Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Standard

Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. / Leichsenring, Falk; Salzer, Simone; Beutel, Manfred E; Herpertz, Stephan; Hiller, Wolfgang; Hoyer, Juergen; Huesing, Johannes; Joraschky, Peter; Nolting, Bjoern; Poehlmann, Karin; Ritter, Viktoria; Stangier, Ulrich; Strauss, Bernhard; Stuhldreher, Nina; Tefikow, Susan; Teismann, Tobias; Willutzki, Ulrike; Wiltink, Joerg; Leibing, Eric.

In: AM J PSYCHIAT, Vol. 170, No. 7, 01.07.2013, p. 759-67.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Leichsenring, F, Salzer, S, Beutel, ME, Herpertz, S, Hiller, W, Hoyer, J, Huesing, J, Joraschky, P, Nolting, B, Poehlmann, K, Ritter, V, Stangier, U, Strauss, B, Stuhldreher, N, Tefikow, S, Teismann, T, Willutzki, U, Wiltink, J & Leibing, E 2013, 'Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial', AM J PSYCHIAT, vol. 170, no. 7, pp. 759-67. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125

APA

Leichsenring, F., Salzer, S., Beutel, M. E., Herpertz, S., Hiller, W., Hoyer, J., Huesing, J., Joraschky, P., Nolting, B., Poehlmann, K., Ritter, V., Stangier, U., Strauss, B., Stuhldreher, N., Tefikow, S., Teismann, T., Willutzki, U., Wiltink, J., & Leibing, E. (2013). Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. AM J PSYCHIAT, 170(7), 759-67. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a65fe1756eb2417ca5d68b19fdc16324,
title = "Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.",
keywords = "Adult, Cognitive Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Remission Induction",
author = "Falk Leichsenring and Simone Salzer and Beutel, {Manfred E} and Stephan Herpertz and Wolfgang Hiller and Juergen Hoyer and Johannes Huesing and Peter Joraschky and Bjoern Nolting and Karin Poehlmann and Viktoria Ritter and Ulrich Stangier and Bernhard Strauss and Nina Stuhldreher and Susan Tefikow and Tobias Teismann and Ulrike Willutzki and Joerg Wiltink and Eric Leibing",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125",
language = "English",
volume = "170",
pages = "759--67",
journal = "AM J PSYCHIAT",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

AU - Leichsenring, Falk

AU - Salzer, Simone

AU - Beutel, Manfred E

AU - Herpertz, Stephan

AU - Hiller, Wolfgang

AU - Hoyer, Juergen

AU - Huesing, Johannes

AU - Joraschky, Peter

AU - Nolting, Bjoern

AU - Poehlmann, Karin

AU - Ritter, Viktoria

AU - Stangier, Ulrich

AU - Strauss, Bernhard

AU - Stuhldreher, Nina

AU - Tefikow, Susan

AU - Teismann, Tobias

AU - Willutzki, Ulrike

AU - Wiltink, Joerg

AU - Leibing, Eric

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.

AB - OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.

KW - Adult

KW - Cognitive Therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Phobic Disorders

KW - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Remission Induction

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125

DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23680854

VL - 170

SP - 759

EP - 767

JO - AM J PSYCHIAT

JF - AM J PSYCHIAT

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 7

ER -