Research ExplorerPublicationsThe randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two...

The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years

Standard

The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years. / Kern, Jaana-Sophia; Wolfart, Stefan; Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter; Marré, Birgit; Scheller, Herbert; Strub, Jörg; Böning, Klaus; Hannak, Wolfgang; Luthardt, Ralph G; Heydecke, Guido; Huppertz, Jan; Pospiech, Peter; Wöstmann, Bernd; Stark, Helmut; Mundt, Torsten; Jahn, Florentine; Kern, Matthias; Edelhoff, Daniel; Walter, Michael H.

In: CLIN ORAL INVEST, Vol. 21, No. 6, 07.2017, p. 1945-1951.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kern, J-S, Wolfart, S, Hilgers, R-D, Marré, B, Scheller, H, Strub, J, Böning, K, Hannak, W, Luthardt, RG, Heydecke, G, Huppertz, J, Pospiech, P, Wöstmann, B, Stark, H, Mundt, T, Jahn, F, Kern, M, Edelhoff, D & Walter, MH 2017, 'The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years', CLIN ORAL INVEST, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1945-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2

APA

Kern, J-S., Wolfart, S., Hilgers, R-D., Marré, B., Scheller, H., Strub, J., Böning, K., Hannak, W., Luthardt, R. G., Heydecke, G., Huppertz, J., Pospiech, P., Wöstmann, B., Stark, H., Mundt, T., Jahn, F., Kern, M., Edelhoff, D., & Walter, M. H. (2017). The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years. CLIN ORAL INVEST, 21(6), 1945-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2

Vancouver

Kern J-S, Wolfart S, Hilgers R-D, Marré B, Scheller H, Strub J et al. The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years. CLIN ORAL INVEST. 2017 Jul;21(6):1945-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2

Bibtex

@article{1e5e971e5e4341c3ade6ae6bf2a1fa8d,
title = "The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Being a secondary outcome in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the present analysis focused on interdental spacing in the shortened dental arch (SDA). The aim was to evaluate changes in interdental spacing in dependence of two different treatments after an observation period of up to 5 years.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were either treated with a partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP) for molar replacement (PRDP group) or according to the SDA concept aiming at a premolar occlusion (SDA group) in a randomized manner. Interdental spacing in the anterior region was measured with gauges and categorized as {"}0{"} (<0.1 mm), {"}1{"} (<0.5 mm), {"}2{"} (0.5-1 mm), and {"}3{"} (>1 mm). The statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance models followed by linear contrast.RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (SDA n = 41, PRDP n = 50) were included. Changes of interdental spacing were detected in 70.7 % of all cases. A significant difference between the mean score changes was found in the mandible comparing the PRDP group and the SDA group. The respective mean score changes from baseline to 5 years were 0.23 (SD 0.49) for the PRDP group and 0.02 (SD 0.30) for the SDA group (p = 0.023).CONCLUSIONS: Major interdental spacing could be observed in neither of the groups. The SDA concept resulted in a slightly better outcome.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When deciding whether to replace missing molars, the present results give further support to the SDA concept.",
author = "Jaana-Sophia Kern and Stefan Wolfart and Ralf-Dieter Hilgers and Birgit Marr{\'e} and Herbert Scheller and J{\"o}rg Strub and Klaus B{\"o}ning and Wolfgang Hannak and Luthardt, {Ralph G} and Guido Heydecke and Jan Huppertz and Peter Pospiech and Bernd W{\"o}stmann and Helmut Stark and Torsten Mundt and Florentine Jahn and Matthias Kern and Daniel Edelhoff and Walter, {Michael H}",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1945--1951",
journal = "CLIN ORAL INVEST",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The randomized shortened dental arch study: influence of two different treatments on interdental spacing over 5 years

AU - Kern, Jaana-Sophia

AU - Wolfart, Stefan

AU - Hilgers, Ralf-Dieter

AU - Marré, Birgit

AU - Scheller, Herbert

AU - Strub, Jörg

AU - Böning, Klaus

AU - Hannak, Wolfgang

AU - Luthardt, Ralph G

AU - Heydecke, Guido

AU - Huppertz, Jan

AU - Pospiech, Peter

AU - Wöstmann, Bernd

AU - Stark, Helmut

AU - Mundt, Torsten

AU - Jahn, Florentine

AU - Kern, Matthias

AU - Edelhoff, Daniel

AU - Walter, Michael H

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Being a secondary outcome in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the present analysis focused on interdental spacing in the shortened dental arch (SDA). The aim was to evaluate changes in interdental spacing in dependence of two different treatments after an observation period of up to 5 years.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were either treated with a partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP) for molar replacement (PRDP group) or according to the SDA concept aiming at a premolar occlusion (SDA group) in a randomized manner. Interdental spacing in the anterior region was measured with gauges and categorized as "0" (<0.1 mm), "1" (<0.5 mm), "2" (0.5-1 mm), and "3" (>1 mm). The statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance models followed by linear contrast.RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (SDA n = 41, PRDP n = 50) were included. Changes of interdental spacing were detected in 70.7 % of all cases. A significant difference between the mean score changes was found in the mandible comparing the PRDP group and the SDA group. The respective mean score changes from baseline to 5 years were 0.23 (SD 0.49) for the PRDP group and 0.02 (SD 0.30) for the SDA group (p = 0.023).CONCLUSIONS: Major interdental spacing could be observed in neither of the groups. The SDA concept resulted in a slightly better outcome.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When deciding whether to replace missing molars, the present results give further support to the SDA concept.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Being a secondary outcome in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the present analysis focused on interdental spacing in the shortened dental arch (SDA). The aim was to evaluate changes in interdental spacing in dependence of two different treatments after an observation period of up to 5 years.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were either treated with a partial removable dental prosthesis (PRDP) for molar replacement (PRDP group) or according to the SDA concept aiming at a premolar occlusion (SDA group) in a randomized manner. Interdental spacing in the anterior region was measured with gauges and categorized as "0" (<0.1 mm), "1" (<0.5 mm), "2" (0.5-1 mm), and "3" (>1 mm). The statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance models followed by linear contrast.RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (SDA n = 41, PRDP n = 50) were included. Changes of interdental spacing were detected in 70.7 % of all cases. A significant difference between the mean score changes was found in the mandible comparing the PRDP group and the SDA group. The respective mean score changes from baseline to 5 years were 0.23 (SD 0.49) for the PRDP group and 0.02 (SD 0.30) for the SDA group (p = 0.023).CONCLUSIONS: Major interdental spacing could be observed in neither of the groups. The SDA concept resulted in a slightly better outcome.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When deciding whether to replace missing molars, the present results give further support to the SDA concept.

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2

DO - 10.1007/s00784-016-1981-2

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27785586

VL - 21

SP - 1945

EP - 1951

JO - CLIN ORAL INVEST

JF - CLIN ORAL INVEST

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 6

ER -