Relations of Sex to Diagnosis and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Standard

Relations of Sex to Diagnosis and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome. / Sörensen, Nils Arne; Neumann, Johannes Tobias; Ojeda, Francisco; Schäfer, Sarina; Magnussen, Christina; Keller, Till; Lackner, Karl J; Zeller, Tanja; Karakas, Mahir; Münzel, Thomas; Blankenberg, Stefan; Westermann, Dirk; Schnabel, Renate B.

In: J AM HEART ASSOC, Vol. 7, No. 6, 10.03.2018.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7badb4c514384eafa296e8a76b34ba00,
title = "Relations of Sex to Diagnosis and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The atypical presentation of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been related to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which may explain worse outcome compared with men.METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed pooled data of 2520 patients of 2 prospective cohorts in terms of differences in presentation and management of women and men suggestive of ACS. Using logistic regression, we established 2 diagnostic models and tested their diagnostic performance in both sexes separately. Sex-specific differences in management of patients with ACS were ascertained and a 2-year follow-up was performed. Women were older than men (median 67 versus 61 years, P=0.001), had more often dyspnea (22% versus 18%, P=0.024), nausea or vomiting (26% versus 16%, P=0.001) and radiating chest pain (47% versus 40%, P=0.001). Classical risk factors (smoking, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia or known coronary artery disease) were less frequent in women. Diagnostic models showed no significant sex-related differences in diagnostic performance in a {"}first contact{"} setting (medical history and symptoms) or after {"}complete triage{"} (including ECG and biomarkers). Women with ACS underwent coronary angiography (73.8% versus 84.3%, P<0.001) and revascularization (53.8% versus 70.1%, P<0.001) less frequently. Two-year incidence of myocardial infarction and death was similar in both sexes, but revascularization and cardiac rehospitalization were more frequent in men.CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with suspected ACS, sex differences in clinical presentation did not impair diagnostic accuracy. Two-year outcomes were comparable. Our findings suggest a benefit of chest pain units to minimize sex differences in ACS management and prognosis.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02355457 (BACC), NCT03227159 (stenoCardia).",
keywords = "Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis, Aged, Female, Germany/epidemiology, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome",
author = "S{\"o}rensen, {Nils Arne} and Neumann, {Johannes Tobias} and Francisco Ojeda and Sarina Sch{\"a}fer and Christina Magnussen and Till Keller and Lackner, {Karl J} and Tanja Zeller and Mahir Karakas and Thomas M{\"u}nzel and Stefan Blankenberg and Dirk Westermann and Schnabel, {Renate B}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.117.007297",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "J AM HEART ASSOC",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relations of Sex to Diagnosis and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome

AU - Sörensen, Nils Arne

AU - Neumann, Johannes Tobias

AU - Ojeda, Francisco

AU - Schäfer, Sarina

AU - Magnussen, Christina

AU - Keller, Till

AU - Lackner, Karl J

AU - Zeller, Tanja

AU - Karakas, Mahir

AU - Münzel, Thomas

AU - Blankenberg, Stefan

AU - Westermann, Dirk

AU - Schnabel, Renate B

N1 - © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

PY - 2018/3/10

Y1 - 2018/3/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: The atypical presentation of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been related to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which may explain worse outcome compared with men.METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed pooled data of 2520 patients of 2 prospective cohorts in terms of differences in presentation and management of women and men suggestive of ACS. Using logistic regression, we established 2 diagnostic models and tested their diagnostic performance in both sexes separately. Sex-specific differences in management of patients with ACS were ascertained and a 2-year follow-up was performed. Women were older than men (median 67 versus 61 years, P=0.001), had more often dyspnea (22% versus 18%, P=0.024), nausea or vomiting (26% versus 16%, P=0.001) and radiating chest pain (47% versus 40%, P=0.001). Classical risk factors (smoking, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia or known coronary artery disease) were less frequent in women. Diagnostic models showed no significant sex-related differences in diagnostic performance in a "first contact" setting (medical history and symptoms) or after "complete triage" (including ECG and biomarkers). Women with ACS underwent coronary angiography (73.8% versus 84.3%, P<0.001) and revascularization (53.8% versus 70.1%, P<0.001) less frequently. Two-year incidence of myocardial infarction and death was similar in both sexes, but revascularization and cardiac rehospitalization were more frequent in men.CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with suspected ACS, sex differences in clinical presentation did not impair diagnostic accuracy. Two-year outcomes were comparable. Our findings suggest a benefit of chest pain units to minimize sex differences in ACS management and prognosis.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02355457 (BACC), NCT03227159 (stenoCardia).

AB - BACKGROUND: The atypical presentation of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been related to delayed diagnosis and treatment, which may explain worse outcome compared with men.METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed pooled data of 2520 patients of 2 prospective cohorts in terms of differences in presentation and management of women and men suggestive of ACS. Using logistic regression, we established 2 diagnostic models and tested their diagnostic performance in both sexes separately. Sex-specific differences in management of patients with ACS were ascertained and a 2-year follow-up was performed. Women were older than men (median 67 versus 61 years, P=0.001), had more often dyspnea (22% versus 18%, P=0.024), nausea or vomiting (26% versus 16%, P=0.001) and radiating chest pain (47% versus 40%, P=0.001). Classical risk factors (smoking, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia or known coronary artery disease) were less frequent in women. Diagnostic models showed no significant sex-related differences in diagnostic performance in a "first contact" setting (medical history and symptoms) or after "complete triage" (including ECG and biomarkers). Women with ACS underwent coronary angiography (73.8% versus 84.3%, P<0.001) and revascularization (53.8% versus 70.1%, P<0.001) less frequently. Two-year incidence of myocardial infarction and death was similar in both sexes, but revascularization and cardiac rehospitalization were more frequent in men.CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with suspected ACS, sex differences in clinical presentation did not impair diagnostic accuracy. Two-year outcomes were comparable. Our findings suggest a benefit of chest pain units to minimize sex differences in ACS management and prognosis.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02355457 (BACC), NCT03227159 (stenoCardia).

KW - Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Germany/epidemiology

KW - Health Status Disparities

KW - Healthcare Disparities

KW - Humans

KW - Incidence

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Time Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.117.007297

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.117.007297

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29525782

VL - 7

JO - J AM HEART ASSOC

JF - J AM HEART ASSOC

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 6

ER -