schwarz",
year = "2019",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s00066-018-1380-5",
language = "English",
volume = "195",
pages = "374--382",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer

AU - Löser, Anastassia

AU - Beyer, Burkhard

AU - Carl, Cedric Oliver

AU - Löser, Benjamin

AU - Nagaraj, Yamini

AU - Frenzel, Thorsten

AU - Petersen, Cordula

AU - Krüll, Andreas

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Schwarz, Rudolf

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - PURPOSE: Combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a favorable treatment option in non-metastatic prostate cancer. However, reports on toxicity and outcome have mainly focused on younger patients. We aimed to determine toxicity and biochemical control rates after combined HDR-BT and EBRT in men ≥75 years.METHODS: From 1999 to 2015, 134 patients aged ≥75 years (median 76 years; 75-82 years) were identified. Patients received 18 Gy of HDR-BT (9 Gy/fraction on days 1 and 8) with an iridium-192 source. After 1 week, supplemental EBRT with a target dose of 50.4 Gy was started (delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions).RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 25 months (0-127 months). No severe (grade 4) gastrointestinal (GIT) or genitourinary (GUT) toxicities were observed. In 76 patients (56.7%), 3D conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and in 34.3% intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was applied. CRT-treated patients were at a 2.17-times higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-3.57, p = 0.002) of experiencing GUT. GIT risks could be reduced by 78% using IMRT (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.75, p = 0.015). Patients with a higher T stage (T2c-3a/b) were less likely to experience GIT or GUT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.85, p = 0.011 and HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.81, p = 0.005, respectively).CONCLUSION: HDR-BT/EBRT is a well-tolerated treatment option for elderly men ≥75 years with a limited number of comorbidities and localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. IMRT should be favored since side effects were significantly reduced in IMRT-treated patients.

AB - PURPOSE: Combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a favorable treatment option in non-metastatic prostate cancer. However, reports on toxicity and outcome have mainly focused on younger patients. We aimed to determine toxicity and biochemical control rates after combined HDR-BT and EBRT in men ≥75 years.METHODS: From 1999 to 2015, 134 patients aged ≥75 years (median 76 years; 75-82 years) were identified. Patients received 18 Gy of HDR-BT (9 Gy/fraction on days 1 and 8) with an iridium-192 source. After 1 week, supplemental EBRT with a target dose of 50.4 Gy was started (delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions).RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 25 months (0-127 months). No severe (grade 4) gastrointestinal (GIT) or genitourinary (GUT) toxicities were observed. In 76 patients (56.7%), 3D conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and in 34.3% intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was applied. CRT-treated patients were at a 2.17-times higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-3.57, p = 0.002) of experiencing GUT. GIT risks could be reduced by 78% using IMRT (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07-0.75, p = 0.015). Patients with a higher T stage (T2c-3a/b) were less likely to experience GIT or GUT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.85, p = 0.011 and HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.81, p = 0.005, respectively).CONCLUSION: HDR-BT/EBRT is a well-tolerated treatment option for elderly men ≥75 years with a limited number of comorbidities and localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. IMRT should be favored since side effects were significantly reduced in IMRT-treated patients.

U2 - 10.1007/s00066-018-1380-5

DO - 10.1007/s00066-018-1380-5

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30390115

VL - 195

SP - 374

EP - 382

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 5

ER -