Research ExplorerPublicationsThe effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral heal...

The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study

Standard

The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study. / Awad, Manal A; Rashid, Faahim; Feine, Jocelyne S; Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium.

In: CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 46-51.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Awad, MA, Rashid, F, Feine, JS & Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium 2014, 'The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study', CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12205

APA

Awad, M. A., Rashid, F., Feine, J. S., & Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium (2014). The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study. CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, 25(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12205

Vancouver

Awad MA, Rashid F, Feine JS, Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium. The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study. CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES. 2014 Jan 1;25(1):46-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12205

Bibtex

@article{4e095846cfec4067850d1526cf655379,
title = "The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients who received mandibular 2-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in a pragmatic international study.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, data were gathered from 203 edentulous patients (mean age, 68.8; SD: 10.4 years) at eight centres in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by 2 implants and ball attachments and opposed by conventional dentures. At baseline and at 6 months post-treatment, patients rated their oral health-related quality of life using the OHIP-20.RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the participants in the implant group in North America reported improvement in both the psychological and the handicap domains, compared to those who received conventional dentures (93% vs. 52%; P < 0.05). In South America, 100% of participants who received implant overdentures reported improvement in physical pain, compared to 66% in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Differences in mean change scores among those who expressed improvement were not significantly different between sites or treatments.CONCLUSION: Mandibular 2-implant overdentures are more likely than conventional dentures to improve OHRQL for edentulous patients. Cultural differences were also observed in the impact of implant overdentures on the different domains of the OHIP-20.",
keywords = "Aged, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible, Oral Health, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Questionnaires",
author = "Awad, {Manal A} and Faahim Rashid and Feine, {Jocelyne S} and {Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium} and Guido Heydecke",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/clr.12205",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "46--51",
journal = "CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study

AU - Awad, Manal A

AU - Rashid, Faahim

AU - Feine, Jocelyne S

AU - Overdenture Effectiveness Study Team Consortium

AU - Heydecke, Guido

N1 - © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients who received mandibular 2-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in a pragmatic international study.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, data were gathered from 203 edentulous patients (mean age, 68.8; SD: 10.4 years) at eight centres in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by 2 implants and ball attachments and opposed by conventional dentures. At baseline and at 6 months post-treatment, patients rated their oral health-related quality of life using the OHIP-20.RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the participants in the implant group in North America reported improvement in both the psychological and the handicap domains, compared to those who received conventional dentures (93% vs. 52%; P < 0.05). In South America, 100% of participants who received implant overdentures reported improvement in physical pain, compared to 66% in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Differences in mean change scores among those who expressed improvement were not significantly different between sites or treatments.CONCLUSION: Mandibular 2-implant overdentures are more likely than conventional dentures to improve OHRQL for edentulous patients. Cultural differences were also observed in the impact of implant overdentures on the different domains of the OHIP-20.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients who received mandibular 2-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in a pragmatic international study.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, data were gathered from 203 edentulous patients (mean age, 68.8; SD: 10.4 years) at eight centres in North America, South America and Europe. The patients were provided with new mandibular conventional dentures or implant overdentures supported by 2 implants and ball attachments and opposed by conventional dentures. At baseline and at 6 months post-treatment, patients rated their oral health-related quality of life using the OHIP-20.RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of the participants in the implant group in North America reported improvement in both the psychological and the handicap domains, compared to those who received conventional dentures (93% vs. 52%; P < 0.05). In South America, 100% of participants who received implant overdentures reported improvement in physical pain, compared to 66% in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Differences in mean change scores among those who expressed improvement were not significantly different between sites or treatments.CONCLUSION: Mandibular 2-implant overdentures are more likely than conventional dentures to improve OHRQL for edentulous patients. Cultural differences were also observed in the impact of implant overdentures on the different domains of the OHIP-20.

KW - Aged

KW - Dental Implants

KW - Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported

KW - Denture Retention

KW - Denture, Complete, Lower

KW - Denture, Overlay

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Mandible

KW - Oral Health

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1111/clr.12205

DO - 10.1111/clr.12205

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23735197

VL - 25

SP - 46

EP - 51

JO - CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES

JF - CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 1

ER -