The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center

Standard

The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center. / Messer-Hannemann, Philipp; Bätz, Johanna; Lampe, Frank; Klein, Anke; Püschel, Klaus; Campbell, Graeme M; Morlock, Michael.

In: CLIN BIOMECH, Vol. 63, 03.2019, p. 185-192.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ebb5dabbe79c437691391db4c6ea953a,
title = "The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Reaming of the acetabular cavity and cup implantation directly influence the hip rotation center and contact area between implant and bone. Previous studies have reported on an altered rotation center after total hip arthroplasty, but have not studied the influence of reaming and cup implantation separately. Aim of this study was therefore to analyze the individual influence of acetabular reaming and subsequent cup implantation on the rotation center and how this influences the contact conditions at the bone-implant interface.METHODS: Acetabular press-fit cups were implanted into the left and right hips of three full cadavers (n = 6). CT scans were performed to calculate the change in hip rotation center after reaming and prior to liner insertion. 3D models of the cups were used to determine the polar gap, the contact conditions and the effective press-fit.FINDINGS: Reaming the acetabular cavity shifted the rotation center medially (median 5.8 mm, range 4.8-9.1), superiorly (5.3 mm, 3.0-7.0) and posteriorly (2.9 mm, 1.0-5.3). With cup implantation, the rotation center shifted back towards the native position, but no full restoration was observed. The degree of shift increased with the size of polar gap (rs = 0.829, P = .042), which inversely reduced the contact area (rs = 0.886, P = .019).INTERPRETATION: This study reveals that the dominant factor in hip rotation center restoration is the reaming process, while the cup implantation for a given nominal press-fit has only a small influence. Increasing the press-fit would improve the restoration but bares the danger of insufficient bone coverage and periprosthetic fractures due to the high forces needed.",
author = "Philipp Messer-Hannemann and Johanna B{\"a}tz and Frank Lampe and Anke Klein and Klaus P{\"u}schel and Campbell, {Graeme M} and Michael Morlock",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "185--192",
journal = "CLIN BIOMECH",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center

AU - Messer-Hannemann, Philipp

AU - Bätz, Johanna

AU - Lampe, Frank

AU - Klein, Anke

AU - Püschel, Klaus

AU - Campbell, Graeme M

AU - Morlock, Michael

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Reaming of the acetabular cavity and cup implantation directly influence the hip rotation center and contact area between implant and bone. Previous studies have reported on an altered rotation center after total hip arthroplasty, but have not studied the influence of reaming and cup implantation separately. Aim of this study was therefore to analyze the individual influence of acetabular reaming and subsequent cup implantation on the rotation center and how this influences the contact conditions at the bone-implant interface.METHODS: Acetabular press-fit cups were implanted into the left and right hips of three full cadavers (n = 6). CT scans were performed to calculate the change in hip rotation center after reaming and prior to liner insertion. 3D models of the cups were used to determine the polar gap, the contact conditions and the effective press-fit.FINDINGS: Reaming the acetabular cavity shifted the rotation center medially (median 5.8 mm, range 4.8-9.1), superiorly (5.3 mm, 3.0-7.0) and posteriorly (2.9 mm, 1.0-5.3). With cup implantation, the rotation center shifted back towards the native position, but no full restoration was observed. The degree of shift increased with the size of polar gap (rs = 0.829, P = .042), which inversely reduced the contact area (rs = 0.886, P = .019).INTERPRETATION: This study reveals that the dominant factor in hip rotation center restoration is the reaming process, while the cup implantation for a given nominal press-fit has only a small influence. Increasing the press-fit would improve the restoration but bares the danger of insufficient bone coverage and periprosthetic fractures due to the high forces needed.

AB - BACKGROUND: Reaming of the acetabular cavity and cup implantation directly influence the hip rotation center and contact area between implant and bone. Previous studies have reported on an altered rotation center after total hip arthroplasty, but have not studied the influence of reaming and cup implantation separately. Aim of this study was therefore to analyze the individual influence of acetabular reaming and subsequent cup implantation on the rotation center and how this influences the contact conditions at the bone-implant interface.METHODS: Acetabular press-fit cups were implanted into the left and right hips of three full cadavers (n = 6). CT scans were performed to calculate the change in hip rotation center after reaming and prior to liner insertion. 3D models of the cups were used to determine the polar gap, the contact conditions and the effective press-fit.FINDINGS: Reaming the acetabular cavity shifted the rotation center medially (median 5.8 mm, range 4.8-9.1), superiorly (5.3 mm, 3.0-7.0) and posteriorly (2.9 mm, 1.0-5.3). With cup implantation, the rotation center shifted back towards the native position, but no full restoration was observed. The degree of shift increased with the size of polar gap (rs = 0.829, P = .042), which inversely reduced the contact area (rs = 0.886, P = .019).INTERPRETATION: This study reveals that the dominant factor in hip rotation center restoration is the reaming process, while the cup implantation for a given nominal press-fit has only a small influence. Increasing the press-fit would improve the restoration but bares the danger of insufficient bone coverage and periprosthetic fractures due to the high forces needed.

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.006

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30913461

VL - 63

SP - 185

EP - 192

JO - CLIN BIOMECH

JF - CLIN BIOMECH

SN - 0268-0033

ER -