The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010

Standard

The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010. / Schneider, Antonius; Großmann, Nadine; Linde, Klaus; DFG Network Clincial Trials in General Practice.

In: BMC FAM PRACT, Vol. 13, 2012, p. 58.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9853e1b4e521422dbfab085051eb49f4,
title = "The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010.METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute.RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last.CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.",
keywords = "Family Practice, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Research Report",
author = "Antonius Schneider and Nadine Gro{\ss}mann and Klaus Linde and {DFG Network Clincial Trials in General Practice}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-13-58",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "58",
journal = "BMC PRIM CARE",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of general practice as an academic discipline in Germany - an analysis of research output between 2000 and 2010

AU - Schneider, Antonius

AU - Großmann, Nadine

AU - Linde, Klaus

AU - DFG Network Clincial Trials in General Practice

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010.METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute.RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last.CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.

AB - BACKGROUND: Governmental funding support is seen as a prerequisite for the growth of research in general practice. Several funding programs in the amount of € 13.2 Mio were introduced in Germany from 2002 to February 2012. We aim to provide an overview of publications reporting original data and systematic reviews from German academic family medicine published between 2000 and 2010.METHODS: Publications were identified by searching the database Scopus and screening publication lists of family medicine divisions or institutes. Papers had to report original primary research studies or systematic reviews; at least one of the authors had to be affiliated to a German academic family medicine division or institute.RESULTS: 794 articles were included. The number of publications increased steadily starting from 107 in the period from 2000 to 2003, to 273 from 2004 to 2007, and finally to 414 from 2008 to 2010. Less than 25% were published in English in the first period. This proportion increased to 60.6% from 2008 to 2010. Articles published in a journal without impact factor decreased from 59.8% to 31.9%. Nevertheless, even in the most recent period only 31.6% of all articles were published in a journal with an impact factor above 2. The median impact factor increased from 0 in the first period to 1.2 in the last.CONCLUSIONS: The output of original research publications from academic research divisions and institutes for general practice in Germany greatly increased during the last decade. However, professionalism of German primary care research still needs to be developed.

KW - Family Practice

KW - Female

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Research Report

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-13-58

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-13-58

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22702476

VL - 13

SP - 58

JO - BMC PRIM CARE

JF - BMC PRIM CARE

SN - 1471-2296

ER -