Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use

Standard

Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use. / Topp, Janine; Westenhöfer, Joachim; Scholl, Isabelle; Hahlweg, Pola.

In: PATIENT EDUC COUNS, Vol. 101, No. 2, 02.2018, p. 346-351.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6f25cf6f8c514617bf8781d3f2c31b38,
title = "Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study aimed a) to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) among physiotherapists in Germany, b) to explore their association with demographic characteristics, and c) to assess barriers to the implementation of SDM.METHODS: We assessed above mentioned domains using an online survey. Two-level logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use of SDM.RESULTS: 60.5% of a total sample of 357 participants reported to have had no knowledge on SDM before participating in the survey. Attitudes towards SDM were mostly positive, half of all participants expressed a preference for SDM. About two thirds of all participants reported to use a rather paternalistic approach in routine care. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of SDM were associated with several demographic characteristics.CONCLUSION: SDM was perceived as an appropriate concept in physiotherapy. However, missing knowledge and limited self-reported use of SDM in routine care on the one hand and positive attitudes towards SDM on the other hand indicate a need for action.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In order to emphasize the use of SDM in physiotherapy efforts need to be undertaken in research, clinical practice and health policy.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Janine Topp and Joachim Westenh{\"o}fer and Isabelle Scholl and Pola Hahlweg",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.031",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "346--351",
journal = "PATIENT EDUC COUNS",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use

AU - Topp, Janine

AU - Westenhöfer, Joachim

AU - Scholl, Isabelle

AU - Hahlweg, Pola

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed a) to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) among physiotherapists in Germany, b) to explore their association with demographic characteristics, and c) to assess barriers to the implementation of SDM.METHODS: We assessed above mentioned domains using an online survey. Two-level logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use of SDM.RESULTS: 60.5% of a total sample of 357 participants reported to have had no knowledge on SDM before participating in the survey. Attitudes towards SDM were mostly positive, half of all participants expressed a preference for SDM. About two thirds of all participants reported to use a rather paternalistic approach in routine care. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of SDM were associated with several demographic characteristics.CONCLUSION: SDM was perceived as an appropriate concept in physiotherapy. However, missing knowledge and limited self-reported use of SDM in routine care on the one hand and positive attitudes towards SDM on the other hand indicate a need for action.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In order to emphasize the use of SDM in physiotherapy efforts need to be undertaken in research, clinical practice and health policy.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed a) to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) among physiotherapists in Germany, b) to explore their association with demographic characteristics, and c) to assess barriers to the implementation of SDM.METHODS: We assessed above mentioned domains using an online survey. Two-level logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use of SDM.RESULTS: 60.5% of a total sample of 357 participants reported to have had no knowledge on SDM before participating in the survey. Attitudes towards SDM were mostly positive, half of all participants expressed a preference for SDM. About two thirds of all participants reported to use a rather paternalistic approach in routine care. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of SDM were associated with several demographic characteristics.CONCLUSION: SDM was perceived as an appropriate concept in physiotherapy. However, missing knowledge and limited self-reported use of SDM in routine care on the one hand and positive attitudes towards SDM on the other hand indicate a need for action.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In order to emphasize the use of SDM in physiotherapy efforts need to be undertaken in research, clinical practice and health policy.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.031

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.031

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28779911

VL - 101

SP - 346

EP - 351

JO - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

JF - PATIENT EDUC COUNS

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -