The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment.

Standard

The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment. / Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel.

In: J OROFAC ORTHOP, Vol. 57, No. 5, 5, 1996, p. 272-287.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6070f21d892947a4abc1d6a5aa48ada6,
title = "The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment.",
abstract = "Long-term postretention assessment of orthodontically treated cases has been of interest for 5 decades; however, extraction versus nonextraction follow-up studies are difficult to compare without regard to sample structure, therapy concept und different parameters. The results of selected studies- extraction of 1 or 2 incisors, of premolars and of second and third molars, early and late extraction therapy and serial extraction-showed that long-term postretention stability is not a realistic treatment goal. The Cologne long-term records allow optimistic prediction: relative stability has been found in the majority of former patients, irrespective of the kind of treatment and treatment time. Original anomaly, type (extraction/nonextraction) and amount of treatment, and end-of-treatment alignment were found to be major factors influencing dentoalveolar and skeletal post-treatment changes. The conclusion is that therapy-induced post-treatment changes can be reduced by having a treatment goal within the anatomic limits.",
author = "B{\"a}rbel Kahl-Nieke",
year = "1996",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "57",
pages = "272--287",
journal = "J OROFAC ORTHOP",
issn = "1434-5293",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of extraction in stability of orthodontic treatment.

AU - Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Long-term postretention assessment of orthodontically treated cases has been of interest for 5 decades; however, extraction versus nonextraction follow-up studies are difficult to compare without regard to sample structure, therapy concept und different parameters. The results of selected studies- extraction of 1 or 2 incisors, of premolars and of second and third molars, early and late extraction therapy and serial extraction-showed that long-term postretention stability is not a realistic treatment goal. The Cologne long-term records allow optimistic prediction: relative stability has been found in the majority of former patients, irrespective of the kind of treatment and treatment time. Original anomaly, type (extraction/nonextraction) and amount of treatment, and end-of-treatment alignment were found to be major factors influencing dentoalveolar and skeletal post-treatment changes. The conclusion is that therapy-induced post-treatment changes can be reduced by having a treatment goal within the anatomic limits.

AB - Long-term postretention assessment of orthodontically treated cases has been of interest for 5 decades; however, extraction versus nonextraction follow-up studies are difficult to compare without regard to sample structure, therapy concept und different parameters. The results of selected studies- extraction of 1 or 2 incisors, of premolars and of second and third molars, early and late extraction therapy and serial extraction-showed that long-term postretention stability is not a realistic treatment goal. The Cologne long-term records allow optimistic prediction: relative stability has been found in the majority of former patients, irrespective of the kind of treatment and treatment time. Original anomaly, type (extraction/nonextraction) and amount of treatment, and end-of-treatment alignment were found to be major factors influencing dentoalveolar and skeletal post-treatment changes. The conclusion is that therapy-induced post-treatment changes can be reduced by having a treatment goal within the anatomic limits.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 57

SP - 272

EP - 287

JO - J OROFAC ORTHOP

JF - J OROFAC ORTHOP

SN - 1434-5293

IS - 5

M1 - 5

ER -