Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without lonafarnib in first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer stage IIB-IV

  • Werner Meier
  • Andreas du Bois
  • Jörn Rau
  • Martina Gropp-Meier
  • Klaus Baumann
  • Jens Huober
  • Kerstin Wollschlaeger
  • Rolf Kreienberg
  • Ulrich Canzler
  • Barbara Schmalfeldt
  • Pauline Wimberger
  • Barbara Richter
  • Willibald Schröder
  • Antje Belau
  • Anne Stähle
  • Alexander Burges
  • Jalid Sehouli

Related Research units

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates whether a molecular targeted therapy with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib added to standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) could improve progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized phase II study to compare standard therapy carboplatin (C; AUC 5) and paclitaxel (T; 175 mg/m(2)) in primary advanced OC with or without lonafarnib (L). Lonafarnib was given in a dose of 100mg orally twice a day during chemotherapy and was increased afterwards to 200mg up to six months as a maintenance therapy.

RESULTS: 105 patients were recruited (53 patients were randomized to receive LTC, 52 to TC). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicity, occurred significantly more often with LTC (23% versus 4%, p=0.005) and was associated with a higher dropout rate. PFS and OS were not significantly different among both arms. The LTC arm showed inferiority in the stratum with residual tumor of more than 1cm: median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.2) compared with 16.4 (95% CI: 10.3-40.4) for TC (p=0.0141; HR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.15-0.84)) with median OS 20.6 months (95% CI: 13.1-31.0) and 43.4 months (95% CI: 15.7-) for the TC arm (p=0.012; HR=0.32 (95% CI: 0.13-0.8)).

CONCLUSION: The addition of lonafarnib did not improve PFS or OS. Patients with a residual tumor of more than 1cm had significantly shorter PFS and OS. Incorporation of lonafarnib into future studies for primary therapy of OC is not recommended.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0090-8258
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 08.2012
PubMed 22564713