Retinal Tacks for Complicated Retinal Detachment: Retinal Tacks in the Times of Modern Small-Gauge Vitrectomy

Standard

Retinal Tacks for Complicated Retinal Detachment: Retinal Tacks in the Times of Modern Small-Gauge Vitrectomy. / Mautone, Luca; Dulz, Simon; Skevas, Christos; Schultheiss, Maximilian; Spitzer, Martin Stephan.

In: J OPHTHALMOL, Vol. 2022, 1968434, 31.03.2022.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{29ca90c216ef40f4be00ba25e565c7d3,
title = "Retinal Tacks for Complicated Retinal Detachment: Retinal Tacks in the Times of Modern Small-Gauge Vitrectomy",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety profile of retinal tacks (RTs) in cases of retinal detachment (RD) with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study medical record, optical coherence tomography and ultra-widefield fundus images of patients with complex PVR-related and RT surgery were reviewed. All cases underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), RT implantation, retinectomy, circumferential intraoperative laser retinopexy, and silicone oil tamponade.Results: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients with complex rhegmatogenous RD with PVR were included: 7 cases showed PVR grade C type P and 7 combined grades A and P. RTs were positioned at contracted, stiffened retinal areas to achieve attachment of retinectomy borders after extensive PVR peeling. Patients underwent on an average of 1.3 PPVs (range 0-3) prior RT surgery. An average of 2.5 RTs (range 1-4) were implanted. Only in a single eye, a recurrent RD occurred. In 10 eyes, the silicone oil tamponade was still in place at the last follow-up. In 5 eyes, the silicone oil could be removed without redetachment in all of these cases (average of 31.3 weeks, range 11.4-53). No RT-related intraoperative or postoperative complications like dislocation or bleedings were observed.Conclusion: RTs have the potential to improve the treatment of complex PVR-associated RD. RT can be a useful surgical tool to reattach borders of retinectomies in advanced PVR. No RT-associated complication were observed in this study.",
author = "Luca Mautone and Simon Dulz and Christos Skevas and Maximilian Schultheiss and Spitzer, {Martin Stephan}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Luca Mautone et al.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1155/2022/1968434",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
journal = "J OPHTHALMOL",
issn = "2090-004X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retinal Tacks for Complicated Retinal Detachment: Retinal Tacks in the Times of Modern Small-Gauge Vitrectomy

AU - Mautone, Luca

AU - Dulz, Simon

AU - Skevas, Christos

AU - Schultheiss, Maximilian

AU - Spitzer, Martin Stephan

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Luca Mautone et al.

PY - 2022/3/31

Y1 - 2022/3/31

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety profile of retinal tacks (RTs) in cases of retinal detachment (RD) with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study medical record, optical coherence tomography and ultra-widefield fundus images of patients with complex PVR-related and RT surgery were reviewed. All cases underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), RT implantation, retinectomy, circumferential intraoperative laser retinopexy, and silicone oil tamponade.Results: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients with complex rhegmatogenous RD with PVR were included: 7 cases showed PVR grade C type P and 7 combined grades A and P. RTs were positioned at contracted, stiffened retinal areas to achieve attachment of retinectomy borders after extensive PVR peeling. Patients underwent on an average of 1.3 PPVs (range 0-3) prior RT surgery. An average of 2.5 RTs (range 1-4) were implanted. Only in a single eye, a recurrent RD occurred. In 10 eyes, the silicone oil tamponade was still in place at the last follow-up. In 5 eyes, the silicone oil could be removed without redetachment in all of these cases (average of 31.3 weeks, range 11.4-53). No RT-related intraoperative or postoperative complications like dislocation or bleedings were observed.Conclusion: RTs have the potential to improve the treatment of complex PVR-associated RD. RT can be a useful surgical tool to reattach borders of retinectomies in advanced PVR. No RT-associated complication were observed in this study.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety profile of retinal tacks (RTs) in cases of retinal detachment (RD) with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study medical record, optical coherence tomography and ultra-widefield fundus images of patients with complex PVR-related and RT surgery were reviewed. All cases underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), RT implantation, retinectomy, circumferential intraoperative laser retinopexy, and silicone oil tamponade.Results: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients with complex rhegmatogenous RD with PVR were included: 7 cases showed PVR grade C type P and 7 combined grades A and P. RTs were positioned at contracted, stiffened retinal areas to achieve attachment of retinectomy borders after extensive PVR peeling. Patients underwent on an average of 1.3 PPVs (range 0-3) prior RT surgery. An average of 2.5 RTs (range 1-4) were implanted. Only in a single eye, a recurrent RD occurred. In 10 eyes, the silicone oil tamponade was still in place at the last follow-up. In 5 eyes, the silicone oil could be removed without redetachment in all of these cases (average of 31.3 weeks, range 11.4-53). No RT-related intraoperative or postoperative complications like dislocation or bleedings were observed.Conclusion: RTs have the potential to improve the treatment of complex PVR-associated RD. RT can be a useful surgical tool to reattach borders of retinectomies in advanced PVR. No RT-associated complication were observed in this study.

U2 - 10.1155/2022/1968434

DO - 10.1155/2022/1968434

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35399160

VL - 2022

JO - J OPHTHALMOL

JF - J OPHTHALMOL

SN - 2090-004X

M1 - 1968434

ER -