Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm für abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll!

Standard

Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm für abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll! / Böckler, D.; Lang, W.; Debus, E. S.; Flessenkämper, I.; Florek, H. J.; Noppeney, T.; Schmitz-Rixen, T.; Nöldecke, S.; Hupp, T.; Eckstein, H. H.

In: GEFASSCHIRURGIE, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.2009, p. 350-361.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Böckler, D, Lang, W, Debus, ES, Flessenkämper, I, Florek, HJ, Noppeney, T, Schmitz-Rixen, T, Nöldecke, S, Hupp, T & Eckstein, HH 2009, 'Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm für abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll!', GEFASSCHIRURGIE, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-009-0696-y

APA

Böckler, D., Lang, W., Debus, E. S., Flessenkämper, I., Florek, H. J., Noppeney, T., Schmitz-Rixen, T., Nöldecke, S., Hupp, T., & Eckstein, H. H. (2009). Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm für abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll! GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 14(5), 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-009-0696-y

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{15a5b161234c4d48b3b7edc2c64abb2c,
title = "Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm f{\"u}r abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll!",
abstract = "Results have been published of randomised controlled studies on the screening of elderly men for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore carried out in order to be able to assess the pooled effects. A Medline search (PubMed) for randomised controlled studies was carried out using the key words {"}screening{"} and {"}aortic aneurysms{"} in English. The medium-term (3.5-5 years) and long-term (7-15 years) effects were calculated as the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Four studies were identified, the {"}Chichester Study{"} (UK/England), the {"}Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study{"} (MASS) (UK/England), the {"}Western Australian Aneurysm Screening Study{"} (AUS) and the {"}Viborg Study{"} (Denmark). The analysis showed that the probability of an AAA rupture fell significantly by 47% as a result of screening, AAA-related mortality (after men over the age of 80 years were excluded) decreased by 49% and overall mortality was also reduced (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96). The number of planned operations increased 3-fold (p<0.05) and the probability of emergency operations decreased by 45% (p<0.05). The long-term pooled results showed a significant reduction of 47% in the probability of both AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality and a significant decrease in overall mortality (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97). Overall, 1.7 times more operations were carried out on the men invited for screening than on the controls (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.57; 1.99). AAA screening reduces the probability of rupture and AAA-related mortality by about 50% each and overall mortality by about 6-7%, although there are differences which might have an impact on local cost-benefit ratio of the screening.",
keywords = "Abdominal aorta, Aneurysm, Screening, Study, Ultrasound",
author = "D. B{\"o}ckler and W. Lang and Debus, {E. S.} and I. Flessenk{\"a}mper and Florek, {H. J.} and T. Noppeney and T. Schmitz-Rixen and S. N{\"o}ldecke and T. Hupp and Eckstein, {H. H.}",
year = "2009",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s00772-009-0696-y",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "14",
pages = "350--361",
journal = "GEFASSCHIRURGIE",
issn = "0948-7034",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomisierte Studien mit EBM-Level 1 beweisen es: Ein Screeningprogramm für abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen ist sinnvoll!

AU - Böckler, D.

AU - Lang, W.

AU - Debus, E. S.

AU - Flessenkämper, I.

AU - Florek, H. J.

AU - Noppeney, T.

AU - Schmitz-Rixen, T.

AU - Nöldecke, S.

AU - Hupp, T.

AU - Eckstein, H. H.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Results have been published of randomised controlled studies on the screening of elderly men for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore carried out in order to be able to assess the pooled effects. A Medline search (PubMed) for randomised controlled studies was carried out using the key words "screening" and "aortic aneurysms" in English. The medium-term (3.5-5 years) and long-term (7-15 years) effects were calculated as the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Four studies were identified, the "Chichester Study" (UK/England), the "Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study" (MASS) (UK/England), the "Western Australian Aneurysm Screening Study" (AUS) and the "Viborg Study" (Denmark). The analysis showed that the probability of an AAA rupture fell significantly by 47% as a result of screening, AAA-related mortality (after men over the age of 80 years were excluded) decreased by 49% and overall mortality was also reduced (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96). The number of planned operations increased 3-fold (p<0.05) and the probability of emergency operations decreased by 45% (p<0.05). The long-term pooled results showed a significant reduction of 47% in the probability of both AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality and a significant decrease in overall mortality (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97). Overall, 1.7 times more operations were carried out on the men invited for screening than on the controls (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.57; 1.99). AAA screening reduces the probability of rupture and AAA-related mortality by about 50% each and overall mortality by about 6-7%, although there are differences which might have an impact on local cost-benefit ratio of the screening.

AB - Results have been published of randomised controlled studies on the screening of elderly men for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore carried out in order to be able to assess the pooled effects. A Medline search (PubMed) for randomised controlled studies was carried out using the key words "screening" and "aortic aneurysms" in English. The medium-term (3.5-5 years) and long-term (7-15 years) effects were calculated as the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Four studies were identified, the "Chichester Study" (UK/England), the "Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study" (MASS) (UK/England), the "Western Australian Aneurysm Screening Study" (AUS) and the "Viborg Study" (Denmark). The analysis showed that the probability of an AAA rupture fell significantly by 47% as a result of screening, AAA-related mortality (after men over the age of 80 years were excluded) decreased by 49% and overall mortality was also reduced (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96). The number of planned operations increased 3-fold (p<0.05) and the probability of emergency operations decreased by 45% (p<0.05). The long-term pooled results showed a significant reduction of 47% in the probability of both AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality and a significant decrease in overall mortality (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97). Overall, 1.7 times more operations were carried out on the men invited for screening than on the controls (OR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.57; 1.99). AAA screening reduces the probability of rupture and AAA-related mortality by about 50% each and overall mortality by about 6-7%, although there are differences which might have an impact on local cost-benefit ratio of the screening.

KW - Abdominal aorta

KW - Aneurysm

KW - Screening

KW - Study

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350139373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00772-009-0696-y

DO - 10.1007/s00772-009-0696-y

M3 - SCORING: Review

AN - SCOPUS:70350139373

VL - 14

SP - 350

EP - 361

JO - GEFASSCHIRURGIE

JF - GEFASSCHIRURGIE

SN - 0948-7034

IS - 5

ER -