Retrospective analysis of the effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker versus β-blocker on aortic root growth in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome

Standard

Retrospective analysis of the effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker versus β-blocker on aortic root growth in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome. / Mueller, Goetz C; Stierle, Lydia; Stark, Veronika; Steiner, Kristoffer; von Kodolitsch, Yskert; Weil, Jochen; Mir, Thomas S.

In: HEART, Vol. 100, No. 3, 02.2014, p. 214-218.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{20059667228342209faad761fc304b09,
title = "Retrospective analysis of the effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker versus β-blocker on aortic root growth in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular pathology, including aortic root dilation at the level of sinus of Valsalva (SV), is one of the major causes of morbidity in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). β-Blocker (BB) is well established to slow aortic dilation in MFS. Less is known about the effectiveness of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on aortic dilation in paediatric patients with MFS.METHODS: 215 patients with MFS (9.01 ± 5.7 years) were subject to a standardised diagnostic programme. Aortic root dilation was evaluated and followed up by echocardiography. In 48 cases, BB and ARB effects on aortic root dilation were evaluated. Effect of treatment was measured by comparison of z scores of SV before and after treatment initiation.RESULTS: Treatment by ARB and BB leads to significant reduction of SV dilation (p<0.05). The deviation of SV enlargement from normal as expressed by the rate of change in z scores was significantly reduced by a mean difference of -0.56 ± 0.71 z scores (p<0.001) under ARB therapy and by a mean difference of -0.35 ± 0.68 z scores (p<0.05) under BB therapy. The prophylactic effect of ARB and BB on aortic root dilation is similar in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Both concepts lead to a significant reduction of SV dilation. The effect of ARB and BB is similar. This is the first study concerning the comparison of ARB and BB in previously untreated paediatric patients with MFS. The results of the study show that both treatment strategies are beneficial in paediatric and adolescent patients.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use, Age Factors, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use, Aortic Diseases/drug therapy, Child, Child, Preschool, Dilatation, Pathologic/drug therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Marfan Syndrome/complications, Metoprolol/therapeutic use, Retrospective Studies, Tetrazoles/therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Valine/analogs & derivatives, Valsartan",
author = "Mueller, {Goetz C} and Lydia Stierle and Veronika Stark and Kristoffer Steiner and {von Kodolitsch}, Yskert and Jochen Weil and Mir, {Thomas S}",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304946",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "214--218",
journal = "HEART",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective analysis of the effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker versus β-blocker on aortic root growth in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome

AU - Mueller, Goetz C

AU - Stierle, Lydia

AU - Stark, Veronika

AU - Steiner, Kristoffer

AU - von Kodolitsch, Yskert

AU - Weil, Jochen

AU - Mir, Thomas S

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular pathology, including aortic root dilation at the level of sinus of Valsalva (SV), is one of the major causes of morbidity in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). β-Blocker (BB) is well established to slow aortic dilation in MFS. Less is known about the effectiveness of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on aortic dilation in paediatric patients with MFS.METHODS: 215 patients with MFS (9.01 ± 5.7 years) were subject to a standardised diagnostic programme. Aortic root dilation was evaluated and followed up by echocardiography. In 48 cases, BB and ARB effects on aortic root dilation were evaluated. Effect of treatment was measured by comparison of z scores of SV before and after treatment initiation.RESULTS: Treatment by ARB and BB leads to significant reduction of SV dilation (p<0.05). The deviation of SV enlargement from normal as expressed by the rate of change in z scores was significantly reduced by a mean difference of -0.56 ± 0.71 z scores (p<0.001) under ARB therapy and by a mean difference of -0.35 ± 0.68 z scores (p<0.05) under BB therapy. The prophylactic effect of ARB and BB on aortic root dilation is similar in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Both concepts lead to a significant reduction of SV dilation. The effect of ARB and BB is similar. This is the first study concerning the comparison of ARB and BB in previously untreated paediatric patients with MFS. The results of the study show that both treatment strategies are beneficial in paediatric and adolescent patients.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular pathology, including aortic root dilation at the level of sinus of Valsalva (SV), is one of the major causes of morbidity in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). β-Blocker (BB) is well established to slow aortic dilation in MFS. Less is known about the effectiveness of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on aortic dilation in paediatric patients with MFS.METHODS: 215 patients with MFS (9.01 ± 5.7 years) were subject to a standardised diagnostic programme. Aortic root dilation was evaluated and followed up by echocardiography. In 48 cases, BB and ARB effects on aortic root dilation were evaluated. Effect of treatment was measured by comparison of z scores of SV before and after treatment initiation.RESULTS: Treatment by ARB and BB leads to significant reduction of SV dilation (p<0.05). The deviation of SV enlargement from normal as expressed by the rate of change in z scores was significantly reduced by a mean difference of -0.56 ± 0.71 z scores (p<0.001) under ARB therapy and by a mean difference of -0.35 ± 0.68 z scores (p<0.05) under BB therapy. The prophylactic effect of ARB and BB on aortic root dilation is similar in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Both concepts lead to a significant reduction of SV dilation. The effect of ARB and BB is similar. This is the first study concerning the comparison of ARB and BB in previously untreated paediatric patients with MFS. The results of the study show that both treatment strategies are beneficial in paediatric and adolescent patients.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use

KW - Age Factors

KW - Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use

KW - Aortic Diseases/drug therapy

KW - Child

KW - Child, Preschool

KW - Dilatation, Pathologic/drug therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Marfan Syndrome/complications

KW - Metoprolol/therapeutic use

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Tetrazoles/therapeutic use

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Valine/analogs & derivatives

KW - Valsartan

U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304946

DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304946

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24270746

VL - 100

SP - 214

EP - 218

JO - HEART

JF - HEART

SN - 1355-6037

IS - 3

ER -