Phytodolor® in musculoskeletal disorders: re-analysis and meta-analysis

Standard

Phytodolor® in musculoskeletal disorders: re-analysis and meta-analysis. / Uehleke, Bernhard; Brignoli, Reto; Rostock, Matthias; Saller, Reinhard; Melzer, Jörg.

In: FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2011, p. 249-56.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7ffda0ce31264abd9912c35fb23c6386,
title = "Phytodolor{\textregistered} in musculoskeletal disorders: re-analysis and meta-analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Treatment of rheumatic or musculoskeletal disorders (MD) is multi-disciplinary and includes herbal analgesics. Although already reviewed, no quantitative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the herbal combination Phytodolor{\textregistered} (STW1) is available.METHODS: We searched in databases and contacted authors and the manufacturer to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining STW1 in patients with MD. We made a reanalysis of raw data of eligible published and unpublished RCTs and pooled the results for meta-analysis according to Cochrane guidelines and intention-to-treat. Primary outcome measure was patient global assessment of efficacy, secondary outcome measure was pain at rest and on movement. Results were stratified according to treatment groups.RESULTS: Patient data of 11 RCTs were eligible for pooling. In the entire population, STW1 was significantly superior compared to placebo in patients' global assessment of efficacy (group difference for rating very good/good: 20%; placebo 48.9% and STW1 69.1%; p < 0.001; OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.65) and in the subpopulation 'other rheumatic diseases' (placebo 45.4%; STW1 72.3%; p < 0.001; OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.2-0.52), but not in the subpopulation 'gonarthrosis'. STW1 did not differ significantly compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), neither in the entire population nor the subpopulations. Similar results were found for pain at rest and on movement. No serious adverse events (AE) but minor AE were reported (placebo 8.1%; STW1 14.2%; NSAIDs 18.9%).CONCLUSION: According to the analysed data, STW1 showed a better pain reduction than placebo in patients with pain due to MD, probably equivalent to NSAIDs, and was well tolerated.",
keywords = "Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases/drug therapy, Pain/drug therapy, Plant Extracts/therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic",
author = "Bernhard Uehleke and Reto Brignoli and Matthias Rostock and Reinhard Saller and J{\"o}rg Melzer",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1159/000332820",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "249--56",
journal = "FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED",
issn = "1661-4119",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phytodolor® in musculoskeletal disorders: re-analysis and meta-analysis

AU - Uehleke, Bernhard

AU - Brignoli, Reto

AU - Rostock, Matthias

AU - Saller, Reinhard

AU - Melzer, Jörg

N1 - Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - BACKGROUND: Treatment of rheumatic or musculoskeletal disorders (MD) is multi-disciplinary and includes herbal analgesics. Although already reviewed, no quantitative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the herbal combination Phytodolor® (STW1) is available.METHODS: We searched in databases and contacted authors and the manufacturer to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining STW1 in patients with MD. We made a reanalysis of raw data of eligible published and unpublished RCTs and pooled the results for meta-analysis according to Cochrane guidelines and intention-to-treat. Primary outcome measure was patient global assessment of efficacy, secondary outcome measure was pain at rest and on movement. Results were stratified according to treatment groups.RESULTS: Patient data of 11 RCTs were eligible for pooling. In the entire population, STW1 was significantly superior compared to placebo in patients' global assessment of efficacy (group difference for rating very good/good: 20%; placebo 48.9% and STW1 69.1%; p < 0.001; OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.65) and in the subpopulation 'other rheumatic diseases' (placebo 45.4%; STW1 72.3%; p < 0.001; OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.2-0.52), but not in the subpopulation 'gonarthrosis'. STW1 did not differ significantly compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), neither in the entire population nor the subpopulations. Similar results were found for pain at rest and on movement. No serious adverse events (AE) but minor AE were reported (placebo 8.1%; STW1 14.2%; NSAIDs 18.9%).CONCLUSION: According to the analysed data, STW1 showed a better pain reduction than placebo in patients with pain due to MD, probably equivalent to NSAIDs, and was well tolerated.

AB - BACKGROUND: Treatment of rheumatic or musculoskeletal disorders (MD) is multi-disciplinary and includes herbal analgesics. Although already reviewed, no quantitative evaluation of efficacy and safety of the herbal combination Phytodolor® (STW1) is available.METHODS: We searched in databases and contacted authors and the manufacturer to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining STW1 in patients with MD. We made a reanalysis of raw data of eligible published and unpublished RCTs and pooled the results for meta-analysis according to Cochrane guidelines and intention-to-treat. Primary outcome measure was patient global assessment of efficacy, secondary outcome measure was pain at rest and on movement. Results were stratified according to treatment groups.RESULTS: Patient data of 11 RCTs were eligible for pooling. In the entire population, STW1 was significantly superior compared to placebo in patients' global assessment of efficacy (group difference for rating very good/good: 20%; placebo 48.9% and STW1 69.1%; p < 0.001; OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.65) and in the subpopulation 'other rheumatic diseases' (placebo 45.4%; STW1 72.3%; p < 0.001; OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.2-0.52), but not in the subpopulation 'gonarthrosis'. STW1 did not differ significantly compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), neither in the entire population nor the subpopulations. Similar results were found for pain at rest and on movement. No serious adverse events (AE) but minor AE were reported (placebo 8.1%; STW1 14.2%; NSAIDs 18.9%).CONCLUSION: According to the analysed data, STW1 showed a better pain reduction than placebo in patients with pain due to MD, probably equivalent to NSAIDs, and was well tolerated.

KW - Aged

KW - Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use

KW - Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Musculoskeletal Diseases/drug therapy

KW - Pain/drug therapy

KW - Plant Extracts/therapeutic use

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

U2 - 10.1159/000332820

DO - 10.1159/000332820

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22105037

VL - 18

SP - 249

EP - 256

JO - FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED

JF - FORSCH KOMPLEMENTMED

SN - 1661-4119

IS - 5

ER -