Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy
Standard
Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy : Toward a Frame-Based Account of Gestural Action in Multimodal Discourse. / Mittelberg, Irene; Joue, Gina.
Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. ed. / Beate Hampe. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 119-137.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to book/anthology › SCORING: Contribution to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy
T2 - Toward a Frame-Based Account of Gestural Action in Multimodal Discourse
AU - Mittelberg, Irene
AU - Joue, Gina
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This chapter starts from the observation that metaphoric understandings expressed monomodally through gesture tend to rely on “primary metaphors” (Grady 1997). Asserting that gestures draw on basic, experientially motivated, embodied construal operations, we detail how primary scenes and subscenes (Grady & Johnson 2002), image and force schemas, metonymy, and frames (Fillmore 1982) interact in situated meaning-making. We propose that by shifting the focus from object-oriented schemas, source domains, and mappings to what we call “source actions” and “embodied action frames,” we can account for the pragmatically minded nature and specific mediality of communicative gestural acts integrated in natural multimodal discourse. We argue that coverbal gestures recruit frame structures metonymically, singling out elements of “scenes“ (Fillmore 1977), especially those underpinning correlated metaphoric meanings. We back up our theoretical claims with evidence from neuroscientific studies and outline how a frame-based approach may help trace avenues for further research into embodied cognition and multimodal discourse processes.
AB - This chapter starts from the observation that metaphoric understandings expressed monomodally through gesture tend to rely on “primary metaphors” (Grady 1997). Asserting that gestures draw on basic, experientially motivated, embodied construal operations, we detail how primary scenes and subscenes (Grady & Johnson 2002), image and force schemas, metonymy, and frames (Fillmore 1982) interact in situated meaning-making. We propose that by shifting the focus from object-oriented schemas, source domains, and mappings to what we call “source actions” and “embodied action frames,” we can account for the pragmatically minded nature and specific mediality of communicative gestural acts integrated in natural multimodal discourse. We argue that coverbal gestures recruit frame structures metonymically, singling out elements of “scenes“ (Fillmore 1977), especially those underpinning correlated metaphoric meanings. We back up our theoretical claims with evidence from neuroscientific studies and outline how a frame-based approach may help trace avenues for further research into embodied cognition and multimodal discourse processes.
M3 - SCORING: Contribution to collected editions/anthologies
SN - 9781107198333
SP - 119
EP - 137
BT - Metaphor
A2 - Hampe, Beate
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -