Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes

Standard

Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes. / Bang, Ji Young; Rösch, Thomas; Kim, Hyungjin Myra; Thakkar, Shyam; Robalino Gonzaga, Ernesto; Tharian, Benjamin; Inamdar, Sumant; Lee, Linda S; Yachimski, Patrick; Jamidar, Priya; Muniraj, Thiruvengadam; DiMaio, Christopher; Kumta, Nikhil; Sethi, Amrita; Draganov, Peter; Yang, Dennis; Seoud, Talal; Perisetti, Abhilash; Bondi, Gayatri; Kirtane, Sachin; Hawes, Robert; Wilcox, C Mel; Kozarek, Richard; Reddy, D Nageshwar; Varadarajulu, Shyam.

In: DIGEST ENDOSC, Vol. 33, No. 5, 07.2021, p. 822-828.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bang, JY, Rösch, T, Kim, HM, Thakkar, S, Robalino Gonzaga, E, Tharian, B, Inamdar, S, Lee, LS, Yachimski, P, Jamidar, P, Muniraj, T, DiMaio, C, Kumta, N, Sethi, A, Draganov, P, Yang, D, Seoud, T, Perisetti, A, Bondi, G, Kirtane, S, Hawes, R, Wilcox, CM, Kozarek, R, Reddy, DN & Varadarajulu, S 2021, 'Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes', DIGEST ENDOSC, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13856

APA

Bang, J. Y., Rösch, T., Kim, H. M., Thakkar, S., Robalino Gonzaga, E., Tharian, B., Inamdar, S., Lee, L. S., Yachimski, P., Jamidar, P., Muniraj, T., DiMaio, C., Kumta, N., Sethi, A., Draganov, P., Yang, D., Seoud, T., Perisetti, A., Bondi, G., ... Varadarajulu, S. (2021). Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes. DIGEST ENDOSC, 33(5), 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13856

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bf5fe1485fc14b3f9fde3a188c462169,
title = "Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: While single-use and detachable-tip duodenoscopes have been recently developed to overcome risks of infection transmission, there are no reliable tools to objectively assess their technical performance. We evaluated the reliability and validity of a newly developed tool to assess the technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes.METHODS: An assessment tool was developed to measure duodenoscope performance based on three distinct criteria: maneuverability, mechanical/imaging characteristics and ability to perform requisite interventions. The assessment tool was tested prospectively on duodenoscopes used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures at nine academic medical centers over a 6-month period. The main outcome was reliability of the duodenoscope assessment tool, which was estimated using Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α). The secondary outcome was validity of the assessment tool.RESULTS: The assessment tool evaluated technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes in 1080 ERCP procedures. Indications were biliary in 92.8% and pancreatic in 7.2% procedures. The overall Cronbach's coefficient α for maneuverability was 0.81, assessment of mechanical/imaging characteristics was 0.92, and ability to perform requisite interventions was 0.87. On multiple linear regression analysis, prolonged procedure duration, older patient age and pancreatic interventions were significantly positively associated with higher (worse) scores.CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed assessment tool appears reliable and valid for evaluating the technical performance of duodenoscopes. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004533.",
author = "Bang, {Ji Young} and Thomas R{\"o}sch and Kim, {Hyungjin Myra} and Shyam Thakkar and {Robalino Gonzaga}, Ernesto and Benjamin Tharian and Sumant Inamdar and Lee, {Linda S} and Patrick Yachimski and Priya Jamidar and Thiruvengadam Muniraj and Christopher DiMaio and Nikhil Kumta and Amrita Sethi and Peter Draganov and Dennis Yang and Talal Seoud and Abhilash Perisetti and Gayatri Bondi and Sachin Kirtane and Robert Hawes and Wilcox, {C Mel} and Richard Kozarek and Reddy, {D Nageshwar} and Shyam Varadarajulu",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/den.13856",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "822--828",
journal = "DIGEST ENDOSC",
issn = "0915-5635",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes

AU - Bang, Ji Young

AU - Rösch, Thomas

AU - Kim, Hyungjin Myra

AU - Thakkar, Shyam

AU - Robalino Gonzaga, Ernesto

AU - Tharian, Benjamin

AU - Inamdar, Sumant

AU - Lee, Linda S

AU - Yachimski, Patrick

AU - Jamidar, Priya

AU - Muniraj, Thiruvengadam

AU - DiMaio, Christopher

AU - Kumta, Nikhil

AU - Sethi, Amrita

AU - Draganov, Peter

AU - Yang, Dennis

AU - Seoud, Talal

AU - Perisetti, Abhilash

AU - Bondi, Gayatri

AU - Kirtane, Sachin

AU - Hawes, Robert

AU - Wilcox, C Mel

AU - Kozarek, Richard

AU - Reddy, D Nageshwar

AU - Varadarajulu, Shyam

N1 - © 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: While single-use and detachable-tip duodenoscopes have been recently developed to overcome risks of infection transmission, there are no reliable tools to objectively assess their technical performance. We evaluated the reliability and validity of a newly developed tool to assess the technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes.METHODS: An assessment tool was developed to measure duodenoscope performance based on three distinct criteria: maneuverability, mechanical/imaging characteristics and ability to perform requisite interventions. The assessment tool was tested prospectively on duodenoscopes used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures at nine academic medical centers over a 6-month period. The main outcome was reliability of the duodenoscope assessment tool, which was estimated using Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α). The secondary outcome was validity of the assessment tool.RESULTS: The assessment tool evaluated technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes in 1080 ERCP procedures. Indications were biliary in 92.8% and pancreatic in 7.2% procedures. The overall Cronbach's coefficient α for maneuverability was 0.81, assessment of mechanical/imaging characteristics was 0.92, and ability to perform requisite interventions was 0.87. On multiple linear regression analysis, prolonged procedure duration, older patient age and pancreatic interventions were significantly positively associated with higher (worse) scores.CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed assessment tool appears reliable and valid for evaluating the technical performance of duodenoscopes. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004533.

AB - OBJECTIVE: While single-use and detachable-tip duodenoscopes have been recently developed to overcome risks of infection transmission, there are no reliable tools to objectively assess their technical performance. We evaluated the reliability and validity of a newly developed tool to assess the technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes.METHODS: An assessment tool was developed to measure duodenoscope performance based on three distinct criteria: maneuverability, mechanical/imaging characteristics and ability to perform requisite interventions. The assessment tool was tested prospectively on duodenoscopes used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures at nine academic medical centers over a 6-month period. The main outcome was reliability of the duodenoscope assessment tool, which was estimated using Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α). The secondary outcome was validity of the assessment tool.RESULTS: The assessment tool evaluated technical performance of reusable duodenoscopes in 1080 ERCP procedures. Indications were biliary in 92.8% and pancreatic in 7.2% procedures. The overall Cronbach's coefficient α for maneuverability was 0.81, assessment of mechanical/imaging characteristics was 0.92, and ability to perform requisite interventions was 0.87. On multiple linear regression analysis, prolonged procedure duration, older patient age and pancreatic interventions were significantly positively associated with higher (worse) scores.CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed assessment tool appears reliable and valid for evaluating the technical performance of duodenoscopes. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004533.

U2 - 10.1111/den.13856

DO - 10.1111/den.13856

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33007136

VL - 33

SP - 822

EP - 828

JO - DIGEST ENDOSC

JF - DIGEST ENDOSC

SN - 0915-5635

IS - 5

ER -