The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening

Standard

The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. / Hanske, Julian; Meyer, Christian P; Sammon, Jesse D; Choueiri, Toni K; Menon, Mani; Lipsitz, Stuart R; Noldus, Joachim; Nguyen, Paul L; Sun, Maxine; Trinh, Quoc-Dien.

In: PREV MED, Vol. 89, 08.2016, p. 140-5.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hanske, J, Meyer, CP, Sammon, JD, Choueiri, TK, Menon, M, Lipsitz, SR, Noldus, J, Nguyen, PL, Sun, M & Trinh, Q-D 2016, 'The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening', PREV MED, vol. 89, pp. 140-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017

APA

Hanske, J., Meyer, C. P., Sammon, J. D., Choueiri, T. K., Menon, M., Lipsitz, S. R., Noldus, J., Nguyen, P. L., Sun, M., & Trinh, Q-D. (2016). The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. PREV MED, 89, 140-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a1c3306c7c064c44b93d93f5ba37263b,
title = "The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To examine the impact of marital status on the use of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer.METHODS: We relied on 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey age-appropriate screening cohorts. Appropriate screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer was determined according to United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations in effect at the time of the 2012 survey. Complex samples logistic regression models were performed to examine the effect of marital status on cancer screening.RESULTS: Overall, 81.6, 83.9, and 68.9% of married participants underwent breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively, relative to 74.2, 75.1, and 60.9% for divorced/widowed/separated, individuals, and 74.7, 78.7, and 53.4% for never married individuals. Marital status (married vs. never married) was an independent predictor of screening for all cancers examined: breast cancer, odds ratio (OR): 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.61); cervical cancer, OR: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16-1.43); colorectal cancer, OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.51-1.77). Gender-specific subgroup analyses for colorectal cancer suggests that marital status may exert a greater effect in men, relative to women (married men: OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.56-1.96; married women: OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.35-1.70).CONCLUSION: Being married is associated with increased utilization of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The influence of marital status was greater in men relative to women eligible for colorectal cancer screening. Our results emphasize the importance of social determinants of health-seeking behaviors.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Julian Hanske and Meyer, {Christian P} and Sammon, {Jesse D} and Choueiri, {Toni K} and Mani Menon and Lipsitz, {Stuart R} and Joachim Noldus and Nguyen, {Paul L} and Maxine Sun and Quoc-Dien Trinh",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "140--5",
journal = "PREV MED",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening

AU - Hanske, Julian

AU - Meyer, Christian P

AU - Sammon, Jesse D

AU - Choueiri, Toni K

AU - Menon, Mani

AU - Lipsitz, Stuart R

AU - Noldus, Joachim

AU - Nguyen, Paul L

AU - Sun, Maxine

AU - Trinh, Quoc-Dien

N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - PURPOSE: To examine the impact of marital status on the use of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer.METHODS: We relied on 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey age-appropriate screening cohorts. Appropriate screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer was determined according to United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations in effect at the time of the 2012 survey. Complex samples logistic regression models were performed to examine the effect of marital status on cancer screening.RESULTS: Overall, 81.6, 83.9, and 68.9% of married participants underwent breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively, relative to 74.2, 75.1, and 60.9% for divorced/widowed/separated, individuals, and 74.7, 78.7, and 53.4% for never married individuals. Marital status (married vs. never married) was an independent predictor of screening for all cancers examined: breast cancer, odds ratio (OR): 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.61); cervical cancer, OR: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16-1.43); colorectal cancer, OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.51-1.77). Gender-specific subgroup analyses for colorectal cancer suggests that marital status may exert a greater effect in men, relative to women (married men: OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.56-1.96; married women: OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.35-1.70).CONCLUSION: Being married is associated with increased utilization of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The influence of marital status was greater in men relative to women eligible for colorectal cancer screening. Our results emphasize the importance of social determinants of health-seeking behaviors.

AB - PURPOSE: To examine the impact of marital status on the use of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer.METHODS: We relied on 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey age-appropriate screening cohorts. Appropriate screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer was determined according to United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations in effect at the time of the 2012 survey. Complex samples logistic regression models were performed to examine the effect of marital status on cancer screening.RESULTS: Overall, 81.6, 83.9, and 68.9% of married participants underwent breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively, relative to 74.2, 75.1, and 60.9% for divorced/widowed/separated, individuals, and 74.7, 78.7, and 53.4% for never married individuals. Marital status (married vs. never married) was an independent predictor of screening for all cancers examined: breast cancer, odds ratio (OR): 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.61); cervical cancer, OR: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16-1.43); colorectal cancer, OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.51-1.77). Gender-specific subgroup analyses for colorectal cancer suggests that marital status may exert a greater effect in men, relative to women (married men: OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.56-1.96; married women: OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.35-1.70).CONCLUSION: Being married is associated with increased utilization of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The influence of marital status was greater in men relative to women eligible for colorectal cancer screening. Our results emphasize the importance of social determinants of health-seeking behaviors.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.017

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27215758

VL - 89

SP - 140

EP - 145

JO - PREV MED

JF - PREV MED

SN - 0091-7435

ER -