Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Standard

Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. / Spanos, Konstantinos; Tsilimparis, Nikolaos; Larena-Avellaneda, Axel; Giannoukas, Athanasios D; Debus, Sebastian E; Kölbel, Tilo.

In: J VASC SURG, Vol. 66, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 1878-1884.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f31dc2ea9daf4806a1c0dcc6eebee912,
title = "Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is frequently caused by persistent flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and midterm efficacy of laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of endoleak.METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane databases and key references were searched with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for studies reporting on laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR.RESULTS: Eight case studies and one study of a retrospective nature were identified. In total, 20 patients (18 men; mean age, 73.6 ± 2 years; with a mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter of 64.3 ± 10 mm) who underwent post-EVAR laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for type II endoleak were analyzed. The mean time from EVAR until intervention ranged from 6 to 18 months. All but one patient were asymptomatic; in 9, the aneurysm sac was enlarged, and in 11, the endoleak was considered persistent without sac enlargement. The mean procedural duration was 99 ± 24 minutes, with technical success rate of 90% (18/20); in two cases, the patients were successfully reoperated on laparoscopically in 24 hours. The mean hospitalization was 3.6 ± 1.2 days, with 0% (0/20) perioperative and 30-day mortality. No patient underwent open conversion or showed signs of intestinal ischemia. During follow-up of 32.6 ± 12 months, 13 of 20 patients had aneurysm sac regression, whereas the rest had a stable sac diameter without evidence of persistent type II endoleak.CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR is a feasible and safe technique in specialized centers with high technical success rate and good midterm outcomes.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, Endoleak/diagnosis, Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy/adverse effects, Ligation, Male, Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/diagnostic imaging, Middle Aged, Splanchnic Circulation, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Konstantinos Spanos and Nikolaos Tsilimparis and Axel Larena-Avellaneda and Giannoukas, {Athanasios D} and Debus, {Sebastian E} and Tilo K{\"o}lbel",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.066",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "1878--1884",
journal = "J VASC SURG",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

AU - Spanos, Konstantinos

AU - Tsilimparis, Nikolaos

AU - Larena-Avellaneda, Axel

AU - Giannoukas, Athanasios D

AU - Debus, Sebastian E

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is frequently caused by persistent flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and midterm efficacy of laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of endoleak.METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane databases and key references were searched with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for studies reporting on laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR.RESULTS: Eight case studies and one study of a retrospective nature were identified. In total, 20 patients (18 men; mean age, 73.6 ± 2 years; with a mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter of 64.3 ± 10 mm) who underwent post-EVAR laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for type II endoleak were analyzed. The mean time from EVAR until intervention ranged from 6 to 18 months. All but one patient were asymptomatic; in 9, the aneurysm sac was enlarged, and in 11, the endoleak was considered persistent without sac enlargement. The mean procedural duration was 99 ± 24 minutes, with technical success rate of 90% (18/20); in two cases, the patients were successfully reoperated on laparoscopically in 24 hours. The mean hospitalization was 3.6 ± 1.2 days, with 0% (0/20) perioperative and 30-day mortality. No patient underwent open conversion or showed signs of intestinal ischemia. During follow-up of 32.6 ± 12 months, 13 of 20 patients had aneurysm sac regression, whereas the rest had a stable sac diameter without evidence of persistent type II endoleak.CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR is a feasible and safe technique in specialized centers with high technical success rate and good midterm outcomes.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is frequently caused by persistent flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and midterm efficacy of laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of endoleak.METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane databases and key references were searched with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for studies reporting on laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR.RESULTS: Eight case studies and one study of a retrospective nature were identified. In total, 20 patients (18 men; mean age, 73.6 ± 2 years; with a mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter of 64.3 ± 10 mm) who underwent post-EVAR laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for type II endoleak were analyzed. The mean time from EVAR until intervention ranged from 6 to 18 months. All but one patient were asymptomatic; in 9, the aneurysm sac was enlarged, and in 11, the endoleak was considered persistent without sac enlargement. The mean procedural duration was 99 ± 24 minutes, with technical success rate of 90% (18/20); in two cases, the patients were successfully reoperated on laparoscopically in 24 hours. The mean hospitalization was 3.6 ± 1.2 days, with 0% (0/20) perioperative and 30-day mortality. No patient underwent open conversion or showed signs of intestinal ischemia. During follow-up of 32.6 ± 12 months, 13 of 20 patients had aneurysm sac regression, whereas the rest had a stable sac diameter without evidence of persistent type II endoleak.CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR is a feasible and safe technique in specialized centers with high technical success rate and good midterm outcomes.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis

KW - Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Endoleak/diagnosis

KW - Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Laparoscopy/adverse effects

KW - Ligation

KW - Male

KW - Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/diagnostic imaging

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Splanchnic Circulation

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.066

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.066

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28822664

VL - 66

SP - 1878

EP - 1884

JO - J VASC SURG

JF - J VASC SURG

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -