Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield.

Standard

Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield. / Papanikolaou, Ioannis S; Adler, Andreas; Wegener, Katharina; Al-Abadi, Hussain; Dürr, Angelika; Koch, Martin; Pohl, Heiko; Abou-Rebyeh, Hassan; Veltzke-Schlieker, Wilfried; Wiedenmann, Bertram; Rösch, Thomas.

In: EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, Vol. 20, No. 4, 4, 2008, p. 342-348.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Papanikolaou, IS, Adler, A, Wegener, K, Al-Abadi, H, Dürr, A, Koch, M, Pohl, H, Abou-Rebyeh, H, Veltzke-Schlieker, W, Wiedenmann, B & Rösch, T 2008, 'Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield.', EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, vol. 20, no. 4, 4, pp. 342-348. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18334879?dopt=Citation>

APA

Papanikolaou, I. S., Adler, A., Wegener, K., Al-Abadi, H., Dürr, A., Koch, M., Pohl, H., Abou-Rebyeh, H., Veltzke-Schlieker, W., Wiedenmann, B., & Rösch, T. (2008). Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield. EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, 20(4), 342-348. [4]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18334879?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5033288f93b64caa900dc5fd513ffeae,
title = "Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with the adjunct of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration has become an important diagnostic modality in gastroenterologic oncology. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration mainly relies on cytology; data are scarce that compare cytology and histology. While testing a 22-gauge prototype needle, we prospectively compared the yield for both. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients (27 male, 15 female; mean age 59.2 years, range: 17-90 years) were included. In each patient we aimed to make two needle passes, and if the material acquired appeared insufficient macroscopically (no in-room cytopathology was available), further passes were done. The material was sent for cytological and histological assessment. RESULTS: A median number of two passes (range: 2-3) were uneventfully performed for pancreatic lesions (n=30), mediastinal and other lymph nodes/masses (n=8) and various other lesions (n=4) and yielded adequate material for cytology, histology or at least one of the two investigations in 62, 67 and 74% of patients, respectively. No false positive results were found (specificity 100%). Sensitivities were 58.6 and 65.5%, respectively, for cytology and histology alone; combined assessment increased sensitivity to 79.3%. When adjusted values were calculated, based only on those cases with adequate material, sensitivity was 89.5% for cytology and 85.7% for histology, and increased to 100% with combined assessment. CONCLUSION: The new needle achieves sensitivities similar to those previously reported with no significant differences in sensitivity between cytology and histology. More effective tissue acquisition methods must be sought to improve overall results.",
author = "Papanikolaou, {Ioannis S} and Andreas Adler and Katharina Wegener and Hussain Al-Abadi and Angelika D{\"u}rr and Martin Koch and Heiko Pohl and Hassan Abou-Rebyeh and Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker and Bertram Wiedenmann and Thomas R{\"o}sch",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "20",
pages = "342--348",
journal = "EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT",
issn = "0954-691X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield.

AU - Papanikolaou, Ioannis S

AU - Adler, Andreas

AU - Wegener, Katharina

AU - Al-Abadi, Hussain

AU - Dürr, Angelika

AU - Koch, Martin

AU - Pohl, Heiko

AU - Abou-Rebyeh, Hassan

AU - Veltzke-Schlieker, Wilfried

AU - Wiedenmann, Bertram

AU - Rösch, Thomas

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with the adjunct of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration has become an important diagnostic modality in gastroenterologic oncology. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration mainly relies on cytology; data are scarce that compare cytology and histology. While testing a 22-gauge prototype needle, we prospectively compared the yield for both. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients (27 male, 15 female; mean age 59.2 years, range: 17-90 years) were included. In each patient we aimed to make two needle passes, and if the material acquired appeared insufficient macroscopically (no in-room cytopathology was available), further passes were done. The material was sent for cytological and histological assessment. RESULTS: A median number of two passes (range: 2-3) were uneventfully performed for pancreatic lesions (n=30), mediastinal and other lymph nodes/masses (n=8) and various other lesions (n=4) and yielded adequate material for cytology, histology or at least one of the two investigations in 62, 67 and 74% of patients, respectively. No false positive results were found (specificity 100%). Sensitivities were 58.6 and 65.5%, respectively, for cytology and histology alone; combined assessment increased sensitivity to 79.3%. When adjusted values were calculated, based only on those cases with adequate material, sensitivity was 89.5% for cytology and 85.7% for histology, and increased to 100% with combined assessment. CONCLUSION: The new needle achieves sensitivities similar to those previously reported with no significant differences in sensitivity between cytology and histology. More effective tissue acquisition methods must be sought to improve overall results.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with the adjunct of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration has become an important diagnostic modality in gastroenterologic oncology. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration mainly relies on cytology; data are scarce that compare cytology and histology. While testing a 22-gauge prototype needle, we prospectively compared the yield for both. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients (27 male, 15 female; mean age 59.2 years, range: 17-90 years) were included. In each patient we aimed to make two needle passes, and if the material acquired appeared insufficient macroscopically (no in-room cytopathology was available), further passes were done. The material was sent for cytological and histological assessment. RESULTS: A median number of two passes (range: 2-3) were uneventfully performed for pancreatic lesions (n=30), mediastinal and other lymph nodes/masses (n=8) and various other lesions (n=4) and yielded adequate material for cytology, histology or at least one of the two investigations in 62, 67 and 74% of patients, respectively. No false positive results were found (specificity 100%). Sensitivities were 58.6 and 65.5%, respectively, for cytology and histology alone; combined assessment increased sensitivity to 79.3%. When adjusted values were calculated, based only on those cases with adequate material, sensitivity was 89.5% for cytology and 85.7% for histology, and increased to 100% with combined assessment. CONCLUSION: The new needle achieves sensitivities similar to those previously reported with no significant differences in sensitivity between cytology and histology. More effective tissue acquisition methods must be sought to improve overall results.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 20

SP - 342

EP - 348

JO - EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT

JF - EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT

SN - 0954-691X

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -