Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b1f9a6e203c44d2e9d5bbfa79ae6f915,
title = "Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention.PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC) needs in patients with advanced stages of HF.METHODS: At a large tertiary care center, we enrolled HF patients in an exploratory pilot study. Symptom burden and psychosocial distress were assessed using the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System for Patients in PC) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT), respectively. The 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) was used to screen for anxiety and depression. To assess PC needs, physicians used the {"}Palliative Care Screening Tool for HF Patients{"}.RESULTS: We included 259 patients, of whom 137 (53%) were enrolled at the Heart Failure Unit (HFU), and 122 (47%) at the outpatient clinic (OC). Mean age was 63 years, 72% were male. New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms were present in 56%. With a mean 5-year survival 64% (HFU) vs. 69% (OC) calculated by the Seattle Heart Failure Model, estimated prognosis was comparatively good. Symptom burden (MIDOS score 8.0 vs. 5.4, max. 30 points, p < 0.001) and level of distress (DT score 6.0 vs. 4.8, max. 10 points, p < 0.001) were higher in hospitalised patients. Clinically relevant distress was detected in the majority of patients (HFU 76% vs. OC 57%, p = 0.001), and more than one third exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression or anxiety. Screening for PC needs revealed 82% of in- and 52% of outpatients fulfil criteria for specialized palliative support.CONCLUSION: Despite a good prognosis, we found multiple undetected and unaddressed needs in an advanced HF cohort. This study's tools and screening results may help to early explore these needs, to further improve integrated HF care.",
keywords = "Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Palliative Care/methods, Pilot Projects, Heart Failure/diagnosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anxiety/epidemiology, Quality of Life/psychology",
author = "F. Strangl and E. Ischanow and A. Ullrich and K. Oechsle and N. Fluschnik and C. Magnussen and D. Knappe and H. Grahn and S. Blankenberg and C. Bokemeyer and P. Kirchhof and M. Rybczynski",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2022. The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "CLIN RES CARDIOL",
issn = "1861-0684",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure – A cross-sectional explorative pilot study

AU - Strangl, F.

AU - Ischanow, E.

AU - Ullrich, A.

AU - Oechsle, K.

AU - Fluschnik, N.

AU - Magnussen, C.

AU - Knappe, D.

AU - Grahn, H.

AU - Blankenberg, S.

AU - Bokemeyer, C.

AU - Kirchhof, P.

AU - Rybczynski, M.

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2023/1

Y1 - 2023/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention.PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC) needs in patients with advanced stages of HF.METHODS: At a large tertiary care center, we enrolled HF patients in an exploratory pilot study. Symptom burden and psychosocial distress were assessed using the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System for Patients in PC) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT), respectively. The 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) was used to screen for anxiety and depression. To assess PC needs, physicians used the "Palliative Care Screening Tool for HF Patients".RESULTS: We included 259 patients, of whom 137 (53%) were enrolled at the Heart Failure Unit (HFU), and 122 (47%) at the outpatient clinic (OC). Mean age was 63 years, 72% were male. New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms were present in 56%. With a mean 5-year survival 64% (HFU) vs. 69% (OC) calculated by the Seattle Heart Failure Model, estimated prognosis was comparatively good. Symptom burden (MIDOS score 8.0 vs. 5.4, max. 30 points, p < 0.001) and level of distress (DT score 6.0 vs. 4.8, max. 10 points, p < 0.001) were higher in hospitalised patients. Clinically relevant distress was detected in the majority of patients (HFU 76% vs. OC 57%, p = 0.001), and more than one third exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression or anxiety. Screening for PC needs revealed 82% of in- and 52% of outpatients fulfil criteria for specialized palliative support.CONCLUSION: Despite a good prognosis, we found multiple undetected and unaddressed needs in an advanced HF cohort. This study's tools and screening results may help to early explore these needs, to further improve integrated HF care.

AB - BACKGROUND: Beyond guideline-directed treatments aimed at improving cardiac function and prognosis in heart failure (HF), patient-reported outcomes have gained attention.PURPOSE: Using a cross-sectional approach, we assessed symptom burden, psychosocial distress, and potential palliative care (PC) needs in patients with advanced stages of HF.METHODS: At a large tertiary care center, we enrolled HF patients in an exploratory pilot study. Symptom burden and psychosocial distress were assessed using the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System for Patients in PC) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT), respectively. The 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) was used to screen for anxiety and depression. To assess PC needs, physicians used the "Palliative Care Screening Tool for HF Patients".RESULTS: We included 259 patients, of whom 137 (53%) were enrolled at the Heart Failure Unit (HFU), and 122 (47%) at the outpatient clinic (OC). Mean age was 63 years, 72% were male. New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms were present in 56%. With a mean 5-year survival 64% (HFU) vs. 69% (OC) calculated by the Seattle Heart Failure Model, estimated prognosis was comparatively good. Symptom burden (MIDOS score 8.0 vs. 5.4, max. 30 points, p < 0.001) and level of distress (DT score 6.0 vs. 4.8, max. 10 points, p < 0.001) were higher in hospitalised patients. Clinically relevant distress was detected in the majority of patients (HFU 76% vs. OC 57%, p = 0.001), and more than one third exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression or anxiety. Screening for PC needs revealed 82% of in- and 52% of outpatients fulfil criteria for specialized palliative support.CONCLUSION: Despite a good prognosis, we found multiple undetected and unaddressed needs in an advanced HF cohort. This study's tools and screening results may help to early explore these needs, to further improve integrated HF care.

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Female

KW - Palliative Care/methods

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Heart Failure/diagnosis

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Anxiety/epidemiology

KW - Quality of Life/psychology

U2 - 10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y

DO - 10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35420358

VL - 112

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - CLIN RES CARDIOL

JF - CLIN RES CARDIOL

SN - 1861-0684

IS - 1

ER -