Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation- and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation-mediated sensitivity to temozolomide in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type glioblastoma: is there a link?
Standard
Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation- and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation-mediated sensitivity to temozolomide in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type glioblastoma: is there a link? / Gramatzki, Dorothee; Felsberg, Jörg; Hentschel, Bettina; Wolter, Marietta; Schackert, Gabriele; Westphal, Manfred; Regli, Luca; Thon, Niklas; Tatagiba, Marcos; Wick, Wolfgang; Schlegel, Uwe; Krex, Dietmar; Matschke, Jakob; Roth, Patrick; Suresh, Marian P; Kamp, Marcel A; Rushing, Elisabeth J; Pietsch, Torsten; von Deimling, Andreas; Sabel, Michael; Loeffler, Markus; Weller, Michael; Reifenberger, Guido.
In: EUR J CANCER, Vol. 147, 04.2021, p. 84-94.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation- and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation-mediated sensitivity to temozolomide in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type glioblastoma: is there a link?
AU - Gramatzki, Dorothee
AU - Felsberg, Jörg
AU - Hentschel, Bettina
AU - Wolter, Marietta
AU - Schackert, Gabriele
AU - Westphal, Manfred
AU - Regli, Luca
AU - Thon, Niklas
AU - Tatagiba, Marcos
AU - Wick, Wolfgang
AU - Schlegel, Uwe
AU - Krex, Dietmar
AU - Matschke, Jakob
AU - Roth, Patrick
AU - Suresh, Marian P
AU - Kamp, Marcel A
AU - Rushing, Elisabeth J
AU - Pietsch, Torsten
AU - von Deimling, Andreas
AU - Sabel, Michael
AU - Loeffler, Markus
AU - Weller, Michael
AU - Reifenberger, Guido
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - AIM OF THE STUDY: Benefit from temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in the treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type glioblastoma is essentially limited to patients with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated tumours. Recent studies suggested that telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter hotspot mutations may have an impact on the prognostic role of the MGMT status in patients with glioblastoma.METHODS: MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutation status were retrospectively assessed in a prospective cohort of patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma of the German Glioma Network (GGN) (n = 298) and an independent retrospective cohort from Düsseldorf, Germany, and Zurich, Switzerland (n = 302).RESULTS: In the GGN cohort, but not in the Düsseldorf/Zurich cohort, TERT promoter mutation was moderately associated with inferior outcomes in patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumours (hazard ratio 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.82; p = 0.026). TERT promoter mutations were not associated with better outcomes in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumours in either cohort. The two different TERT promoter hotspot mutations (C228T and C250T) were not linked to distinct outcomes.CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of two independent cohorts of patients with glioblastoma did not confirm previous data, suggesting that TERT promoter mutations confer an enhanced benefit from TMZ in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastoma. Thus, diagnostic testing for TERT promoter mutations may not be required for prediction of TMZ sensitivity in patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma.
AB - AIM OF THE STUDY: Benefit from temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in the treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type glioblastoma is essentially limited to patients with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated tumours. Recent studies suggested that telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter hotspot mutations may have an impact on the prognostic role of the MGMT status in patients with glioblastoma.METHODS: MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutation status were retrospectively assessed in a prospective cohort of patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma of the German Glioma Network (GGN) (n = 298) and an independent retrospective cohort from Düsseldorf, Germany, and Zurich, Switzerland (n = 302).RESULTS: In the GGN cohort, but not in the Düsseldorf/Zurich cohort, TERT promoter mutation was moderately associated with inferior outcomes in patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumours (hazard ratio 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.82; p = 0.026). TERT promoter mutations were not associated with better outcomes in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumours in either cohort. The two different TERT promoter hotspot mutations (C228T and C250T) were not linked to distinct outcomes.CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of two independent cohorts of patients with glioblastoma did not confirm previous data, suggesting that TERT promoter mutations confer an enhanced benefit from TMZ in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastoma. Thus, diagnostic testing for TERT promoter mutations may not be required for prediction of TMZ sensitivity in patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.014
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 33631540
VL - 147
SP - 84
EP - 94
JO - EUR J CANCER
JF - EUR J CANCER
SN - 0959-8049
ER -