Semiautomatic assessment of endothelial density and morphology in organ-cultured corneas - potential predictors for transplantation suitability and clinical outcome?

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semiautomatic assessment of endothelial density and morphology in organ-cultured corneas - potential predictors for transplantation suitability and clinical outcome?

AU - Filev, Filip

AU - Stein, Mathias

AU - Schultheiss, Maximilian

AU - Fitzek, Antonia D E

AU - Feuerstake, Jana

AU - Engel, Oliver

AU - Hellwinkel, Olaf J C

N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).

PY - 2023/9

Y1 - 2023/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: The quality of the endothelial cell layer is a major criterion for the approval of organ-cultured human donor-corneas for transplantation. We wanted to compare the predictive capacities of initial endothelial density and endothelium cell morphology for the approval of donor corneas for transplantation and for the clinical outcome after transplantation.METHODS: The endothelial density and endothelium morphology in organ culture were examined by semiautomatic assessment of 1031 donor corneas. We performed a statistical analysis for correlations of donor-data and cultivation parameters regarding their predictive capacities for the final approval of donor corneas for transplantation and the clinical outcome of 202 transplanted patients.RESULTS: Corneal endothelium cell density proved to be the only parameter with a certain predictive capacity with regard to the final decision, whether donor corneas are suitable for transplantation - however, the correlation was low (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.655). Endothelial cell morphology lacked any predictive power (AUC = 0.597). The clinical outcome regarding visual acuity seemed to be largely independent from both corneal endothelial cell density and morphology. Sub-analyses on transplanted patients stratified for their diagnoses vindicated these findings.CONCLUSIONS: Higher endothelial density (above a cut-off level of 2000 cells/mm2), as well as better endothelial morphology do not seem to be critical for transplant-corneal functionality in organ culture and up to 2 years after transplantation. Comparable long-term studies on graft survival are recommended to determine, whether the present endothelial density cut-off levels might be too stringent.

AB - BACKGROUND: The quality of the endothelial cell layer is a major criterion for the approval of organ-cultured human donor-corneas for transplantation. We wanted to compare the predictive capacities of initial endothelial density and endothelium cell morphology for the approval of donor corneas for transplantation and for the clinical outcome after transplantation.METHODS: The endothelial density and endothelium morphology in organ culture were examined by semiautomatic assessment of 1031 donor corneas. We performed a statistical analysis for correlations of donor-data and cultivation parameters regarding their predictive capacities for the final approval of donor corneas for transplantation and the clinical outcome of 202 transplanted patients.RESULTS: Corneal endothelium cell density proved to be the only parameter with a certain predictive capacity with regard to the final decision, whether donor corneas are suitable for transplantation - however, the correlation was low (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.655). Endothelial cell morphology lacked any predictive power (AUC = 0.597). The clinical outcome regarding visual acuity seemed to be largely independent from both corneal endothelial cell density and morphology. Sub-analyses on transplanted patients stratified for their diagnoses vindicated these findings.CONCLUSIONS: Higher endothelial density (above a cut-off level of 2000 cells/mm2), as well as better endothelial morphology do not seem to be critical for transplant-corneal functionality in organ culture and up to 2 years after transplantation. Comparable long-term studies on graft survival are recommended to determine, whether the present endothelial density cut-off levels might be too stringent.

U2 - 10.1007/s00417-023-06079-0

DO - 10.1007/s00417-023-06079-0

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37115267

VL - 261

SP - 2593

EP - 2602

JO - GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP

JF - GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP

SN - 0721-832X

IS - 9

ER -