Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging

Standard

Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging. / Sripanich, Yantarat; Weinberg, Maxwell W; Krähenbühl, Nicola; Rungprai, Chamnanni; Saltzman, Charles L; Barg, Alexej.

In: ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, Vol. 141, No. 5, 05.2021, p. 775-781.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sripanich, Y, Weinberg, MW, Krähenbühl, N, Rungprai, C, Saltzman, CL & Barg, A 2021, 'Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging', ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5

APA

Sripanich, Y., Weinberg, M. W., Krähenbühl, N., Rungprai, C., Saltzman, C. L., & Barg, A. (2021). Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging. ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, 141(5), 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{62588ae3f0f149228cbbaa666b105ded,
title = "Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging.METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement.RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation.CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.",
author = "Yantarat Sripanich and Weinberg, {Maxwell W} and Nicola Kr{\"a}henb{\"u}hl and Chamnanni Rungprai and Saltzman, {Charles L} and Alexej Barg",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "775--781",
journal = "ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU",
issn = "0936-8051",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging

AU - Sripanich, Yantarat

AU - Weinberg, Maxwell W

AU - Krähenbühl, Nicola

AU - Rungprai, Chamnanni

AU - Saltzman, Charles L

AU - Barg, Alexej

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging.METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement.RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation.CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Subtle Lisfranc joint injuries remain challenging to diagnose in clinical practice. Although of questionable accuracy, bilateral weightbearing radiographs are considered the current gold standard to assess these injuries. However, weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT), which provides clearer visualization of bony landmarks, can also be used for evaluation. This study aims to design a protocol that reliably measures the distance between the medial cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsal (M2) to assess the Lisfranc joint using WBCT imaging.METHODS: Two unique methods of measuring the C1-M2 distance were designed that localize the center of the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (ILL, reference point). This reference point was located by (I) measuring a specific distance at the M2 base, or (II) approximating from nearby bony landmarks, on both axial (Ax) and coronal (Cor) WBCT images. Four parameters (I-Ax, I-Cor, II-Ax, and II-Cor) were evaluated for each of 96 specimens. Measurements were recorded by three independent observers and repeated for inter- and intra-observer agreement.RESULTS: In total, 96 patient image series were included and assessed in our study with an average age of 46 (19-66, SD 16.1) and average BMI of 25.8 (17.8-30.5, SD 4.3). I-Ax showed excellent agreement for intra-observer evaluation (R = 0.802) and good agreement for inter-observer evaluation (R = 0.727). I-Cor demonstrated excellent inter- (R = 0.814) and intra-observer (R = 0.840) agreement. Good agreement was found for both II-Ax and II-Cor for both intra- (R = 0.730, R = 0.708) and inter-observer (R = 0.705, R = 0.645) evaluation.CONCLUSION: Measuring the C1-M2 joint space with coronal WBCT imaging through a protocol that localizes the ILL is reproducible, simple, and can potentially be utilized clinically to evaluate the Lisfranc joint.

U2 - 10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5

DO - 10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32415387

VL - 141

SP - 775

EP - 781

JO - ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU

JF - ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU

SN - 0936-8051

IS - 5

ER -