Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Standard

Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer : Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions. / Okamoto, Shozo; Thieme, Anne; Allmann, Jakob; D'Alessandria, Calogero; Maurer, Tobias; Retz, Margitta; Tauber, Robert; Heck, Matthias M; Wester, Hans-Juergen; Tamaki, Nagara; Fendler, Wolfgang P; Herrmann, Ken; Pfob, Christian H; Scheidhauer, Klemens; Schwaiger, Markus; Ziegler, Sibylle; Eiber, Matthias.

In: J NUCL MED, Vol. 58, No. 3, 03.2017, p. 445-450.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearch

Harvard

Okamoto, S, Thieme, A, Allmann, J, D'Alessandria, C, Maurer, T, Retz, M, Tauber, R, Heck, MM, Wester, H-J, Tamaki, N, Fendler, WP, Herrmann, K, Pfob, CH, Scheidhauer, K, Schwaiger, M, Ziegler, S & Eiber, M 2017, 'Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions', J NUCL MED, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 445-450. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.178483

APA

Okamoto, S., Thieme, A., Allmann, J., D'Alessandria, C., Maurer, T., Retz, M., Tauber, R., Heck, M. M., Wester, H-J., Tamaki, N., Fendler, W. P., Herrmann, K., Pfob, C. H., Scheidhauer, K., Schwaiger, M., Ziegler, S., & Eiber, M. (2017). Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions. J NUCL MED, 58(3), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.178483

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7c5c9012d9b049ccbf89978df7991999,
title = "Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions",
abstract = "Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy is increasingly used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to estimate the absorbed doses for normal organs and tumor lesions using 177Lu-PSMA I&T (I&T is imaging and therapy) in patients undergoing up to 4 cycles of radioligand therapy. Results were compared with pretherapeutic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBEDCC)] (68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC) PET. Methods: A total of 34 cycles in 18 patients were analyzed retrospectively. In 15 patients the first, in 9 the second, in 5 the third, and in 5 the fourth cycle was analyzed, respectively. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed at least between 30-120 min, 24 h, and 6-8 d after administration. Regions of interest covering the whole body, organs, and up to 4 tumor lesions were drawn. Organ and tumor masses were derived from pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Absorbed doses for individual cycles were calculated using OLINDA/EXM. SUVs from pretherapeutic PET were compared with absorbed doses and with change of SUV. Results: The mean whole-body effective dose for all cycles was 0.06 ± 0.03 Sv/GBq. The mean absorbed organ doses were 0.72 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq for the kidneys; 0.12 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq for the liver; and 0.55 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq for the parotid, 0.64 ± 0.40 Gy/GBq for the submandibular, and 3.8 ± 1.4 Gy/GBq for the lacrimal glands. Absorbed organ doses were relatively constant among the 4 different cycles. Tumor lesions received a mean absorbed dose per cycle of 3.2 ± 2.6 Gy/GBq (range, 0.22-12 Gy/GBq). Doses to tumor lesions gradually decreased, with 3.5 ± 2.9 Gy/GBq for the first, 3.3 ± 2.5 Gy/GBq for the second, 2.7 ± 2.3 Gy/GBq for the third, and 2.4 ± 2.2 Gy/GBq for the fourth cycle. SUVs of pretherapeutic PET moderately correlated with absorbed dose (r = 0.44, P < 0.001 for SUVmax; r = 0.43, P < 0.001 for SUVmean) and moderately correlated with the change of SUV (r = 0.478, P < 0.001 for SUVmax, and r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for SUVmean). Conclusion: Organ- and tumor-absorbed doses for 177Lu-PSMA I&T are comparable to recent reports and complement these with information on an excellent correlation between the 4 therapy cycles. With the kidneys representing the critical organ, a cumulative activity of 40 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA I&T appears to be safe and justifiable. The correlation between pretherapeutic SUV and absorbed tumor dose emphasizes the need for PSMA-ligand PET imaging for patient selection.",
keywords = "Absorption, Radiation, Aged, Dipeptides, Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring, Humans, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organ Sparing Treatments, Organ Specificity, Positron-Emission Tomography, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, Radiopharmaceuticals, Radiotherapy Dosage, Retrospective Studies, Tissue Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Whole-Body Counting, Journal Article",
author = "Shozo Okamoto and Anne Thieme and Jakob Allmann and Calogero D'Alessandria and Tobias Maurer and Margitta Retz and Robert Tauber and Heck, {Matthias M} and Hans-Juergen Wester and Nagara Tamaki and Fendler, {Wolfgang P} and Ken Herrmann and Pfob, {Christian H} and Klemens Scheidhauer and Markus Schwaiger and Sibylle Ziegler and Matthias Eiber",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
doi = "10.2967/jnumed.116.178483",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "445--450",
journal = "J NUCL MED",
issn = "0161-5505",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiation Dosimetry for Lu-PSMA I&T in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

T2 - Absorbed Dose in Normal Organs and Tumor Lesions

AU - Okamoto, Shozo

AU - Thieme, Anne

AU - Allmann, Jakob

AU - D'Alessandria, Calogero

AU - Maurer, Tobias

AU - Retz, Margitta

AU - Tauber, Robert

AU - Heck, Matthias M

AU - Wester, Hans-Juergen

AU - Tamaki, Nagara

AU - Fendler, Wolfgang P

AU - Herrmann, Ken

AU - Pfob, Christian H

AU - Scheidhauer, Klemens

AU - Schwaiger, Markus

AU - Ziegler, Sibylle

AU - Eiber, Matthias

N1 - © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy is increasingly used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to estimate the absorbed doses for normal organs and tumor lesions using 177Lu-PSMA I&T (I&T is imaging and therapy) in patients undergoing up to 4 cycles of radioligand therapy. Results were compared with pretherapeutic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBEDCC)] (68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC) PET. Methods: A total of 34 cycles in 18 patients were analyzed retrospectively. In 15 patients the first, in 9 the second, in 5 the third, and in 5 the fourth cycle was analyzed, respectively. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed at least between 30-120 min, 24 h, and 6-8 d after administration. Regions of interest covering the whole body, organs, and up to 4 tumor lesions were drawn. Organ and tumor masses were derived from pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Absorbed doses for individual cycles were calculated using OLINDA/EXM. SUVs from pretherapeutic PET were compared with absorbed doses and with change of SUV. Results: The mean whole-body effective dose for all cycles was 0.06 ± 0.03 Sv/GBq. The mean absorbed organ doses were 0.72 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq for the kidneys; 0.12 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq for the liver; and 0.55 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq for the parotid, 0.64 ± 0.40 Gy/GBq for the submandibular, and 3.8 ± 1.4 Gy/GBq for the lacrimal glands. Absorbed organ doses were relatively constant among the 4 different cycles. Tumor lesions received a mean absorbed dose per cycle of 3.2 ± 2.6 Gy/GBq (range, 0.22-12 Gy/GBq). Doses to tumor lesions gradually decreased, with 3.5 ± 2.9 Gy/GBq for the first, 3.3 ± 2.5 Gy/GBq for the second, 2.7 ± 2.3 Gy/GBq for the third, and 2.4 ± 2.2 Gy/GBq for the fourth cycle. SUVs of pretherapeutic PET moderately correlated with absorbed dose (r = 0.44, P < 0.001 for SUVmax; r = 0.43, P < 0.001 for SUVmean) and moderately correlated with the change of SUV (r = 0.478, P < 0.001 for SUVmax, and r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for SUVmean). Conclusion: Organ- and tumor-absorbed doses for 177Lu-PSMA I&T are comparable to recent reports and complement these with information on an excellent correlation between the 4 therapy cycles. With the kidneys representing the critical organ, a cumulative activity of 40 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA I&T appears to be safe and justifiable. The correlation between pretherapeutic SUV and absorbed tumor dose emphasizes the need for PSMA-ligand PET imaging for patient selection.

AB - Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy is increasingly used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to estimate the absorbed doses for normal organs and tumor lesions using 177Lu-PSMA I&T (I&T is imaging and therapy) in patients undergoing up to 4 cycles of radioligand therapy. Results were compared with pretherapeutic Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[68Ga(HBEDCC)] (68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC) PET. Methods: A total of 34 cycles in 18 patients were analyzed retrospectively. In 15 patients the first, in 9 the second, in 5 the third, and in 5 the fourth cycle was analyzed, respectively. Whole-body scintigraphy was performed at least between 30-120 min, 24 h, and 6-8 d after administration. Regions of interest covering the whole body, organs, and up to 4 tumor lesions were drawn. Organ and tumor masses were derived from pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Absorbed doses for individual cycles were calculated using OLINDA/EXM. SUVs from pretherapeutic PET were compared with absorbed doses and with change of SUV. Results: The mean whole-body effective dose for all cycles was 0.06 ± 0.03 Sv/GBq. The mean absorbed organ doses were 0.72 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq for the kidneys; 0.12 ± 0.06 Gy/GBq for the liver; and 0.55 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq for the parotid, 0.64 ± 0.40 Gy/GBq for the submandibular, and 3.8 ± 1.4 Gy/GBq for the lacrimal glands. Absorbed organ doses were relatively constant among the 4 different cycles. Tumor lesions received a mean absorbed dose per cycle of 3.2 ± 2.6 Gy/GBq (range, 0.22-12 Gy/GBq). Doses to tumor lesions gradually decreased, with 3.5 ± 2.9 Gy/GBq for the first, 3.3 ± 2.5 Gy/GBq for the second, 2.7 ± 2.3 Gy/GBq for the third, and 2.4 ± 2.2 Gy/GBq for the fourth cycle. SUVs of pretherapeutic PET moderately correlated with absorbed dose (r = 0.44, P < 0.001 for SUVmax; r = 0.43, P < 0.001 for SUVmean) and moderately correlated with the change of SUV (r = 0.478, P < 0.001 for SUVmax, and r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for SUVmean). Conclusion: Organ- and tumor-absorbed doses for 177Lu-PSMA I&T are comparable to recent reports and complement these with information on an excellent correlation between the 4 therapy cycles. With the kidneys representing the critical organ, a cumulative activity of 40 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA I&T appears to be safe and justifiable. The correlation between pretherapeutic SUV and absorbed tumor dose emphasizes the need for PSMA-ligand PET imaging for patient selection.

KW - Absorption, Radiation

KW - Aged

KW - Dipeptides

KW - Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Metabolic Clearance Rate

KW - Neoplasm Metastasis

KW - Organ Sparing Treatments

KW - Organ Specificity

KW - Positron-Emission Tomography

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

KW - Radiopharmaceuticals

KW - Radiotherapy Dosage

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Tissue Distribution

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Whole-Body Counting

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.116.178483

DO - 10.2967/jnumed.116.178483

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27660138

VL - 58

SP - 445

EP - 450

JO - J NUCL MED

JF - J NUCL MED

SN - 0161-5505

IS - 3

ER -