Promotion of preneoplastic foci in rat liver with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a defined mixture of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.

Standard

Promotion of preneoplastic foci in rat liver with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a defined mixture of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. / Schrenk, D; Buchmann, A; Dietz, K; Lipp, H P; Brunner, H; Sirma, Hüseyin; Münzel, P; Hagenmaier, H; Gebhardt, R; Bock, K W.

In: CARCINOGENESIS, Vol. 15, No. 3, 3, 1994, p. 509-515.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e5b3d6cd72654a66929ed95debb8fe0a,
title = "Promotion of preneoplastic foci in rat liver with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a defined mixture of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.",
abstract = "In a two-stage initiation-promotion experiment the hypothesis was investigated that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) equivalents (TE), calculated from data of CYP1A induction in hepatocytes in primary culture, or international TCDD equivalents (ITE) are useful for evaluating the tumor-promoting potency of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) and of a defined mixture (M2) of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) in comparison with TCDD. Therefore, female Wistar rats were treated with an initiating dose of N-nitrosomorpholine, and subsequently received daily doses of 2, 20 and 200 ng TCDD/kg or equivalent doses of HpCDD or M2, based on TE values. After a promotion phase of 13 weeks, hepatic PCDD levels, CYP1A activity and the relative hepatic volume of adenosinetriphosphatase-negative or glutathione S-transferase P-positive preneoplastic foci were determined. After logarithmic transformation, linear PCDD level-response relationships were obtained for induction of CYP1A activity with TCDD, HpCDD or M2. Based on TE values, inducing potencies of both HpCDD and M2 were over-estimated at higher doses, whereas induction was approximately equivalent at the lowest dose. The best fit of PCDD level-response relationships of relative hepatic volumes of preneoplastic lesions was achieved using a four-parameter logistic model. Significantly different functions were calculated for promotion with TCDD or HpCDD. It is concluded that (i) different PCDD level-response relationships exist for the induction of hepatic CYP1A activity and the promotion of preneoplastic liver foci, and (ii) that TE or ITE factors provide only a rough estimate of the tumor-promoting potency of a PCDD mixture but may overestimate the risk from exposure to higher-chlorinated 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners such as HpCDD.",
author = "D Schrenk and A Buchmann and K Dietz and Lipp, {H P} and H Brunner and H{\"u}seyin Sirma and P M{\"u}nzel and H Hagenmaier and R Gebhardt and Bock, {K W}",
year = "1994",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "15",
pages = "509--515",
journal = "CARCINOGENESIS",
issn = "0143-3334",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promotion of preneoplastic foci in rat liver with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a defined mixture of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.

AU - Schrenk, D

AU - Buchmann, A

AU - Dietz, K

AU - Lipp, H P

AU - Brunner, H

AU - Sirma, Hüseyin

AU - Münzel, P

AU - Hagenmaier, H

AU - Gebhardt, R

AU - Bock, K W

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - In a two-stage initiation-promotion experiment the hypothesis was investigated that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) equivalents (TE), calculated from data of CYP1A induction in hepatocytes in primary culture, or international TCDD equivalents (ITE) are useful for evaluating the tumor-promoting potency of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) and of a defined mixture (M2) of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) in comparison with TCDD. Therefore, female Wistar rats were treated with an initiating dose of N-nitrosomorpholine, and subsequently received daily doses of 2, 20 and 200 ng TCDD/kg or equivalent doses of HpCDD or M2, based on TE values. After a promotion phase of 13 weeks, hepatic PCDD levels, CYP1A activity and the relative hepatic volume of adenosinetriphosphatase-negative or glutathione S-transferase P-positive preneoplastic foci were determined. After logarithmic transformation, linear PCDD level-response relationships were obtained for induction of CYP1A activity with TCDD, HpCDD or M2. Based on TE values, inducing potencies of both HpCDD and M2 were over-estimated at higher doses, whereas induction was approximately equivalent at the lowest dose. The best fit of PCDD level-response relationships of relative hepatic volumes of preneoplastic lesions was achieved using a four-parameter logistic model. Significantly different functions were calculated for promotion with TCDD or HpCDD. It is concluded that (i) different PCDD level-response relationships exist for the induction of hepatic CYP1A activity and the promotion of preneoplastic liver foci, and (ii) that TE or ITE factors provide only a rough estimate of the tumor-promoting potency of a PCDD mixture but may overestimate the risk from exposure to higher-chlorinated 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners such as HpCDD.

AB - In a two-stage initiation-promotion experiment the hypothesis was investigated that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) equivalents (TE), calculated from data of CYP1A induction in hepatocytes in primary culture, or international TCDD equivalents (ITE) are useful for evaluating the tumor-promoting potency of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) and of a defined mixture (M2) of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) in comparison with TCDD. Therefore, female Wistar rats were treated with an initiating dose of N-nitrosomorpholine, and subsequently received daily doses of 2, 20 and 200 ng TCDD/kg or equivalent doses of HpCDD or M2, based on TE values. After a promotion phase of 13 weeks, hepatic PCDD levels, CYP1A activity and the relative hepatic volume of adenosinetriphosphatase-negative or glutathione S-transferase P-positive preneoplastic foci were determined. After logarithmic transformation, linear PCDD level-response relationships were obtained for induction of CYP1A activity with TCDD, HpCDD or M2. Based on TE values, inducing potencies of both HpCDD and M2 were over-estimated at higher doses, whereas induction was approximately equivalent at the lowest dose. The best fit of PCDD level-response relationships of relative hepatic volumes of preneoplastic lesions was achieved using a four-parameter logistic model. Significantly different functions were calculated for promotion with TCDD or HpCDD. It is concluded that (i) different PCDD level-response relationships exist for the induction of hepatic CYP1A activity and the promotion of preneoplastic liver foci, and (ii) that TE or ITE factors provide only a rough estimate of the tumor-promoting potency of a PCDD mixture but may overestimate the risk from exposure to higher-chlorinated 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners such as HpCDD.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 15

SP - 509

EP - 515

JO - CARCINOGENESIS

JF - CARCINOGENESIS

SN - 0143-3334

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -