Reply to: "Both tacrolimus and mycophenylate mophetil should be considered second-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis"

Standard

Reply to: "Both tacrolimus and mycophenylate mophetil should be considered second-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis". / Lohse, Ansgar W; Sebode, Marcial; Vesterhus, Mette.

In: J HEPATOL, Vol. 74, No. 3, 03.2021, p. 755-756.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalOther (editorial matter etc.)Research

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c16b33c0733f4514857c6a0fce763b50,
title = "Reply to: {"}Both tacrolimus and mycophenylate mophetil should be considered second-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis{"}",
author = "Lohse, {Ansgar W} and Marcial Sebode and Mette Vesterhus",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.031",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "755--756",
journal = "J HEPATOL",
issn = "0168-8278",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to: "Both tacrolimus and mycophenylate mophetil should be considered second-line therapy for autoimmune hepatitis"

AU - Lohse, Ansgar W

AU - Sebode, Marcial

AU - Vesterhus, Mette

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.031

M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)

C2 - 33309116

VL - 74

SP - 755

EP - 756

JO - J HEPATOL

JF - J HEPATOL

SN - 0168-8278

IS - 3

ER -