Research ExplorerPublicationsSecondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -pref...

Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh

Standard

Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh. / Nkenke, Emeka; Vairaktaris, Eleftherios; Spitzer, Martin; Kramer, Manuel; Stamminger, Marc; Holbach, Leonard; Knipfer, Christian; Stelzle, Florian.

In: ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, Vol. 13, No. 4, 20.07.2011, p. 271-7.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Transfer › peer-review

Harvard

Nkenke, E, Vairaktaris, E, Spitzer, M, Kramer, M, Stamminger, M, Holbach, L, Knipfer, C & Stelzle, F 2011, 'Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh', ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 271-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.41

APA

Nkenke, E., Vairaktaris, E., Spitzer, M., Kramer, M., Stamminger, M., Holbach, L., Knipfer, C., & Stelzle, F. (2011). Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh. ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, 13(4), 271-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.41

Vancouver

Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Spitzer M, Kramer M, Stamminger M, Holbach L et al. Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh. ARCH FACIAL PLAST S. 2011 Jul 20;13(4):271-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.41

Bibtex

@article{a2dfd81bc3cf4ce98e66b4c1e9f3a194,
title = "Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare individually prefabricated computer-assisted designed/computer-assisted manufactured (CAD/CAM) glass-bioceramic implants with nonpreformed titanium meshes for orbital floor reconstruction in secondary correction of enophthalmos.METHODS: In a nonrandomized, comparative, prospective cohort study, 2 groups of 10 patients received secondary correction of enophthalmos with CAD/CAM implants in one group and titanium meshes in the other. Relative enophthalmometry and exophthalmometry data were assessed preoperatively, at the end of the operation, at day 90 postoperatively, and at day 365 postoperatively.RESULTS: In both groups, the globe position improved significantly at the end of the operation (P = .005 in both groups). At day 90, there was a significant tendency toward relapse of enophthalmos in both groups (P = .005 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .008 in the titanium mesh group). However, the globe position did not change significantly between postoperative days 90 and 365 in both groups (P = .57 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .35 in the titanium mesh group).CONCLUSIONS: Individually prefabricated CAD/CAM glass-bioceramic implants and nonpreformed titanium meshes produce similar results in secondary enophthalmos correction. Because of higher costs, the use of CAD/CAM implants should be confined to selected cases in secondary enophthalmos correction.",
keywords = "Adult, Ceramics, Computer-Aided Design, Enophthalmos, Eye Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Prospective Studies, Prostheses and Implants, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Titanium, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Emeka Nkenke and Eleftherios Vairaktaris and Martin Spitzer and Manuel Kramer and Marc Stamminger and Leonard Holbach and Christian Knipfer and Florian Stelzle",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1001/archfacial.2011.41",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "271--7",
journal = "ARCH FACIAL PLAST S",
issn = "1521-2491",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary reconstruction of posttraumatic enophthalmos -prefabricated implants vs titanium mesh

AU - Nkenke, Emeka

AU - Vairaktaris, Eleftherios

AU - Spitzer, Martin

AU - Kramer, Manuel

AU - Stamminger, Marc

AU - Holbach, Leonard

AU - Knipfer, Christian

AU - Stelzle, Florian

PY - 2011/7/20

Y1 - 2011/7/20

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare individually prefabricated computer-assisted designed/computer-assisted manufactured (CAD/CAM) glass-bioceramic implants with nonpreformed titanium meshes for orbital floor reconstruction in secondary correction of enophthalmos.METHODS: In a nonrandomized, comparative, prospective cohort study, 2 groups of 10 patients received secondary correction of enophthalmos with CAD/CAM implants in one group and titanium meshes in the other. Relative enophthalmometry and exophthalmometry data were assessed preoperatively, at the end of the operation, at day 90 postoperatively, and at day 365 postoperatively.RESULTS: In both groups, the globe position improved significantly at the end of the operation (P = .005 in both groups). At day 90, there was a significant tendency toward relapse of enophthalmos in both groups (P = .005 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .008 in the titanium mesh group). However, the globe position did not change significantly between postoperative days 90 and 365 in both groups (P = .57 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .35 in the titanium mesh group).CONCLUSIONS: Individually prefabricated CAD/CAM glass-bioceramic implants and nonpreformed titanium meshes produce similar results in secondary enophthalmos correction. Because of higher costs, the use of CAD/CAM implants should be confined to selected cases in secondary enophthalmos correction.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare individually prefabricated computer-assisted designed/computer-assisted manufactured (CAD/CAM) glass-bioceramic implants with nonpreformed titanium meshes for orbital floor reconstruction in secondary correction of enophthalmos.METHODS: In a nonrandomized, comparative, prospective cohort study, 2 groups of 10 patients received secondary correction of enophthalmos with CAD/CAM implants in one group and titanium meshes in the other. Relative enophthalmometry and exophthalmometry data were assessed preoperatively, at the end of the operation, at day 90 postoperatively, and at day 365 postoperatively.RESULTS: In both groups, the globe position improved significantly at the end of the operation (P = .005 in both groups). At day 90, there was a significant tendency toward relapse of enophthalmos in both groups (P = .005 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .008 in the titanium mesh group). However, the globe position did not change significantly between postoperative days 90 and 365 in both groups (P = .57 in the CAD/CAM group and P = .35 in the titanium mesh group).CONCLUSIONS: Individually prefabricated CAD/CAM glass-bioceramic implants and nonpreformed titanium meshes produce similar results in secondary enophthalmos correction. Because of higher costs, the use of CAD/CAM implants should be confined to selected cases in secondary enophthalmos correction.

KW - Adult

KW - Ceramics

KW - Computer-Aided Design

KW - Enophthalmos

KW - Eye Injuries

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Prostheses and Implants

KW - Reconstructive Surgical Procedures

KW - Surgical Mesh

KW - Titanium

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Clinical Trial

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1001/archfacial.2011.41

DO - 10.1001/archfacial.2011.41

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 21768562

VL - 13

SP - 271

EP - 277

JO - ARCH FACIAL PLAST S

JF - ARCH FACIAL PLAST S

SN - 1521-2491

IS - 4

ER -