The Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q): Development and Validation of a Patient-Based Measure for Process-Related Quality of Care in Prosthetic Dentistry

Standard

The Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q): Development and Validation of a Patient-Based Measure for Process-Related Quality of Care in Prosthetic Dentistry. / Reißmann, Daniel; Hacker, Tim; Farhan, Daniel; Heydecke, Guido.

In: INT J PROSTHODONT, Vol. 26, No. 3, 3, 2013, p. 250-259.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bc16c0a29d794453954e0fbf238857a4,
title = "The Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q): Development and Validation of a Patient-Based Measure for Process-Related Quality of Care in Prosthetic Dentistry",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in prosthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: In this nonrandomized study, the new Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q) was developed in two steps using a total of 128 prosthodontic patients in a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative-qualitative methodologies. First, the item pool for the instrument was created using semistructured interviews and a group of experts in prosthodontics. This resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Second, an assessment of redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty, and distribution of the core set of the items was performed. The final version of the BiPD-Q had psychometric core properties (reliability and validity) evaluated. Results: The BiPD-Q consisted of 25 items. Reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .87). The mean score of all items of the BiPD-Q was significantly correlated with mean perceived burdens during treatment as rated by the clinician (r = 0.26; P < .01) and with overall satisfaction with the treatment procedures as rated by patients (r = .31; P < .01), indicating sufficient convergent validity. Conclusion: A reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in prosthodontics has been developed. The BiPD-Q allows comparisons of different dental procedures within a treatment course and of different treatment providers. The use of this type of questionnaire appears to be a valuable tool for dental health care research. The outcomes of research using the BiPD-Q may result in a more pleasant treatment experience for future patients. ",
author = "Daniel Rei{\ss}mann and Tim Hacker and Daniel Farhan and Guido Heydecke",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "250--259",
journal = "INT J PROSTHODONT",
issn = "0893-2174",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q): Development and Validation of a Patient-Based Measure for Process-Related Quality of Care in Prosthetic Dentistry

AU - Reißmann, Daniel

AU - Hacker, Tim

AU - Farhan, Daniel

AU - Heydecke, Guido

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: To develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in prosthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: In this nonrandomized study, the new Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q) was developed in two steps using a total of 128 prosthodontic patients in a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative-qualitative methodologies. First, the item pool for the instrument was created using semistructured interviews and a group of experts in prosthodontics. This resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Second, an assessment of redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty, and distribution of the core set of the items was performed. The final version of the BiPD-Q had psychometric core properties (reliability and validity) evaluated. Results: The BiPD-Q consisted of 25 items. Reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .87). The mean score of all items of the BiPD-Q was significantly correlated with mean perceived burdens during treatment as rated by the clinician (r = 0.26; P < .01) and with overall satisfaction with the treatment procedures as rated by patients (r = .31; P < .01), indicating sufficient convergent validity. Conclusion: A reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in prosthodontics has been developed. The BiPD-Q allows comparisons of different dental procedures within a treatment course and of different treatment providers. The use of this type of questionnaire appears to be a valuable tool for dental health care research. The outcomes of research using the BiPD-Q may result in a more pleasant treatment experience for future patients.

AB - Purpose: To develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in prosthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: In this nonrandomized study, the new Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q) was developed in two steps using a total of 128 prosthodontic patients in a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative-qualitative methodologies. First, the item pool for the instrument was created using semistructured interviews and a group of experts in prosthodontics. This resulted in a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Second, an assessment of redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty, and distribution of the core set of the items was performed. The final version of the BiPD-Q had psychometric core properties (reliability and validity) evaluated. Results: The BiPD-Q consisted of 25 items. Reliability was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .87). The mean score of all items of the BiPD-Q was significantly correlated with mean perceived burdens during treatment as rated by the clinician (r = 0.26; P < .01) and with overall satisfaction with the treatment procedures as rated by patients (r = .31; P < .01), indicating sufficient convergent validity. Conclusion: A reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in prosthodontics has been developed. The BiPD-Q allows comparisons of different dental procedures within a treatment course and of different treatment providers. The use of this type of questionnaire appears to be a valuable tool for dental health care research. The outcomes of research using the BiPD-Q may result in a more pleasant treatment experience for future patients.

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 250

EP - 259

JO - INT J PROSTHODONT

JF - INT J PROSTHODONT

SN - 0893-2174

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -