Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study

Standard

Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study. / Funcke, Sandra; Sander, Michael; Goepfert, Matthias S; Groesdonk, Heinrich; Heringlake, Matthias; Hirsch, Jan; Kluge, Stefan; Krenn, Claus; Maggiorini, Marco; Meybohm, Patrick; Salzwedel, Cornelie; Saugel, Bernd; Wagenpfeil, Gudrun; Wagenpfeil, Stefan; Reuter, Daniel A; ICU-CardioMan Investigators.

In: ANN INTENSIVE CARE, Vol. 6, 12.2016, p. 49.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Funcke, S, Sander, M, Goepfert, MS, Groesdonk, H, Heringlake, M, Hirsch, J, Kluge, S, Krenn, C, Maggiorini, M, Meybohm, P, Salzwedel, C, Saugel, B, Wagenpfeil, G, Wagenpfeil, S, Reuter, DA & ICU-CardioMan Investigators 2016, 'Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study', ANN INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 6, pp. 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0148-2

APA

Funcke, S., Sander, M., Goepfert, M. S., Groesdonk, H., Heringlake, M., Hirsch, J., Kluge, S., Krenn, C., Maggiorini, M., Meybohm, P., Salzwedel, C., Saugel, B., Wagenpfeil, G., Wagenpfeil, S., Reuter, D. A., & ICU-CardioMan Investigators (2016). Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study. ANN INTENSIVE CARE, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0148-2

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{86b925169df946ebb21be821ce33555a,
title = "Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability is frequent and outcome-relevant in critical illness. The understanding of complex hemodynamic disturbances and their monitoring and management plays an important role in treatment of intensive care patients. An increasing number of treatment recommendations and guidelines in intensive care medicine emphasize hemodynamic goals, which go beyond the measurement of blood pressures. Yet, it is not known to which extent the infrastructural prerequisites for extended hemodynamic monitoring are given in intensive care units (ICUs) and how hemodynamic management is performed in clinical practice. Further, it is still unclear which factors trigger the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.METHODS: In this multicenter, 1-day (November 7, 2013, and the preceding 24 h) cross-sectional study, we retrieved data on patient monitoring from ICUs in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland by means of a web-based case report form. One hundred and sixty-one intensive care units contributed detailed information on availability of hemodynamic monitoring. In addition, detailed information on hemodynamic monitoring of 1789 patients that were treated on due date was collected, and independent factors triggering the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring were identified by multivariate analysis.RESULTS: Besides basic monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry, and blood pressure monitoring, the majority of patients received invasive arterial (77.9 %) and central venous catheterization (55.2 %). All over, additional extended hemodynamic monitoring for assessment of cardiac output was only performed in 12.3 % of patients, while echocardiographic examination was used in only 1.9 %. The strongest independent predictors for the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring of any kind were mechanical ventilation, the need for catecholamine therapy, and treatment backed by protocols. In 71.6 % of patients in whom extended hemodynamic monitoring was added during the study period, this extension led to changes in treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Extended hemodynamic monitoring, which goes beyond the measurement of blood pressures, to date plays a minor role in the surveillance of critically ill patients in German, Austrian, and Swiss ICUs. This includes also consensus-based recommended diagnostic and monitoring applications, such as echocardiography and cardiac output monitoring. Mechanical ventilation, the use of catecholamines, and treatment backed by protocol could be identified as factors independently associated with higher use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Sandra Funcke and Michael Sander and Goepfert, {Matthias S} and Heinrich Groesdonk and Matthias Heringlake and Jan Hirsch and Stefan Kluge and Claus Krenn and Marco Maggiorini and Patrick Meybohm and Cornelie Salzwedel and Bernd Saugel and Gudrun Wagenpfeil and Stefan Wagenpfeil and Reuter, {Daniel A} and {ICU-CardioMan Investigators}",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1186/s13613-016-0148-2",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "49",
journal = "ANN INTENSIVE CARE",
issn = "2110-5820",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag GmbH and Co. KG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan Study

AU - Funcke, Sandra

AU - Sander, Michael

AU - Goepfert, Matthias S

AU - Groesdonk, Heinrich

AU - Heringlake, Matthias

AU - Hirsch, Jan

AU - Kluge, Stefan

AU - Krenn, Claus

AU - Maggiorini, Marco

AU - Meybohm, Patrick

AU - Salzwedel, Cornelie

AU - Saugel, Bernd

AU - Wagenpfeil, Gudrun

AU - Wagenpfeil, Stefan

AU - Reuter, Daniel A

AU - ICU-CardioMan Investigators

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability is frequent and outcome-relevant in critical illness. The understanding of complex hemodynamic disturbances and their monitoring and management plays an important role in treatment of intensive care patients. An increasing number of treatment recommendations and guidelines in intensive care medicine emphasize hemodynamic goals, which go beyond the measurement of blood pressures. Yet, it is not known to which extent the infrastructural prerequisites for extended hemodynamic monitoring are given in intensive care units (ICUs) and how hemodynamic management is performed in clinical practice. Further, it is still unclear which factors trigger the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.METHODS: In this multicenter, 1-day (November 7, 2013, and the preceding 24 h) cross-sectional study, we retrieved data on patient monitoring from ICUs in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland by means of a web-based case report form. One hundred and sixty-one intensive care units contributed detailed information on availability of hemodynamic monitoring. In addition, detailed information on hemodynamic monitoring of 1789 patients that were treated on due date was collected, and independent factors triggering the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring were identified by multivariate analysis.RESULTS: Besides basic monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry, and blood pressure monitoring, the majority of patients received invasive arterial (77.9 %) and central venous catheterization (55.2 %). All over, additional extended hemodynamic monitoring for assessment of cardiac output was only performed in 12.3 % of patients, while echocardiographic examination was used in only 1.9 %. The strongest independent predictors for the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring of any kind were mechanical ventilation, the need for catecholamine therapy, and treatment backed by protocols. In 71.6 % of patients in whom extended hemodynamic monitoring was added during the study period, this extension led to changes in treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Extended hemodynamic monitoring, which goes beyond the measurement of blood pressures, to date plays a minor role in the surveillance of critically ill patients in German, Austrian, and Swiss ICUs. This includes also consensus-based recommended diagnostic and monitoring applications, such as echocardiography and cardiac output monitoring. Mechanical ventilation, the use of catecholamines, and treatment backed by protocol could be identified as factors independently associated with higher use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.

AB - BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability is frequent and outcome-relevant in critical illness. The understanding of complex hemodynamic disturbances and their monitoring and management plays an important role in treatment of intensive care patients. An increasing number of treatment recommendations and guidelines in intensive care medicine emphasize hemodynamic goals, which go beyond the measurement of blood pressures. Yet, it is not known to which extent the infrastructural prerequisites for extended hemodynamic monitoring are given in intensive care units (ICUs) and how hemodynamic management is performed in clinical practice. Further, it is still unclear which factors trigger the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.METHODS: In this multicenter, 1-day (November 7, 2013, and the preceding 24 h) cross-sectional study, we retrieved data on patient monitoring from ICUs in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland by means of a web-based case report form. One hundred and sixty-one intensive care units contributed detailed information on availability of hemodynamic monitoring. In addition, detailed information on hemodynamic monitoring of 1789 patients that were treated on due date was collected, and independent factors triggering the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring were identified by multivariate analysis.RESULTS: Besides basic monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry, and blood pressure monitoring, the majority of patients received invasive arterial (77.9 %) and central venous catheterization (55.2 %). All over, additional extended hemodynamic monitoring for assessment of cardiac output was only performed in 12.3 % of patients, while echocardiographic examination was used in only 1.9 %. The strongest independent predictors for the use of extended hemodynamic monitoring of any kind were mechanical ventilation, the need for catecholamine therapy, and treatment backed by protocols. In 71.6 % of patients in whom extended hemodynamic monitoring was added during the study period, this extension led to changes in treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Extended hemodynamic monitoring, which goes beyond the measurement of blood pressures, to date plays a minor role in the surveillance of critically ill patients in German, Austrian, and Swiss ICUs. This includes also consensus-based recommended diagnostic and monitoring applications, such as echocardiography and cardiac output monitoring. Mechanical ventilation, the use of catecholamines, and treatment backed by protocol could be identified as factors independently associated with higher use of extended hemodynamic monitoring.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1186/s13613-016-0148-2

DO - 10.1186/s13613-016-0148-2

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27246463

VL - 6

SP - 49

JO - ANN INTENSIVE CARE

JF - ANN INTENSIVE CARE

SN - 2110-5820

ER -