Timing of Active Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy

  • Benedikt Schrage (Shared first author)
  • Jonas Sundermeyer (Shared first author)
  • Stefan Blankenberg
  • Pascal Colson
  • Dennis Eckner
  • Matthias Eden
  • Ingo Eitel
  • Derk Frank
  • Norbert Frey
  • Tobias Graf
  • Paulus Kirchhof
  • Danny Kupka
  • Ulf Landmesser
  • Axel Linke
  • Nicolas Majunke
  • Norman Mangner
  • Octavian Maniuc
  • Johannes Mierke
  • Sven Möbius-Winkler
  • David A Morrow
  • Marc Mourad
  • Peter Nordbeck
  • Martin Orban
  • Federico Pappalardo
  • Sandeep M Patel
  • Matthias Pauschinger
  • Vittorio Pazzanese
  • Darko Radakovic
  • P Christian Schulze
  • Clemens Scherer
  • Robert H G Schwinger
  • Carsten Skurk
  • Holger Thiele
  • Anubodh Varshney
  • Lukas Wechsler
  • Dirk Westermann

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear if active left ventricular (LV) unloading should be used as a primary treatment strategy or as a bailout in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between timing of active LV unloading and implantation of VA-ECMO with outcomes of patients with CS.

METHODS: Data from 421 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and active LV unloading at 18 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of device implantation in early vs delayed active LV unloading (defined by implantation before up to 2 hours after VA-ECMO). Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between early active LV unloading and 30-day mortality as well as successful weaning from ventilation.

RESULTS: Overall, 310 (73.6%) patients with CS were treated with early active LV unloading. Early active LV unloading was associated with a lower 30-day mortality risk (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) and a higher likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.19-3.93) but not with more complications. Importantly, the relative mortality risk increased and the likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation decreased almost proportionally with the time interval between VA-ECMO implantation and (delayed) initiation of active LV unloading.

CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study lends support to the use of early active LV unloading in CS patients on VA-ECMO, although the findings need to be validated in a randomized controlled trial.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN2213-1779
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2023

Comment Deanary

Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed 36724180