Research ExplorerPublicationsStandard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approac...

Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study.

Standard

Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study. / von Renteln, Daniel; Gutmann, T E; Schmidt, A; Vassiliou, M C; Rudolph, H U; Caca, K.

In: ENDOSCOPY, Vol. 44, No. 6, 6, 2012, p. 596-604.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

von Renteln, D, Gutmann, TE, Schmidt, A, Vassiliou, MC, Rudolph, HU & Caca, K 2012, 'Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study.', ENDOSCOPY, vol. 44, no. 6, 6, pp. 596-604. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402984?dopt=Citation>

APA

von Renteln, D., Gutmann, T. E., Schmidt, A., Vassiliou, M. C., Rudolph, H. U., & Caca, K. (2012). Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study. ENDOSCOPY, 44(6), 596-604. [6]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22402984?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

von Renteln D, Gutmann TE, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC, Rudolph HU, Caca K. Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study. ENDOSCOPY. 2012;44(6):596-604. 6.

Bibtex

@article{c3b274b58ca24bed9810149983122445,
title = "Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study.",
abstract = "The use of transluminal endoscopic access via the stomach or colon for flexible diagnostic peritoneoscopy has been proposed, although the diagnostic value of the technique has not yet been fully clarified. In this animal trial, the two main natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approaches - transgastric (TG) and transcolonic (TC) - were compared with standard transabdominal access using both rigid (TAR) and flexible instruments (TAF) for diagnostic laparoscopy.",
keywords = "Animals, Biopsy, Female, Endoscopes, Swine, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/*methods, Single-Blind Method, Laparoscopy/instrumentation/*methods, Peritoneal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/secondary, Animals, Biopsy, Female, Endoscopes, Swine, Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/*methods, Single-Blind Method, Laparoscopy/instrumentation/*methods, Peritoneal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/secondary",
author = "{von Renteln}, Daniel and Gutmann, {T E} and A Schmidt and Vassiliou, {M C} and Rudolph, {H U} and K Caca",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "596--604",
journal = "ENDOSCOPY",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standard diagnostic laparoscopy is superior to NOTES approaches: results of a blinded, randomized controlled porcine study.

AU - von Renteln, Daniel

AU - Gutmann, T E

AU - Schmidt, A

AU - Vassiliou, M C

AU - Rudolph, H U

AU - Caca, K

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The use of transluminal endoscopic access via the stomach or colon for flexible diagnostic peritoneoscopy has been proposed, although the diagnostic value of the technique has not yet been fully clarified. In this animal trial, the two main natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approaches - transgastric (TG) and transcolonic (TC) - were compared with standard transabdominal access using both rigid (TAR) and flexible instruments (TAF) for diagnostic laparoscopy.

AB - The use of transluminal endoscopic access via the stomach or colon for flexible diagnostic peritoneoscopy has been proposed, although the diagnostic value of the technique has not yet been fully clarified. In this animal trial, the two main natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approaches - transgastric (TG) and transcolonic (TC) - were compared with standard transabdominal access using both rigid (TAR) and flexible instruments (TAF) for diagnostic laparoscopy.

KW - Animals

KW - Biopsy

KW - Female

KW - Endoscopes

KW - Swine

KW - Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods

KW - Single-Blind Method

KW - Laparoscopy/instrumentation/methods

KW - Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis/pathology/secondary

KW - Animals

KW - Biopsy

KW - Female

KW - Endoscopes

KW - Swine

KW - Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods

KW - Single-Blind Method

KW - Laparoscopy/instrumentation/methods

KW - Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis/pathology/secondary

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 596

EP - 604

JO - ENDOSCOPY

JF - ENDOSCOPY

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -