Space for intuition - the 'Surprise'-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists
Standard
Space for intuition - the 'Surprise'-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists. / Gerlach, Christina; Goebel, Swantje; Weber, Sascha; Weber, Martin; Sleeman, Katherine E.
In: PALLIATIVE MED, Vol. 33, No. 5, 05.2019, p. 531-540.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Space for intuition - the 'Surprise'-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists
AU - Gerlach, Christina
AU - Goebel, Swantje
AU - Weber, Sascha
AU - Weber, Martin
AU - Sleeman, Katherine E
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Early integration of palliative care can improve outcomes for people with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses. However, prediction of survival for individuals is challenging, in particular in patients with haematological malignancies who are known to have limited access to palliative care. The 'Surprise'-Question can be used to facilitate referral to palliative care.AIM: To explore experiences, views and perceptions of haemato-oncologists on the use of the 'Surprise'-Question in the haemato-oncology outpatients clinics of a university hospital in Germany.DESIGN: A qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically based on the framework approach.SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study took place at the haemato-oncology outpatient clinic and the bone marrow transplantation outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Nine haemato-oncologists participated in qualitative interviews.RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified 4 themes and 11 subthemes: (1) meaning and relevance of the 'Surprise'-Question; (2) feasibility; (3) the concept of 'surprise' and (4) personal aspects of prognostication. A key function of the 'Surprise'-Question was to stimulate intuition and promote patient-centred goals of care by initiating a process of pause → reflection → change of perspective. It was easy and quick to use, but required time and communication skills to act on. Participants' training in palliative care enhanced their willingness to use the 'Surprise'-Question.CONCLUSION: Irrespective of its use in prognostication, the 'Surprise'-Question is a valuable tool to facilitate consideration of patient-centred goals and promote holistic care in haemato-oncology. However, prognostic uncertainty, lack of time and communication skills are barriers for integration into daily practice. Further research should involve haematology patients to integrate their needs and preferences.
AB - BACKGROUND: Early integration of palliative care can improve outcomes for people with cancer and non-cancer diagnoses. However, prediction of survival for individuals is challenging, in particular in patients with haematological malignancies who are known to have limited access to palliative care. The 'Surprise'-Question can be used to facilitate referral to palliative care.AIM: To explore experiences, views and perceptions of haemato-oncologists on the use of the 'Surprise'-Question in the haemato-oncology outpatients clinics of a university hospital in Germany.DESIGN: A qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically based on the framework approach.SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study took place at the haemato-oncology outpatient clinic and the bone marrow transplantation outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Nine haemato-oncologists participated in qualitative interviews.RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified 4 themes and 11 subthemes: (1) meaning and relevance of the 'Surprise'-Question; (2) feasibility; (3) the concept of 'surprise' and (4) personal aspects of prognostication. A key function of the 'Surprise'-Question was to stimulate intuition and promote patient-centred goals of care by initiating a process of pause → reflection → change of perspective. It was easy and quick to use, but required time and communication skills to act on. Participants' training in palliative care enhanced their willingness to use the 'Surprise'-Question.CONCLUSION: Irrespective of its use in prognostication, the 'Surprise'-Question is a valuable tool to facilitate consideration of patient-centred goals and promote holistic care in haemato-oncology. However, prognostic uncertainty, lack of time and communication skills are barriers for integration into daily practice. Further research should involve haematology patients to integrate their needs and preferences.
KW - Adult
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Decision Making
KW - Female
KW - Germany
KW - Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy
KW - Hospitals, University
KW - Humans
KW - Interviews as Topic
KW - Intuition
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Oncologists/psychology
KW - Palliative Care
KW - Prognosis
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Referral and Consultation
U2 - 10.1177/0269216318824271
DO - 10.1177/0269216318824271
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30688151
VL - 33
SP - 531
EP - 540
JO - PALLIATIVE MED
JF - PALLIATIVE MED
SN - 0269-2163
IS - 5
ER -