Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time

Standard

Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time. / Richter, Martinus; Lintz, Francois; de Cesar Netto, Cesar; Barg, Alexej; Burssens, Arne.

In: FOOT ANKLE SURG, Vol. 26, No. 5, 07.2020, p. 518-522.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7b98617bf8e7415aa0fe89959be7b6b3,
title = "Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness.METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group).RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups.CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Joint Diseases/diagnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Radiation Exposure/economics, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics, Weight-Bearing/physiology, Young Adult",
author = "Martinus Richter and Francois Lintz and {de Cesar Netto}, Cesar and Alexej Barg and Arne Burssens",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "518--522",
journal = "FOOT ANKLE SURG",
issn = "1268-7731",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time

AU - Richter, Martinus

AU - Lintz, Francois

AU - de Cesar Netto, Cesar

AU - Barg, Alexej

AU - Burssens, Arne

N1 - Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness.METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group).RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups.CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.

AB - BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness.METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group).RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups.CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging

KW - Child

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Joint Diseases/diagnosis

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Radiation Exposure/economics

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics

KW - Weight-Bearing/physiology

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.019

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31239196

VL - 26

SP - 518

EP - 522

JO - FOOT ANKLE SURG

JF - FOOT ANKLE SURG

SN - 1268-7731

IS - 5

ER -