The role of transvaginal ultrasonography for detecting ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic screening population: a systematic review

Standard

The role of transvaginal ultrasonography for detecting ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic screening population: a systematic review. / Buhling, Kai J; Lezon, S; Eulenburg, C; Schmalfeldt, B.

In: ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, Vol. 295, No. 5, 05.2017, p. 1259-1268.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1cdb8a9e903b4cd581ce591320dbc595,
title = "The role of transvaginal ultrasonography for detecting ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic screening population: a systematic review",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effect of transvaginal ultrasonography in an asymptomatic female population as an annual screening procedure with regard to mortality data. Studies were evaluated descriptively on their strengths and weaknesses considering the methods and results.METHODS: We evaluated 632 international studies by selecting only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs concerning transvaginal ultrasonography were found, performed in Japan, the USA, and Great Britain.DISCUSSION: Currently, no clear recommendation for the screening for ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic population can be given based on these three studies. The authors could not show a change in mortality using transvaginal ultrasonography for annual screening.CONCLUSION: An annual palpation does not offer a beneficial effect. The development of new ultrasound machines with higher image resolution in combination with a well-standardized algorithm for ovarian cancer in upcoming years might provide an improvement regarding mortality. The current studies do not show a benefit in screening an asymptomatic population annually with transvaginal ultrasonography, but the most recent publication showed a trend toward lower mortality in patients who underwent screening after 7-14 years of follow-up. Nevertheless, all three heterogeneous RCTs had weaknesses in their methods and therefore they neither contradict the general recommendation for screening in an asymptomatic population nor do they support it.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Buhling, {Kai J} and S Lezon and C Eulenburg and B Schmalfeldt",
year = "2017",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s00404-017-4346-4",
language = "English",
volume = "295",
pages = "1259--1268",
journal = "ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET",
issn = "0932-0067",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of transvaginal ultrasonography for detecting ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic screening population: a systematic review

AU - Buhling, Kai J

AU - Lezon, S

AU - Eulenburg, C

AU - Schmalfeldt, B

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effect of transvaginal ultrasonography in an asymptomatic female population as an annual screening procedure with regard to mortality data. Studies were evaluated descriptively on their strengths and weaknesses considering the methods and results.METHODS: We evaluated 632 international studies by selecting only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs concerning transvaginal ultrasonography were found, performed in Japan, the USA, and Great Britain.DISCUSSION: Currently, no clear recommendation for the screening for ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic population can be given based on these three studies. The authors could not show a change in mortality using transvaginal ultrasonography for annual screening.CONCLUSION: An annual palpation does not offer a beneficial effect. The development of new ultrasound machines with higher image resolution in combination with a well-standardized algorithm for ovarian cancer in upcoming years might provide an improvement regarding mortality. The current studies do not show a benefit in screening an asymptomatic population annually with transvaginal ultrasonography, but the most recent publication showed a trend toward lower mortality in patients who underwent screening after 7-14 years of follow-up. Nevertheless, all three heterogeneous RCTs had weaknesses in their methods and therefore they neither contradict the general recommendation for screening in an asymptomatic population nor do they support it.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effect of transvaginal ultrasonography in an asymptomatic female population as an annual screening procedure with regard to mortality data. Studies were evaluated descriptively on their strengths and weaknesses considering the methods and results.METHODS: We evaluated 632 international studies by selecting only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs concerning transvaginal ultrasonography were found, performed in Japan, the USA, and Great Britain.DISCUSSION: Currently, no clear recommendation for the screening for ovarian cancer in an asymptomatic population can be given based on these three studies. The authors could not show a change in mortality using transvaginal ultrasonography for annual screening.CONCLUSION: An annual palpation does not offer a beneficial effect. The development of new ultrasound machines with higher image resolution in combination with a well-standardized algorithm for ovarian cancer in upcoming years might provide an improvement regarding mortality. The current studies do not show a benefit in screening an asymptomatic population annually with transvaginal ultrasonography, but the most recent publication showed a trend toward lower mortality in patients who underwent screening after 7-14 years of follow-up. Nevertheless, all three heterogeneous RCTs had weaknesses in their methods and therefore they neither contradict the general recommendation for screening in an asymptomatic population nor do they support it.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00404-017-4346-4

DO - 10.1007/s00404-017-4346-4

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28357559

VL - 295

SP - 1259

EP - 1268

JO - ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET

JF - ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET

SN - 0932-0067

IS - 5

ER -