Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia

Standard

Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia. / Frings, Andreas; Steinberg, Johannes; Druchkiv, Vasyl; Linke, Stephan J; Katz, Toam.

In: GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP, Vol. 254, No. 7, 07.2016, p. 1399-404.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Frings, A, Steinberg, J, Druchkiv, V, Linke, SJ & Katz, T 2016, 'Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia', GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP, vol. 254, no. 7, pp. 1399-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z

APA

Frings, A., Steinberg, J., Druchkiv, V., Linke, S. J., & Katz, T. (2016). Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia. GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP, 254(7), 1399-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f5693f1b63064424b3732a6f92b0ca50,
title = "Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that, to improve refractive predictability in hyperopic LASIK treatments, preoperative cycloplegic or manifest refraction, or a combination of both, could be used in the laser nomogram. We set out to investigate (1) the prevalence of a high difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent in hyperopic eyes preoperatively, and (2) the related predictability of postoperative keratometry.METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of consecutive treated 186 eyes from 186 consecutive hyperopic patients (mean age 42 [±12] years) were analyzed. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using a mechanical microkeratome (SBK, Moria, France) and an Allegretto excimer laser platform. Two groups were defined according to the difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent which was defined as ≥1.00 diopter (D); the data was analyzed according to refractive outcome in terms of refractive predictability, efficacy, and safety.RESULTS: In 24 eyes (13 %), a preoperative difference of ≥1.00D between manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (= MCD) occurred. With increasing preoperative MCD, the postoperative achieved spherical equivalent showed hyperopic regression after 3 months. There was no statistically significant effect of age (accommodation) or optical zone size on the achieved spherical equivalent.CONCLUSIONS: A difference of ≥1.00D occurs in about 13 % of hyperopia cases. We suggest that hyperopic correction should be based on the manifest spherical equivalent in eyes with preoperative MCD <1.00D. If the preoperative MCD is ≥1.00D, treatment may produce manifest undercorrection, and therefore we advise that the patient should be warrned about lower predictability, and suggest basing conclusions on the arithmetic mean calculated from the preoperative manifest and cycloplegic spheres.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Andreas Frings and Johannes Steinberg and Vasyl Druchkiv and Linke, {Stephan J} and Toam Katz",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z",
language = "English",
volume = "254",
pages = "1399--404",
journal = "GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP",
issn = "0721-832X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia

AU - Frings, Andreas

AU - Steinberg, Johannes

AU - Druchkiv, Vasyl

AU - Linke, Stephan J

AU - Katz, Toam

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that, to improve refractive predictability in hyperopic LASIK treatments, preoperative cycloplegic or manifest refraction, or a combination of both, could be used in the laser nomogram. We set out to investigate (1) the prevalence of a high difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent in hyperopic eyes preoperatively, and (2) the related predictability of postoperative keratometry.METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of consecutive treated 186 eyes from 186 consecutive hyperopic patients (mean age 42 [±12] years) were analyzed. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using a mechanical microkeratome (SBK, Moria, France) and an Allegretto excimer laser platform. Two groups were defined according to the difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent which was defined as ≥1.00 diopter (D); the data was analyzed according to refractive outcome in terms of refractive predictability, efficacy, and safety.RESULTS: In 24 eyes (13 %), a preoperative difference of ≥1.00D between manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (= MCD) occurred. With increasing preoperative MCD, the postoperative achieved spherical equivalent showed hyperopic regression after 3 months. There was no statistically significant effect of age (accommodation) or optical zone size on the achieved spherical equivalent.CONCLUSIONS: A difference of ≥1.00D occurs in about 13 % of hyperopia cases. We suggest that hyperopic correction should be based on the manifest spherical equivalent in eyes with preoperative MCD <1.00D. If the preoperative MCD is ≥1.00D, treatment may produce manifest undercorrection, and therefore we advise that the patient should be warrned about lower predictability, and suggest basing conclusions on the arithmetic mean calculated from the preoperative manifest and cycloplegic spheres.

AB - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that, to improve refractive predictability in hyperopic LASIK treatments, preoperative cycloplegic or manifest refraction, or a combination of both, could be used in the laser nomogram. We set out to investigate (1) the prevalence of a high difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent in hyperopic eyes preoperatively, and (2) the related predictability of postoperative keratometry.METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of consecutive treated 186 eyes from 186 consecutive hyperopic patients (mean age 42 [±12] years) were analyzed. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using a mechanical microkeratome (SBK, Moria, France) and an Allegretto excimer laser platform. Two groups were defined according to the difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent which was defined as ≥1.00 diopter (D); the data was analyzed according to refractive outcome in terms of refractive predictability, efficacy, and safety.RESULTS: In 24 eyes (13 %), a preoperative difference of ≥1.00D between manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (= MCD) occurred. With increasing preoperative MCD, the postoperative achieved spherical equivalent showed hyperopic regression after 3 months. There was no statistically significant effect of age (accommodation) or optical zone size on the achieved spherical equivalent.CONCLUSIONS: A difference of ≥1.00D occurs in about 13 % of hyperopia cases. We suggest that hyperopic correction should be based on the manifest spherical equivalent in eyes with preoperative MCD <1.00D. If the preoperative MCD is ≥1.00D, treatment may produce manifest undercorrection, and therefore we advise that the patient should be warrned about lower predictability, and suggest basing conclusions on the arithmetic mean calculated from the preoperative manifest and cycloplegic spheres.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z

DO - 10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26935202

VL - 254

SP - 1399

EP - 1404

JO - GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP

JF - GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP

SN - 0721-832X

IS - 7

ER -