Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis

Standard

Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis. / Beyersmann, Jan; Latouche, Aurélien; Buchholz, Anika; Schumacher, Martin.

In: STAT MED, Vol. 28, No. 6, 15.03.2009, p. 956-71.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Beyersmann, J, Latouche, A, Buchholz, A & Schumacher, M 2009, 'Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis', STAT MED, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 956-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3516

APA

Beyersmann, J., Latouche, A., Buchholz, A., & Schumacher, M. (2009). Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis. STAT MED, 28(6), 956-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3516

Vancouver

Beyersmann J, Latouche A, Buchholz A, Schumacher M. Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis. STAT MED. 2009 Mar 15;28(6):956-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3516

Bibtex

@article{6f96fde933ce473e86b316ef69f6bb91,
title = "Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis",
abstract = "Competing risks analysis considers time-to-first-event ('survival time') and the event type ('cause'), possibly subject to right-censoring. The cause-, i.e. event-specific hazards, completely determine the competing risk process, but simulation studies often fall back on the much criticized latent failure time model. Cause-specific hazard-driven simulation appears to be the exception; if done, usually only constant hazards are considered, which will be unrealistic in many medical situations. We explain simulating competing risks data based on possibly time-dependent cause-specific hazards. The simulation design is as easy as any other, relies on identifiable quantities only and adds to our understanding of the competing risks process. In addition, it immediately generalizes to more complex multistate models. We apply the proposed simulation design to computing the least false parameter of a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard model, which is a research question of independent interest in competing risks. The simulation specifications have been motivated by data on infectious complications in stem-cell transplanted patients, where results from cause-specific hazards analyses were difficult to interpret in terms of cumulative event probabilities. The simulation illustrates that results from a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard analysis can be interpreted as a time-averaged effect on the cumulative event probability scale.",
keywords = "Humans, Models, Statistical, Risk, Survival Analysis",
author = "Jan Beyersmann and Aur{\'e}lien Latouche and Anika Buchholz and Martin Schumacher",
year = "2009",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/sim.3516",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "956--71",
journal = "STAT MED",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis

AU - Beyersmann, Jan

AU - Latouche, Aurélien

AU - Buchholz, Anika

AU - Schumacher, Martin

PY - 2009/3/15

Y1 - 2009/3/15

N2 - Competing risks analysis considers time-to-first-event ('survival time') and the event type ('cause'), possibly subject to right-censoring. The cause-, i.e. event-specific hazards, completely determine the competing risk process, but simulation studies often fall back on the much criticized latent failure time model. Cause-specific hazard-driven simulation appears to be the exception; if done, usually only constant hazards are considered, which will be unrealistic in many medical situations. We explain simulating competing risks data based on possibly time-dependent cause-specific hazards. The simulation design is as easy as any other, relies on identifiable quantities only and adds to our understanding of the competing risks process. In addition, it immediately generalizes to more complex multistate models. We apply the proposed simulation design to computing the least false parameter of a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard model, which is a research question of independent interest in competing risks. The simulation specifications have been motivated by data on infectious complications in stem-cell transplanted patients, where results from cause-specific hazards analyses were difficult to interpret in terms of cumulative event probabilities. The simulation illustrates that results from a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard analysis can be interpreted as a time-averaged effect on the cumulative event probability scale.

AB - Competing risks analysis considers time-to-first-event ('survival time') and the event type ('cause'), possibly subject to right-censoring. The cause-, i.e. event-specific hazards, completely determine the competing risk process, but simulation studies often fall back on the much criticized latent failure time model. Cause-specific hazard-driven simulation appears to be the exception; if done, usually only constant hazards are considered, which will be unrealistic in many medical situations. We explain simulating competing risks data based on possibly time-dependent cause-specific hazards. The simulation design is as easy as any other, relies on identifiable quantities only and adds to our understanding of the competing risks process. In addition, it immediately generalizes to more complex multistate models. We apply the proposed simulation design to computing the least false parameter of a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard model, which is a research question of independent interest in competing risks. The simulation specifications have been motivated by data on infectious complications in stem-cell transplanted patients, where results from cause-specific hazards analyses were difficult to interpret in terms of cumulative event probabilities. The simulation illustrates that results from a misspecified proportional subdistribution hazard analysis can be interpreted as a time-averaged effect on the cumulative event probability scale.

KW - Humans

KW - Models, Statistical

KW - Risk

KW - Survival Analysis

U2 - 10.1002/sim.3516

DO - 10.1002/sim.3516

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 19125387

VL - 28

SP - 956

EP - 971

JO - STAT MED

JF - STAT MED

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 6

ER -