Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Standard

Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. / Lau, Emily S; Braunwald, Eugene; Murphy, Sabina A; Wiviott, Stephen D; Bonaca, Marc P; Husted, Steen; James, Stefan K; Wallentin, Lars; Clemmensen, Peter; Roe, Matthew T; Ohman, E Magnus; Harrington, Robert A; Mega, Jessica L; Bhatt, Deepak L; Sabatine, Marc S; O'Donoghue, Michelle L.

In: J AM COLL CARDIOL, Vol. 69, No. 12, 28.03.2017, p. 1549-1559.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lau, ES, Braunwald, E, Murphy, SA, Wiviott, SD, Bonaca, MP, Husted, S, James, SK, Wallentin, L, Clemmensen, P, Roe, MT, Ohman, EM, Harrington, RA, Mega, JL, Bhatt, DL, Sabatine, MS & O'Donoghue, ML 2017, 'Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials', J AM COLL CARDIOL, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1549-1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028

APA

Lau, E. S., Braunwald, E., Murphy, S. A., Wiviott, S. D., Bonaca, M. P., Husted, S., James, S. K., Wallentin, L., Clemmensen, P., Roe, M. T., Ohman, E. M., Harrington, R. A., Mega, J. L., Bhatt, D. L., Sabatine, M. S., & O'Donoghue, M. L. (2017). Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J AM COLL CARDIOL, 69(12), 1549-1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c07d5ed4754e4bf489f11155806e70bd,
title = "Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Sex-specific differences in response to antiplatelet therapies have been described. Whether women and men derive comparable benefit from intensification of antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain.OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease.METHODS: A collaborative sex-specific meta-analysis was conducted of phase III or IV randomized trials of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, and intravenous cangrelor. Seven trials were included that enrolled a total of 24,494 women and 63,346 men. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the primary endpoint for each trial.RESULTS: Potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 14% in women (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94) and by 15% in men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.90; p interaction = 0.93). Treatment reduced the risk of myocardial infarction by 13% in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96) and 16% in men (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.91; p interaction = 0.65), and the risk of stent thrombosis by 51% in women (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.65) and 41% in men (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; p interaction = 0.85). Directional consistency was seen for cardiovascular death in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.01) and men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95; p interaction = 0.86). The potent P2Y12 inhibitors increased major bleeding in women (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.88) and men (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.07; p interaction = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: In randomized trials, the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors were comparable between men and women. Given these data, sex should not influence patient selection for the administration of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.",
keywords = "Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sex Characteristics, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Lau, {Emily S} and Eugene Braunwald and Murphy, {Sabina A} and Wiviott, {Stephen D} and Bonaca, {Marc P} and Steen Husted and James, {Stefan K} and Lars Wallentin and Peter Clemmensen and Roe, {Matthew T} and Ohman, {E Magnus} and Harrington, {Robert A} and Mega, {Jessica L} and Bhatt, {Deepak L} and Sabatine, {Marc S} and O'Donoghue, {Michelle L}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "1549--1559",
journal = "J AM COLL CARDIOL",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

AU - Lau, Emily S

AU - Braunwald, Eugene

AU - Murphy, Sabina A

AU - Wiviott, Stephen D

AU - Bonaca, Marc P

AU - Husted, Steen

AU - James, Stefan K

AU - Wallentin, Lars

AU - Clemmensen, Peter

AU - Roe, Matthew T

AU - Ohman, E Magnus

AU - Harrington, Robert A

AU - Mega, Jessica L

AU - Bhatt, Deepak L

AU - Sabatine, Marc S

AU - O'Donoghue, Michelle L

N1 - Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/3/28

Y1 - 2017/3/28

N2 - BACKGROUND: Sex-specific differences in response to antiplatelet therapies have been described. Whether women and men derive comparable benefit from intensification of antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain.OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease.METHODS: A collaborative sex-specific meta-analysis was conducted of phase III or IV randomized trials of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, and intravenous cangrelor. Seven trials were included that enrolled a total of 24,494 women and 63,346 men. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the primary endpoint for each trial.RESULTS: Potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 14% in women (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94) and by 15% in men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.90; p interaction = 0.93). Treatment reduced the risk of myocardial infarction by 13% in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96) and 16% in men (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.91; p interaction = 0.65), and the risk of stent thrombosis by 51% in women (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.65) and 41% in men (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; p interaction = 0.85). Directional consistency was seen for cardiovascular death in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.01) and men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95; p interaction = 0.86). The potent P2Y12 inhibitors increased major bleeding in women (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.88) and men (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.07; p interaction = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: In randomized trials, the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors were comparable between men and women. Given these data, sex should not influence patient selection for the administration of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

AB - BACKGROUND: Sex-specific differences in response to antiplatelet therapies have been described. Whether women and men derive comparable benefit from intensification of antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain.OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease.METHODS: A collaborative sex-specific meta-analysis was conducted of phase III or IV randomized trials of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, and intravenous cangrelor. Seven trials were included that enrolled a total of 24,494 women and 63,346 men. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the primary endpoint for each trial.RESULTS: Potent P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 14% in women (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.94) and by 15% in men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.90; p interaction = 0.93). Treatment reduced the risk of myocardial infarction by 13% in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96) and 16% in men (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.91; p interaction = 0.65), and the risk of stent thrombosis by 51% in women (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.65) and 41% in men (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; p interaction = 0.85). Directional consistency was seen for cardiovascular death in women (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.01) and men (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95; p interaction = 0.86). The potent P2Y12 inhibitors increased major bleeding in women (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.88) and men (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.07; p interaction = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: In randomized trials, the efficacy and safety of the potent P2Y12 inhibitors were comparable between men and women. Given these data, sex should not influence patient selection for the administration of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

KW - Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Sex Characteristics

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.028

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28335837

VL - 69

SP - 1549

EP - 1559

JO - J AM COLL CARDIOL

JF - J AM COLL CARDIOL

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 12

ER -