Research ExplorerPublicationsRelationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment p...

Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring

Standard

Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring. / Butter, Christian; Klein, Gunnar; Grönefeld, Gerian; Böcker, Dirk; Suling, Anna; Buchholz, Anika; Felk, Angelika; Hauser, Tino; Wegscheider, Karl; Bänsch, Dietmar.

In: TECHNOL HEALTH CARE, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2024, p. 1583-1593.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Butter, C, Klein, G, Grönefeld, G, Böcker, D, Suling, A, Buchholz, A, Felk, A, Hauser, T, Wegscheider, K & Bänsch, D 2024, 'Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring', TECHNOL HEALTH CARE, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1583-1593. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230641

APA

Butter, C., Klein, G., Grönefeld, G., Böcker, D., Suling, A., Buchholz, A., Felk, A., Hauser, T., Wegscheider, K., & Bänsch, D. (2024). Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring. TECHNOL HEALTH CARE, 32(3), 1583-1593. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230641

Vancouver

Butter C, Klein G, Grönefeld G, Böcker D, Suling A, Buchholz A et al. Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring. TECHNOL HEALTH CARE. 2024;32(3):1583-1593. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230641

Bibtex

@article{b3f759dddfa34f03b7aa744f525bd804,
title = "Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Both highly specialized heart centres and less specialized hospitals care for patients with implantable ICDs/CRT-Ds with remote monitoring.OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in patient treatment according to centre's ICD implantation volume.METHODS: Based on their 2012 ICD/CRT-D implantation volume, centres enrolled in the NORDIC ICD trial in Germany were assigned to one of three groups: high- (HV, n= 345), medium- (MV, n= 340) or low-volume (LV, n= 189).RESULTS: The HV-centres had a significant higher CRT-D proportion (41.7%; LV: 36.5%; MV: 23.2%; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001), significant shorter median procedure duration (49 min; MV: 58 min; LV: 60 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) but significant longer median hospital stay (4 days; MV and LV: 3 days; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) compared to MV- and LV-centres. The X-ray exposure was shorter in MV/HV-centres (MV: 3.4 min; HV: 3.6 min; LV: 5.5 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001). Only 3.5% (LV: 2.6%; HV: 3.5%; MV: 4.1%) patients received at least one delivered inappropriate shock and 2.5% (HV: 2.0%; LV: 2.6%; MV: 2.9%) patients had withheld inappropriate ICD shocks without subsequent inappropriate shock delivery within 24.5 months of median follow-up.CONCLUSION: Implantation volume-dependent differences were observed in the device selection, procedure duration and x-ray exposure duration. Remote monitoring in combination with adequate response pattern prevented imminent inappropriate shocks in all three groups.",
author = "Christian Butter and Gunnar Klein and Gerian Gr{\"o}nefeld and Dirk B{\"o}cker and Anna Suling and Anika Buchholz and Angelika Felk and Tino Hauser and Karl Wegscheider and Dietmar B{\"a}nsch",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.3233/THC-230641",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1583--1593",
journal = "TECHNOL HEALTH CARE",
issn = "0928-7329",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between ICD implantation volume and treatment parameters of patients receiving an ICD with remote monitoring

AU - Butter, Christian

AU - Klein, Gunnar

AU - Grönefeld, Gerian

AU - Böcker, Dirk

AU - Suling, Anna

AU - Buchholz, Anika

AU - Felk, Angelika

AU - Hauser, Tino

AU - Wegscheider, Karl

AU - Bänsch, Dietmar

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - BACKGROUND: Both highly specialized heart centres and less specialized hospitals care for patients with implantable ICDs/CRT-Ds with remote monitoring.OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in patient treatment according to centre's ICD implantation volume.METHODS: Based on their 2012 ICD/CRT-D implantation volume, centres enrolled in the NORDIC ICD trial in Germany were assigned to one of three groups: high- (HV, n= 345), medium- (MV, n= 340) or low-volume (LV, n= 189).RESULTS: The HV-centres had a significant higher CRT-D proportion (41.7%; LV: 36.5%; MV: 23.2%; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001), significant shorter median procedure duration (49 min; MV: 58 min; LV: 60 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) but significant longer median hospital stay (4 days; MV and LV: 3 days; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) compared to MV- and LV-centres. The X-ray exposure was shorter in MV/HV-centres (MV: 3.4 min; HV: 3.6 min; LV: 5.5 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001). Only 3.5% (LV: 2.6%; HV: 3.5%; MV: 4.1%) patients received at least one delivered inappropriate shock and 2.5% (HV: 2.0%; LV: 2.6%; MV: 2.9%) patients had withheld inappropriate ICD shocks without subsequent inappropriate shock delivery within 24.5 months of median follow-up.CONCLUSION: Implantation volume-dependent differences were observed in the device selection, procedure duration and x-ray exposure duration. Remote monitoring in combination with adequate response pattern prevented imminent inappropriate shocks in all three groups.

AB - BACKGROUND: Both highly specialized heart centres and less specialized hospitals care for patients with implantable ICDs/CRT-Ds with remote monitoring.OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in patient treatment according to centre's ICD implantation volume.METHODS: Based on their 2012 ICD/CRT-D implantation volume, centres enrolled in the NORDIC ICD trial in Germany were assigned to one of three groups: high- (HV, n= 345), medium- (MV, n= 340) or low-volume (LV, n= 189).RESULTS: The HV-centres had a significant higher CRT-D proportion (41.7%; LV: 36.5%; MV: 23.2%; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001), significant shorter median procedure duration (49 min; MV: 58 min; LV: 60 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) but significant longer median hospital stay (4 days; MV and LV: 3 days; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001) compared to MV- and LV-centres. The X-ray exposure was shorter in MV/HV-centres (MV: 3.4 min; HV: 3.6 min; LV: 5.5 min; Pd454;d459;d45c;d44f;d44e;d459;< 0.001). Only 3.5% (LV: 2.6%; HV: 3.5%; MV: 4.1%) patients received at least one delivered inappropriate shock and 2.5% (HV: 2.0%; LV: 2.6%; MV: 2.9%) patients had withheld inappropriate ICD shocks without subsequent inappropriate shock delivery within 24.5 months of median follow-up.CONCLUSION: Implantation volume-dependent differences were observed in the device selection, procedure duration and x-ray exposure duration. Remote monitoring in combination with adequate response pattern prevented imminent inappropriate shocks in all three groups.

U2 - 10.3233/THC-230641

DO - 10.3233/THC-230641

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37955096

VL - 32

SP - 1583

EP - 1593

JO - TECHNOL HEALTH CARE

JF - TECHNOL HEALTH CARE

SN - 0928-7329

IS - 3

ER -