Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Standard

Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. / Penide, Joaquin; Mirza, Mahmood; McCarthy, Ray; Fiehler, Jens; Mordasini, Pasquale; Delassus, Patrick; Morris, Liam; Gilvarry, Michael.

In: CLIN NEURORADIOL, Vol. 32, No. 1, 03.2022, p. 5-12.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{32bf8d03f89d4db68ca082f69da6ce38,
title = "Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke",
abstract = "PURPOSE: In acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.METHODS: A systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.RESULTS: A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION: Failure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.",
author = "Joaquin Penide and Mahmood Mirza and Ray McCarthy and Jens Fiehler and Pasquale Mordasini and Patrick Delassus and Liam Morris and Michael Gilvarry",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s00062-021-01100-7",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "5--12",
journal = "CLIN NEURORADIOL",
issn = "1869-1439",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

AU - Penide, Joaquin

AU - Mirza, Mahmood

AU - McCarthy, Ray

AU - Fiehler, Jens

AU - Mordasini, Pasquale

AU - Delassus, Patrick

AU - Morris, Liam

AU - Gilvarry, Michael

N1 - © 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

N2 - PURPOSE: In acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.METHODS: A systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.RESULTS: A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION: Failure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.

AB - PURPOSE: In acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.METHODS: A systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.RESULTS: A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION: Failure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.

U2 - 10.1007/s00062-021-01100-7

DO - 10.1007/s00062-021-01100-7

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 34642788

VL - 32

SP - 5

EP - 12

JO - CLIN NEURORADIOL

JF - CLIN NEURORADIOL

SN - 1869-1439

IS - 1

ER -