Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients

  • Markus Wallwiener
  • Sabine Riethdorf
  • Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
  • Caroline Modugno
  • Juliane Nees
  • Dharanija Madhavan
  • Martin Ronald Sprick
  • Sarah Schott
  • Christoph Domschke
  • Irène Baccelli
  • Birgitt Schönfisch
  • Barbara Burwinkel
  • Frederik Marmé
  • Jörg Heil
  • Christof Sohn
  • Klaus Pantel
  • Andreas Trumpp (Shared last author)
  • Andreas Schneeweiss (Shared last author)

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To prospectively assess circulating tumor cell (CTC) status at baseline (CTCBL) and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy (CTC1C), and changes from CTCBL to CTC1C (CTC kinetics, CTCKIN) for their utility in predicting response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS: CTCBL and CTC1C status was determined as negative (-) or positive (+) for < 5 or ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood using CellSearch™ (Veridex). CTCKIN was categorized as favorable (CTC1C-) or unfavorable (CTC1C+). Tumor response was to be assessed every 2-3 months using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Statistical analysis focused on the relation between CTC status and CTCKIN, and response, PFS, and OS.

RESULTS: 133/393 (34%) patients enrolled were CTCBL+. CTC1C status after one cycle and radiological tumor response were assessed after median (range) periods of 1.2 (0.5-3.2) and 2.9 (0.5-4.8) months, respectively. 57/201 (28%) were CTC1C+. Median [95% confidence interval] PFS and OS (months) were significantly reduced in CTCBL+ vs. CTCBL- patients (PFS 4.7 [3.7-6.1] vs. 7.8 [6.4-9.2]; OS 10.4 [7.9-15.0] vs. 27.2 [22.3-29.9]), and for CTC1C+ vs. CTC1C- patients (PFS 4.3 [3.6-6.0] vs. 8.5 [6.6-10.4]; OS 7.7 [6.4-13.9] vs. 30.6 [22.6-not available]). Unfavorable CTCKIN was significantly associated with progressive disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed prognostic factors for shorter PFS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status) and shorter OS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, bone-and-visceral/local metastases, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status).

CONCLUSIONS: CTCBL, CTC1C, and CTCKIN are predictive of outcome in MBC. Serial CTC enumeration is useful in tailoring systemic treatment of MBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN1471-2407
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11.07.2014
PubMed 25015676