Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)

Standard

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09). / Niegisch, Günter; Retz, Margitta; Thalgott, Mark; Balabanov, Stefan; Honecker, Friedemann; Ohlmann, Carsten Henning; Stöckle, Michael; Bögemann, Martin; Vom Dorp, Frank; Gschwend, Jürgen; Hartmann, Arndt; Ohmann, Christian; Albers, Peter.

In: ONCOLOGY-BASEL, Vol. 89, No. 2, 07.2015, p. 70-8.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Niegisch, G, Retz, M, Thalgott, M, Balabanov, S, Honecker, F, Ohlmann, CH, Stöckle, M, Bögemann, M, Vom Dorp, F, Gschwend, J, Hartmann, A, Ohmann, C & Albers, P 2015, 'Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)', ONCOLOGY-BASEL, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 70-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000376551

APA

Niegisch, G., Retz, M., Thalgott, M., Balabanov, S., Honecker, F., Ohlmann, C. H., Stöckle, M., Bögemann, M., Vom Dorp, F., Gschwend, J., Hartmann, A., Ohmann, C., & Albers, P. (2015). Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09). ONCOLOGY-BASEL, 89(2), 70-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000376551

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c63235f64c5e42d8b5be1dfe17b5077b,
title = "Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer is limited. Based on encouraging preclinical and clinical phase I data, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus in these patients.METHODS: In this trial, patients having failed to respond to prior platinum-based combination treatment of urothelial cancer were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus (10 mg p.o., once daily). The patients were treated until tumor progression or until a maximum of 6 cycles was completed. A one-stage design was used to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint.RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (67% male; median age 63 years) were enrolled. The most frequent grade III/IV toxicities were anemia (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), and fatigue (24%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 0/24 and 3/24 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, respectively (ORR 13%). Progression-free survival was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.9-4.2], and the median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8-10.2).CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and everolimus has not achieved the expected efficacy in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer and should not be further explored.",
author = "G{\"u}nter Niegisch and Margitta Retz and Mark Thalgott and Stefan Balabanov and Friedemann Honecker and Ohlmann, {Carsten Henning} and Michael St{\"o}ckle and Martin B{\"o}gemann and {Vom Dorp}, Frank and J{\"u}rgen Gschwend and Arndt Hartmann and Christian Ohmann and Peter Albers",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1159/000376551",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "70--8",
journal = "ONCOLOGY-BASEL",
issn = "0030-2414",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer with Paclitaxel and Everolimus in a German Phase II Trial (AUO Trial AB 35/09)

AU - Niegisch, Günter

AU - Retz, Margitta

AU - Thalgott, Mark

AU - Balabanov, Stefan

AU - Honecker, Friedemann

AU - Ohlmann, Carsten Henning

AU - Stöckle, Michael

AU - Bögemann, Martin

AU - Vom Dorp, Frank

AU - Gschwend, Jürgen

AU - Hartmann, Arndt

AU - Ohmann, Christian

AU - Albers, Peter

N1 - © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer is limited. Based on encouraging preclinical and clinical phase I data, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus in these patients.METHODS: In this trial, patients having failed to respond to prior platinum-based combination treatment of urothelial cancer were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus (10 mg p.o., once daily). The patients were treated until tumor progression or until a maximum of 6 cycles was completed. A one-stage design was used to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint.RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (67% male; median age 63 years) were enrolled. The most frequent grade III/IV toxicities were anemia (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), and fatigue (24%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 0/24 and 3/24 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, respectively (ORR 13%). Progression-free survival was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.9-4.2], and the median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8-10.2).CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and everolimus has not achieved the expected efficacy in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer and should not be further explored.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second-line treatment after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer is limited. Based on encouraging preclinical and clinical phase I data, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and everolimus in these patients.METHODS: In this trial, patients having failed to respond to prior platinum-based combination treatment of urothelial cancer were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus (10 mg p.o., once daily). The patients were treated until tumor progression or until a maximum of 6 cycles was completed. A one-stage design was used to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint.RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (67% male; median age 63 years) were enrolled. The most frequent grade III/IV toxicities were anemia (28%), peripheral neuropathy (28%), and fatigue (24%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 0/24 and 3/24 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, respectively (ORR 13%). Progression-free survival was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.9-4.2], and the median overall survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8-10.2).CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and everolimus has not achieved the expected efficacy in second-line treatment of urothelial cancer and should not be further explored.

U2 - 10.1159/000376551

DO - 10.1159/000376551

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25765871

VL - 89

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - ONCOLOGY-BASEL

JF - ONCOLOGY-BASEL

SN - 0030-2414

IS - 2

ER -