The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions.

Standard

The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions. / Buccino, Giovanni; Baumgärtner, Annette; Colle, Livia; Büchel, Christian; Rizzolatti, Giacomo; Binkofski, Ferdinand.

In: NEUROIMAGE, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2, 2007, p. 119-127.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Buccino, G, Baumgärtner, A, Colle, L, Büchel, C, Rizzolatti, G & Binkofski, F 2007, 'The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions.', NEUROIMAGE, vol. 36, no. 2, 2, pp. 119-127. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499159?dopt=Citation>

APA

Buccino, G., Baumgärtner, A., Colle, L., Büchel, C., Rizzolatti, G., & Binkofski, F. (2007). The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions. NEUROIMAGE, 36(2), 119-127. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499159?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Buccino G, Baumgärtner A, Colle L, Büchel C, Rizzolatti G, Binkofski F. The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions. NEUROIMAGE. 2007;36(2):119-127. 2.

Bibtex

@article{e6a76261dae5449a8767f4a002b33b2b,
title = "The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions.",
abstract = "We can often understand when actions done by others do or do not reflect their intentions. To investigate the neural basis of this capacity we carried out an fMRI study in which volunteers were presented with video-clips showing actions that did reflect the intention of the agent (intended actions) and actions that did not (non-intended actions). Observation of both types of actions activated a common set of areas including the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral premotor cortex and mesial premotor areas. The contrast non-intended vs. intended actions showed activation in the right temporo-parietal junction, left supramarginal gyrus, and mesial prefrontal cortex. The converse contrast did not show any activation. We conclude that our capacity to understand non intended actions is based on the activation of areas signaling unexpected events in spatial and temporal domains, in addition to the activity of the mirror neuron system. The concomitant activation of mesial prefrontal areas, known to be involved in self-referential processing, might reflect how deeply participants are involved in the observed scenes.",
author = "Giovanni Buccino and Annette Baumg{\"a}rtner and Livia Colle and Christian B{\"u}chel and Giacomo Rizzolatti and Ferdinand Binkofski",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "36",
pages = "119--127",
journal = "NEUROIMAGE",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions.

AU - Buccino, Giovanni

AU - Baumgärtner, Annette

AU - Colle, Livia

AU - Büchel, Christian

AU - Rizzolatti, Giacomo

AU - Binkofski, Ferdinand

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - We can often understand when actions done by others do or do not reflect their intentions. To investigate the neural basis of this capacity we carried out an fMRI study in which volunteers were presented with video-clips showing actions that did reflect the intention of the agent (intended actions) and actions that did not (non-intended actions). Observation of both types of actions activated a common set of areas including the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral premotor cortex and mesial premotor areas. The contrast non-intended vs. intended actions showed activation in the right temporo-parietal junction, left supramarginal gyrus, and mesial prefrontal cortex. The converse contrast did not show any activation. We conclude that our capacity to understand non intended actions is based on the activation of areas signaling unexpected events in spatial and temporal domains, in addition to the activity of the mirror neuron system. The concomitant activation of mesial prefrontal areas, known to be involved in self-referential processing, might reflect how deeply participants are involved in the observed scenes.

AB - We can often understand when actions done by others do or do not reflect their intentions. To investigate the neural basis of this capacity we carried out an fMRI study in which volunteers were presented with video-clips showing actions that did reflect the intention of the agent (intended actions) and actions that did not (non-intended actions). Observation of both types of actions activated a common set of areas including the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral premotor cortex and mesial premotor areas. The contrast non-intended vs. intended actions showed activation in the right temporo-parietal junction, left supramarginal gyrus, and mesial prefrontal cortex. The converse contrast did not show any activation. We conclude that our capacity to understand non intended actions is based on the activation of areas signaling unexpected events in spatial and temporal domains, in addition to the activity of the mirror neuron system. The concomitant activation of mesial prefrontal areas, known to be involved in self-referential processing, might reflect how deeply participants are involved in the observed scenes.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 36

SP - 119

EP - 127

JO - NEUROIMAGE

JF - NEUROIMAGE

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -