Review of the BCI Competition IV.
Standard
Review of the BCI Competition IV. / Tangermann, Michael; Müller, Klaus-Robert; Aertsen, Ad; Birbaumer, Niels; Braun, Christoph; Brunner, Clemens; Leeb, Robert; Mehring, Carsten; Miller, Kai J; Müller-Putz, Gernot R; Nolte, Guido; Pfurtscheller, Gert; Preissl, Hubert; Schalk, Gerwin; Schlögl, Alois; Vidaurre, Carmen; Waldert, Stephan; Blankertz, Benjamin.
In: FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, Vol. 6, 2012, p. 55.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of the BCI Competition IV.
AU - Tangermann, Michael
AU - Müller, Klaus-Robert
AU - Aertsen, Ad
AU - Birbaumer, Niels
AU - Braun, Christoph
AU - Brunner, Clemens
AU - Leeb, Robert
AU - Mehring, Carsten
AU - Miller, Kai J
AU - Müller-Putz, Gernot R
AU - Nolte, Guido
AU - Pfurtscheller, Gert
AU - Preissl, Hubert
AU - Schalk, Gerwin
AU - Schlögl, Alois
AU - Vidaurre, Carmen
AU - Waldert, Stephan
AU - Blankertz, Benjamin
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students. The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) session-to-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.
AB - The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students. The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) session-to-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.
U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2012.00055
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2012.00055
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
VL - 6
SP - 55
JO - FRONT HUM NEUROSCI
JF - FRONT HUM NEUROSCI
SN - 1662-5161
ER -