Research ExplorerPublicationsThe single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of ...

The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life

Standard

The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life. / Schwindling, Franz Sebastian; Raedel, Michael; Passia, Nicole; Freitag-Wolf, Sandra; Wolfart, Stefan; Att, Wael; Mundt, Torsten; Reissmann, Daniel; Ismail, Fadi; von Königsmark, Valerie; Kern, Matthias.

In: J PROSTHODONT RES, Vol. 62, No. 3, 07.2018, p. 313-316.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Schwindling, FS, Raedel, M, Passia, N, Freitag-Wolf, S, Wolfart, S, Att, W, Mundt, T, Reissmann, D, Ismail, F, von Königsmark, V & Kern, M 2018, 'The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life', J PROSTHODONT RES, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

APA

Schwindling, F. S., Raedel, M., Passia, N., Freitag-Wolf, S., Wolfart, S., Att, W., Mundt, T., Reissmann, D., Ismail, F., von Königsmark, V., & Kern, M. (2018). The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life. J PROSTHODONT RES, 62(3), 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

Vancouver

Schwindling FS, Raedel M, Passia N, Freitag-Wolf S, Wolfart S, Att W et al. The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life. J PROSTHODONT RES. 2018 Jul;62(3):313-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

Bibtex

@article{fffd772f2205495f99db8ec537482a60,
title = "The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life",
abstract = "PURPOSE: A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing.METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 158 participants received a single mandibular implant in the midline. Quality of life was measured using the summary score of the German 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile at baseline, one month after implant placement (direct loading group) as well as one and four months after loading.RESULTS: Mean scores at baseline were comparable. Four months after implantation, a decrease of mean scores was recognized for both groups, indicating a significantly enhanced quality of life after treatment. When comparing the groups after both 1 and 4 months of loading, quality of life was insignificantly higher in the delayed loading group (1 month: 42.1 vs. 32.3; 4 months: 33.6 vs. 27.7). For immediate loading, an insignificant tendency to an earlier improvement was recognized (Δ1month-baseline: 9.7, compared to Δ1month-baseline: 6.4).CONCLUSIONS: The single mandibular implant concept was associated with a positive impact on quality of life. However, no statistically significant influence of implant loading on quality of life was found.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Schwindling, {Franz Sebastian} and Michael Raedel and Nicole Passia and Sandra Freitag-Wolf and Stefan Wolfart and Wael Att and Torsten Mundt and Daniel Reissmann and Fadi Ismail and {von K{\"o}nigsmark}, Valerie and Matthias Kern",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "313--316",
journal = "J PROSTHODONT RES",
issn = "1883-1958",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The single mandibular implant study - Short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life

AU - Schwindling, Franz Sebastian

AU - Raedel, Michael

AU - Passia, Nicole

AU - Freitag-Wolf, Sandra

AU - Wolfart, Stefan

AU - Att, Wael

AU - Mundt, Torsten

AU - Reissmann, Daniel

AU - Ismail, Fadi

AU - von Königsmark, Valerie

AU - Kern, Matthias

N1 - Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - PURPOSE: A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing.METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 158 participants received a single mandibular implant in the midline. Quality of life was measured using the summary score of the German 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile at baseline, one month after implant placement (direct loading group) as well as one and four months after loading.RESULTS: Mean scores at baseline were comparable. Four months after implantation, a decrease of mean scores was recognized for both groups, indicating a significantly enhanced quality of life after treatment. When comparing the groups after both 1 and 4 months of loading, quality of life was insignificantly higher in the delayed loading group (1 month: 42.1 vs. 32.3; 4 months: 33.6 vs. 27.7). For immediate loading, an insignificant tendency to an earlier improvement was recognized (Δ1month-baseline: 9.7, compared to Δ1month-baseline: 6.4).CONCLUSIONS: The single mandibular implant concept was associated with a positive impact on quality of life. However, no statistically significant influence of implant loading on quality of life was found.

AB - PURPOSE: A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing.METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 158 participants received a single mandibular implant in the midline. Quality of life was measured using the summary score of the German 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile at baseline, one month after implant placement (direct loading group) as well as one and four months after loading.RESULTS: Mean scores at baseline were comparable. Four months after implantation, a decrease of mean scores was recognized for both groups, indicating a significantly enhanced quality of life after treatment. When comparing the groups after both 1 and 4 months of loading, quality of life was insignificantly higher in the delayed loading group (1 month: 42.1 vs. 32.3; 4 months: 33.6 vs. 27.7). For immediate loading, an insignificant tendency to an earlier improvement was recognized (Δ1month-baseline: 9.7, compared to Δ1month-baseline: 6.4).CONCLUSIONS: The single mandibular implant concept was associated with a positive impact on quality of life. However, no statistically significant influence of implant loading on quality of life was found.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29402561

VL - 62

SP - 313

EP - 316

JO - J PROSTHODONT RES

JF - J PROSTHODONT RES

SN - 1883-1958

IS - 3

ER -