Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial)

Standard

Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial). / Wiegel, Thomas; Albers, Peter; Bartkowiak, Detlef; Bussar-Maatz, Roswitha; Härter, Martin; Kristiansen, Glen; Martus, Peter; Wellek, Stefan; Schmidberger, Heinz; Grozinger, Klaus; Renner, Peter; Schneider, Fried; Burmester, Martin; Stöckle, Michael.

In: J CANCER RES CLIN, Vol. 147, No. 1, 01.2021, p. 235-242.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wiegel, T, Albers, P, Bartkowiak, D, Bussar-Maatz, R, Härter, M, Kristiansen, G, Martus, P, Wellek, S, Schmidberger, H, Grozinger, K, Renner, P, Schneider, F, Burmester, M & Stöckle, M 2021, 'Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial)', J CANCER RES CLIN, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03327-2

APA

Wiegel, T., Albers, P., Bartkowiak, D., Bussar-Maatz, R., Härter, M., Kristiansen, G., Martus, P., Wellek, S., Schmidberger, H., Grozinger, K., Renner, P., Schneider, F., Burmester, M., & Stöckle, M. (2021). Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial). J CANCER RES CLIN, 147(1), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03327-2

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{946383258db049a985d05f8752ff7b79,
title = "Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial)",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for patients with low to early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be defined. The randomized PREFERE trial (DRKS00004405) aimed to assess noninferiority of active surveillance (AS), external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation (PSI) vs. radical prostatectomy (RP) for these patients.METHODS: PREFERE was planned to enroll 7600 patients. The primary endpoint was disease specific survival. Patients with PCa stage ≤ cT2a, cN0/X, M0, PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml and Gleason-Score ≤ 3 + 4 at reference pathology were eligible. Patients were allowed to exclude one or two of the four modalities, which yielded eleven combinations for randomization. Sixty-nine German study centers were engaged in PREFERE.RESULTS: Of 2251 patients prescreened between 2012 and 2016, 459 agreed to participate in PREFERE. Due to this poor accrual, the trial was stopped. In 345 patients reference pathology confirmed inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine men were assigned to RP, 53 to EBRT, 93 to PSI, and 130 to AS. Forty patients changed treatment shortly after randomization, 21 to AS. Forty-eight AS patients with follow-up received radical treatment. Median follow-up was 19 months. Five patients died, none due to PCa; 8 had biochemical progression after radical therapy. Treatment-related acute grade 3 toxicity was reported in 3 RP patients and 2 PSI patients.CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely closed trial, we observed an unexpected high rate of termination of AS and an increased toxicity related to PSI. Patients hesitated to be randomized in a multi-arm trial. The optimal treatment of low and early-intermediate risk PCa remains unclear.",
author = "Thomas Wiegel and Peter Albers and Detlef Bartkowiak and Roswitha Bussar-Maatz and Martin H{\"a}rter and Glen Kristiansen and Peter Martus and Stefan Wellek and Heinz Schmidberger and Klaus Grozinger and Peter Renner and Fried Schneider and Martin Burmester and Michael St{\"o}ckle",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s00432-020-03327-2",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
pages = "235--242",
journal = "J CANCER RES CLIN",
issn = "0171-5216",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of a randomized trial of treatment modalities in patients with low or early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PREFERE trial)

AU - Wiegel, Thomas

AU - Albers, Peter

AU - Bartkowiak, Detlef

AU - Bussar-Maatz, Roswitha

AU - Härter, Martin

AU - Kristiansen, Glen

AU - Martus, Peter

AU - Wellek, Stefan

AU - Schmidberger, Heinz

AU - Grozinger, Klaus

AU - Renner, Peter

AU - Schneider, Fried

AU - Burmester, Martin

AU - Stöckle, Michael

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for patients with low to early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be defined. The randomized PREFERE trial (DRKS00004405) aimed to assess noninferiority of active surveillance (AS), external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation (PSI) vs. radical prostatectomy (RP) for these patients.METHODS: PREFERE was planned to enroll 7600 patients. The primary endpoint was disease specific survival. Patients with PCa stage ≤ cT2a, cN0/X, M0, PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml and Gleason-Score ≤ 3 + 4 at reference pathology were eligible. Patients were allowed to exclude one or two of the four modalities, which yielded eleven combinations for randomization. Sixty-nine German study centers were engaged in PREFERE.RESULTS: Of 2251 patients prescreened between 2012 and 2016, 459 agreed to participate in PREFERE. Due to this poor accrual, the trial was stopped. In 345 patients reference pathology confirmed inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine men were assigned to RP, 53 to EBRT, 93 to PSI, and 130 to AS. Forty patients changed treatment shortly after randomization, 21 to AS. Forty-eight AS patients with follow-up received radical treatment. Median follow-up was 19 months. Five patients died, none due to PCa; 8 had biochemical progression after radical therapy. Treatment-related acute grade 3 toxicity was reported in 3 RP patients and 2 PSI patients.CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely closed trial, we observed an unexpected high rate of termination of AS and an increased toxicity related to PSI. Patients hesitated to be randomized in a multi-arm trial. The optimal treatment of low and early-intermediate risk PCa remains unclear.

AB - PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for patients with low to early-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be defined. The randomized PREFERE trial (DRKS00004405) aimed to assess noninferiority of active surveillance (AS), external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation (PSI) vs. radical prostatectomy (RP) for these patients.METHODS: PREFERE was planned to enroll 7600 patients. The primary endpoint was disease specific survival. Patients with PCa stage ≤ cT2a, cN0/X, M0, PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml and Gleason-Score ≤ 3 + 4 at reference pathology were eligible. Patients were allowed to exclude one or two of the four modalities, which yielded eleven combinations for randomization. Sixty-nine German study centers were engaged in PREFERE.RESULTS: Of 2251 patients prescreened between 2012 and 2016, 459 agreed to participate in PREFERE. Due to this poor accrual, the trial was stopped. In 345 patients reference pathology confirmed inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine men were assigned to RP, 53 to EBRT, 93 to PSI, and 130 to AS. Forty patients changed treatment shortly after randomization, 21 to AS. Forty-eight AS patients with follow-up received radical treatment. Median follow-up was 19 months. Five patients died, none due to PCa; 8 had biochemical progression after radical therapy. Treatment-related acute grade 3 toxicity was reported in 3 RP patients and 2 PSI patients.CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely closed trial, we observed an unexpected high rate of termination of AS and an increased toxicity related to PSI. Patients hesitated to be randomized in a multi-arm trial. The optimal treatment of low and early-intermediate risk PCa remains unclear.

U2 - 10.1007/s00432-020-03327-2

DO - 10.1007/s00432-020-03327-2

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32886212

VL - 147

SP - 235

EP - 242

JO - J CANCER RES CLIN

JF - J CANCER RES CLIN

SN - 0171-5216

IS - 1

ER -