Preliminary data of a HAMD-17 validated symptom scale derived from the ICD-10 to diagnose depression in outpatients

Standard

Preliminary data of a HAMD-17 validated symptom scale derived from the ICD-10 to diagnose depression in outpatients. / Melzer, Jörg; Rostock, Matthias; Brignoli, Reto; Keck, Martin E; Saller, Reinhard.

In: FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, p. 191-6.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c699d659a9034cf9a8de90f001a9bd35,
title = "Preliminary data of a HAMD-17 validated symptom scale derived from the ICD-10 to diagnose depression in outpatients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In outpatient settings diagnostic classification of depressive symptoms is mostly descriptive based on ICD-10. Depending on clinical experience and consultation time, diagnosis can be verified by validated scales. However, physicians working in primary care are familiar with ICD-10 criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility of the validation of an ICD-10-derived symptom scale for depression.METHODS: For this preliminary trial we generated a symptom scale derived 1:1 from the diagnostic criteria for depression given in the ICD-10 with 10 items. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) was used as reference in a population of 226 outpatients suffering from depressive symptoms. Correlation between scales as well as sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 scale were calculated.RESULTS: The generated ICD-10 symptom scale for depression could be analyzed in 219 patients and showed a significant and strong correlation with the HAMD-17 (p < 0.0001; ρ = 0.75). The best tradeoffs between specificity and sensitivity of the ICD-10 score were found at 10 points for the lower and 14 points for the upper cut-off. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 76.7 and 88.6%. Almost two thirds (i.e. 65.3%) of the patients were correctly classified by the ICD-10 scale.CONCLUSION: The ICD-10 symptom scale examined in the current population was found to have fair correlation with the HAMD-17 as well as, in face of the limited variance of the patients' condition, acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, this preliminary study showed that the ICD-10-derived symptom scale seems appropriate to be investigated in a thorough validation trial.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Cooperative Behavior, Depressive Disorder/classification, Depressive Disorder, Major/classification, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, International Classification of Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data, Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics as Topic, Young Adult",
author = "J{\"o}rg Melzer and Matthias Rostock and Reto Brignoli and Keck, {Martin E} and Reinhard Saller",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1159/000342018",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "191--6",
journal = "FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED",
issn = "1661-4119",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary data of a HAMD-17 validated symptom scale derived from the ICD-10 to diagnose depression in outpatients

AU - Melzer, Jörg

AU - Rostock, Matthias

AU - Brignoli, Reto

AU - Keck, Martin E

AU - Saller, Reinhard

N1 - Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - BACKGROUND: In outpatient settings diagnostic classification of depressive symptoms is mostly descriptive based on ICD-10. Depending on clinical experience and consultation time, diagnosis can be verified by validated scales. However, physicians working in primary care are familiar with ICD-10 criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility of the validation of an ICD-10-derived symptom scale for depression.METHODS: For this preliminary trial we generated a symptom scale derived 1:1 from the diagnostic criteria for depression given in the ICD-10 with 10 items. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) was used as reference in a population of 226 outpatients suffering from depressive symptoms. Correlation between scales as well as sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 scale were calculated.RESULTS: The generated ICD-10 symptom scale for depression could be analyzed in 219 patients and showed a significant and strong correlation with the HAMD-17 (p < 0.0001; ρ = 0.75). The best tradeoffs between specificity and sensitivity of the ICD-10 score were found at 10 points for the lower and 14 points for the upper cut-off. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 76.7 and 88.6%. Almost two thirds (i.e. 65.3%) of the patients were correctly classified by the ICD-10 scale.CONCLUSION: The ICD-10 symptom scale examined in the current population was found to have fair correlation with the HAMD-17 as well as, in face of the limited variance of the patients' condition, acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, this preliminary study showed that the ICD-10-derived symptom scale seems appropriate to be investigated in a thorough validation trial.

AB - BACKGROUND: In outpatient settings diagnostic classification of depressive symptoms is mostly descriptive based on ICD-10. Depending on clinical experience and consultation time, diagnosis can be verified by validated scales. However, physicians working in primary care are familiar with ICD-10 criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility of the validation of an ICD-10-derived symptom scale for depression.METHODS: For this preliminary trial we generated a symptom scale derived 1:1 from the diagnostic criteria for depression given in the ICD-10 with 10 items. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) was used as reference in a population of 226 outpatients suffering from depressive symptoms. Correlation between scales as well as sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-10 scale were calculated.RESULTS: The generated ICD-10 symptom scale for depression could be analyzed in 219 patients and showed a significant and strong correlation with the HAMD-17 (p < 0.0001; ρ = 0.75). The best tradeoffs between specificity and sensitivity of the ICD-10 score were found at 10 points for the lower and 14 points for the upper cut-off. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 76.7 and 88.6%. Almost two thirds (i.e. 65.3%) of the patients were correctly classified by the ICD-10 scale.CONCLUSION: The ICD-10 symptom scale examined in the current population was found to have fair correlation with the HAMD-17 as well as, in face of the limited variance of the patients' condition, acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, this preliminary study showed that the ICD-10-derived symptom scale seems appropriate to be investigated in a thorough validation trial.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Ambulatory Care

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Depressive Disorder/classification

KW - Depressive Disorder, Major/classification

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Interdisciplinary Communication

KW - International Classification of Diseases

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data

KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data

KW - Reference Values

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Statistics as Topic

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1159/000342018

DO - 10.1159/000342018

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22964985

VL - 19

SP - 191

EP - 196

JO - FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED

JF - FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED

SN - 1661-4119

IS - 4

ER -