Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Standard

Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. / Suvannasankha, Attaya; Bahlis, Nizar; Trudel, Suzanne; Weisel, Katja; Koenecke, Christian; Oriol, Albert; Voorhees, Peter M; Alonso, Aranzazu A; Callander, Natalie S; Mateos, María-Victoria; Reddy, Nishitha; Hakim, Shawn; LaMacchia, John; Patel, Nashita; Williams, Danaé; Jewell, Roxanne C; Zhou, Xiangdong; Gupta, Ira; Opalinska, Joanna; Nooka, Ajay K.

In: CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, Vol. 130, No. 15, 01.08.2024, p. 2629-2641.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Suvannasankha, A, Bahlis, N, Trudel, S, Weisel, K, Koenecke, C, Oriol, A, Voorhees, PM, Alonso, AA, Callander, NS, Mateos, M-V, Reddy, N, Hakim, S, LaMacchia, J, Patel, N, Williams, D, Jewell, RC, Zhou, X, Gupta, I, Opalinska, J & Nooka, AK 2024, 'Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma', CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, vol. 130, no. 15, pp. 2629-2641. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35319

APA

Suvannasankha, A., Bahlis, N., Trudel, S., Weisel, K., Koenecke, C., Oriol, A., Voorhees, P. M., Alonso, A. A., Callander, N. S., Mateos, M-V., Reddy, N., Hakim, S., LaMacchia, J., Patel, N., Williams, D., Jewell, R. C., Zhou, X., Gupta, I., Opalinska, J., & Nooka, A. K. (2024). Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, 130(15), 2629-2641. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35319

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a88ccd9a07594a38baffd99f4d62eaa0,
title = "Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) has shown promising antimyeloma activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent. It was hypothesized that its multimodal activity may be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 pathway inhibition and activation of T cell-mediated antitumor responses. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of belamaf with pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM.METHODS: DREAMM-4 (NCT03848845) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 study divided into dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-expansion (part 2) phases. Patients were ≥18 years old with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 agent. Patients received belamaf (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg, part 1; 2.5 mg/kg, part 2) and 200 mg pembrolizumab for ≤35 cycles.RESULTS: Of 41 enrolled patients, 34 (n = 6 part 1, n = 28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab were included in this final analysis. Sixteen patients (47%) achieved an overall response. Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in three of 10 patients who had very good partial response or better. Five of eight patients who had prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapy achieved partial response or better, including two who had B-cell maturation antigen-refractory disease. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were keratopathy (38%) and thrombocytopenia (29%). Despite belamaf-related ocular events, quality-of-life measures remained stable over time. No new safety signals were observed.CONCLUSIONS: The results of DREAMM-4 demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile of belamaf plus pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. This trial is registered at www.CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT03848845.",
author = "Attaya Suvannasankha and Nizar Bahlis and Suzanne Trudel and Katja Weisel and Christian Koenecke and Albert Oriol and Voorhees, {Peter M} and Alonso, {Aranzazu A} and Callander, {Natalie S} and Mar{\'i}a-Victoria Mateos and Nishitha Reddy and Shawn Hakim and John LaMacchia and Nashita Patel and Dana{\'e} Williams and Jewell, {Roxanne C} and Xiangdong Zhou and Ira Gupta and Joanna Opalinska and Nooka, {Ajay K}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.35319",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "2629--2641",
journal = "CANCER-AM CANCER SOC",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "15",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin with pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

AU - Suvannasankha, Attaya

AU - Bahlis, Nizar

AU - Trudel, Suzanne

AU - Weisel, Katja

AU - Koenecke, Christian

AU - Oriol, Albert

AU - Voorhees, Peter M

AU - Alonso, Aranzazu A

AU - Callander, Natalie S

AU - Mateos, María-Victoria

AU - Reddy, Nishitha

AU - Hakim, Shawn

AU - LaMacchia, John

AU - Patel, Nashita

AU - Williams, Danaé

AU - Jewell, Roxanne C

AU - Zhou, Xiangdong

AU - Gupta, Ira

AU - Opalinska, Joanna

AU - Nooka, Ajay K

N1 - © 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

PY - 2024/8/1

Y1 - 2024/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) has shown promising antimyeloma activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent. It was hypothesized that its multimodal activity may be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 pathway inhibition and activation of T cell-mediated antitumor responses. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of belamaf with pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM.METHODS: DREAMM-4 (NCT03848845) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 study divided into dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-expansion (part 2) phases. Patients were ≥18 years old with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 agent. Patients received belamaf (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg, part 1; 2.5 mg/kg, part 2) and 200 mg pembrolizumab for ≤35 cycles.RESULTS: Of 41 enrolled patients, 34 (n = 6 part 1, n = 28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab were included in this final analysis. Sixteen patients (47%) achieved an overall response. Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in three of 10 patients who had very good partial response or better. Five of eight patients who had prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapy achieved partial response or better, including two who had B-cell maturation antigen-refractory disease. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were keratopathy (38%) and thrombocytopenia (29%). Despite belamaf-related ocular events, quality-of-life measures remained stable over time. No new safety signals were observed.CONCLUSIONS: The results of DREAMM-4 demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile of belamaf plus pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. This trial is registered at www.CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT03848845.

AB - BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) has shown promising antimyeloma activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent. It was hypothesized that its multimodal activity may be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 pathway inhibition and activation of T cell-mediated antitumor responses. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of belamaf with pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM.METHODS: DREAMM-4 (NCT03848845) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 study divided into dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-expansion (part 2) phases. Patients were ≥18 years old with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 agent. Patients received belamaf (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg, part 1; 2.5 mg/kg, part 2) and 200 mg pembrolizumab for ≤35 cycles.RESULTS: Of 41 enrolled patients, 34 (n = 6 part 1, n = 28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab were included in this final analysis. Sixteen patients (47%) achieved an overall response. Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in three of 10 patients who had very good partial response or better. Five of eight patients who had prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapy achieved partial response or better, including two who had B-cell maturation antigen-refractory disease. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were keratopathy (38%) and thrombocytopenia (29%). Despite belamaf-related ocular events, quality-of-life measures remained stable over time. No new safety signals were observed.CONCLUSIONS: The results of DREAMM-4 demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile of belamaf plus pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. This trial is registered at www.CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT03848845.

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.35319

DO - 10.1002/cncr.35319

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 38630908

VL - 130

SP - 2629

EP - 2641

JO - CANCER-AM CANCER SOC

JF - CANCER-AM CANCER SOC

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 15

ER -