Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future

Standard

Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future. / Spanos, Konstantinos; Tsilimparis, Nikolaos; Rohlffs, Fiona; Wipper, Sabine; Detter, Christian; Behrendt, Christian-Alexander; Debus, Sebastian E; Kölbel, Tilo.

In: J CARDIOVASC SURG, Vol. 59, No. 4, 08.2018, p. 559-571.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Spanos K, Tsilimparis N, Rohlffs F, Wipper S, Detter C, Behrendt C-A et al. Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future. J CARDIOVASC SURG. 2018 Aug;59(4):559-571. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10412-5

Bibtex

@article{7fb0b7889bbb4fb1a03944c858f4ba07,
title = "Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the current experience on endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathologies, the feasibility and safety of the procedure.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases were searched with PRISMA methodology for published studies reporting on endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies from 2000 to 2018.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirteen non-randomized retrospective studies (either single or multicenter), two multicenter Registries and one multicenter non-randomized interventional study were included in the systematic review. The total number of patients who underwent total endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathology with either fenestrated, branched, or a combination of those devices or chimney technique was 952 patients (73%; 634/872 males, mean age ranging from 51 to 78 years). The technical success rate was 96.7% (921/952), while the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3% (32/952). The most common adverse events were endoleak type I (13.5%; 35/259), stroke (5.1%; 49/952), spinal cord ischemia (1.4%; 14/952) and retrograde dissection (1%; 8/952). During the follow-up period (mean ranging: 16.9 to 41.4 months; median ranging: 9 to 44.8 months) the total number of deaths was 31 (4.4%; 31/693). The total loss of supra-aortic vessel patency rate was 1.7% (14/803) and a re-intervention was needed in 50 patients (9%; 50/559; 11 open conversion).CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies is a feasible treatment option with good early and reasonable mid-term outcomes. This treatment modality approaches a level of maturity and may be considered as a solid alternative method of treatment.",
keywords = "Aorta, Thoracic/surgery, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Endovascular Procedures/methods, Humans, Prosthesis Design, Stents",
author = "Konstantinos Spanos and Nikolaos Tsilimparis and Fiona Rohlffs and Sabine Wipper and Christian Detter and Christian-Alexander Behrendt and Debus, {Sebastian E} and Tilo K{\"o}lbel",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
doi = "10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10412-5",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "559--571",
journal = "J CARDIOVASC SURG",
issn = "0021-9509",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future

AU - Spanos, Konstantinos

AU - Tsilimparis, Nikolaos

AU - Rohlffs, Fiona

AU - Wipper, Sabine

AU - Detter, Christian

AU - Behrendt, Christian-Alexander

AU - Debus, Sebastian E

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the current experience on endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathologies, the feasibility and safety of the procedure.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases were searched with PRISMA methodology for published studies reporting on endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies from 2000 to 2018.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirteen non-randomized retrospective studies (either single or multicenter), two multicenter Registries and one multicenter non-randomized interventional study were included in the systematic review. The total number of patients who underwent total endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathology with either fenestrated, branched, or a combination of those devices or chimney technique was 952 patients (73%; 634/872 males, mean age ranging from 51 to 78 years). The technical success rate was 96.7% (921/952), while the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3% (32/952). The most common adverse events were endoleak type I (13.5%; 35/259), stroke (5.1%; 49/952), spinal cord ischemia (1.4%; 14/952) and retrograde dissection (1%; 8/952). During the follow-up period (mean ranging: 16.9 to 41.4 months; median ranging: 9 to 44.8 months) the total number of deaths was 31 (4.4%; 31/693). The total loss of supra-aortic vessel patency rate was 1.7% (14/803) and a re-intervention was needed in 50 patients (9%; 50/559; 11 open conversion).CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies is a feasible treatment option with good early and reasonable mid-term outcomes. This treatment modality approaches a level of maturity and may be considered as a solid alternative method of treatment.

AB - INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the current experience on endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathologies, the feasibility and safety of the procedure.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases were searched with PRISMA methodology for published studies reporting on endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies from 2000 to 2018.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirteen non-randomized retrospective studies (either single or multicenter), two multicenter Registries and one multicenter non-randomized interventional study were included in the systematic review. The total number of patients who underwent total endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathology with either fenestrated, branched, or a combination of those devices or chimney technique was 952 patients (73%; 634/872 males, mean age ranging from 51 to 78 years). The technical success rate was 96.7% (921/952), while the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3% (32/952). The most common adverse events were endoleak type I (13.5%; 35/259), stroke (5.1%; 49/952), spinal cord ischemia (1.4%; 14/952) and retrograde dissection (1%; 8/952). During the follow-up period (mean ranging: 16.9 to 41.4 months; median ranging: 9 to 44.8 months) the total number of deaths was 31 (4.4%; 31/693). The total loss of supra-aortic vessel patency rate was 1.7% (14/803) and a re-intervention was needed in 50 patients (9%; 50/559; 11 open conversion).CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies is a feasible treatment option with good early and reasonable mid-term outcomes. This treatment modality approaches a level of maturity and may be considered as a solid alternative method of treatment.

KW - Aorta, Thoracic/surgery

KW - Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery

KW - Blood Vessel Prosthesis

KW - Endovascular Procedures/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Stents

U2 - 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10412-5

DO - 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10412-5

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 29355297

VL - 59

SP - 559

EP - 571

JO - J CARDIOVASC SURG

JF - J CARDIOVASC SURG

SN - 0021-9509

IS - 4

ER -