Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure
Standard
Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure. / Meidert, A S; Huber, W; Müller, J N; Schöfthaler, M; Hapfelmeier, A; Langwieser, N; Wagner, J Y; Eyer, F; Schmid, R M; Saugel, B.
In: BRIT J ANAESTH, Vol. 112, No. 3, 2014, p. 521-8.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure
AU - Meidert, A S
AU - Huber, W
AU - Müller, J N
AU - Schöfthaler, M
AU - Hapfelmeier, A
AU - Langwieser, N
AU - Wagner, J Y
AU - Eyer, F
AU - Schmid, R M
AU - Saugel, B
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - BACKGROUND: Radial artery applanation tonometry technology can be used for continuous non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure (AP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate this AP monitoring technology in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in comparison with invasive AP monitoring using a radial arterial catheter.METHODS: In 24 ICU patients (German university hospital), AP values were simultaneously recorded on a beat-to-beat basis using radial artery applanation tonometry (T-Line system; Tensys Medical, San Diego, CA, USA) and a radial arterial catheter (contralateral arm). The primary endpoint of the study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of the non-invasively assessed AP measurements with the Bland-Altman method based on averaged 10 beat AP epochs (n=2993 10 beat epochs).RESULTS: For mean AP (MAP), systolic AP (SAP), and diastolic AP (DAP), we observed a bias (±standard deviation of the bias; 95% limits of agreement; percentage error) of +2 mm Hg (±6; -11 to +15 mm Hg; 15%), -3 mm Hg (±15; -33 to +27 mm Hg; 23%), and +5 mm Hg (±7; -9 to +19 mm Hg; 22%), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: In ICU patients, MAP and DAP measurements obtained using radial artery applanation tonometry show clinically acceptable agreement with invasive AP determination with a radial arterial catheter. While the radial artery applanation tonometry technology also allows SAP measurements with high accuracy, its precision for SAP measurements needs to be further improved.
AB - BACKGROUND: Radial artery applanation tonometry technology can be used for continuous non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure (AP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate this AP monitoring technology in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in comparison with invasive AP monitoring using a radial arterial catheter.METHODS: In 24 ICU patients (German university hospital), AP values were simultaneously recorded on a beat-to-beat basis using radial artery applanation tonometry (T-Line system; Tensys Medical, San Diego, CA, USA) and a radial arterial catheter (contralateral arm). The primary endpoint of the study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of the non-invasively assessed AP measurements with the Bland-Altman method based on averaged 10 beat AP epochs (n=2993 10 beat epochs).RESULTS: For mean AP (MAP), systolic AP (SAP), and diastolic AP (DAP), we observed a bias (±standard deviation of the bias; 95% limits of agreement; percentage error) of +2 mm Hg (±6; -11 to +15 mm Hg; 15%), -3 mm Hg (±15; -33 to +27 mm Hg; 23%), and +5 mm Hg (±7; -9 to +19 mm Hg; 22%), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: In ICU patients, MAP and DAP measurements obtained using radial artery applanation tonometry show clinically acceptable agreement with invasive AP determination with a radial arterial catheter. While the radial artery applanation tonometry technology also allows SAP measurements with high accuracy, its precision for SAP measurements needs to be further improved.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Arterial Pressure
KW - Endpoint Determination
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Intensive Care
KW - Male
KW - Manometry
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Monitoring, Physiologic
KW - Radial Artery
KW - Reproducibility of Results
U2 - 10.1093/bja/aet400
DO - 10.1093/bja/aet400
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 24355832
VL - 112
SP - 521
EP - 528
JO - BRIT J ANAESTH
JF - BRIT J ANAESTH
SN - 0007-0912
IS - 3
ER -