Physiotherapy management of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP): A systematic review

Standard

Physiotherapy management of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP): A systematic review. / Klotz, Susanne G R; Schön, Mila; Ketels, Gesche; Löwe, Bernd; Brünahl, Christian A.

In: PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 516-532.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5d2cca1a5eec4ce8aa758d934fd161fa,
title = "Physiotherapy management of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP): A systematic review",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common pain condition. However, treatment remains challenging. Musculoskeletal findings are frequent; therefore physiotherapy might be helpful. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on physiotherapy in patients with CPP (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016037516).METHODS: Six databases were searched and additional hand searches were performed. Two reviewers independently conducted the database search and selected studies using a two-step approach. The methodological quality was assessed applying the Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included. Trigger point therapy was examined in four studies; two of which were randomized controlled trials. All studies indicate a significant change in pain measurement. The other four studies evaluated the effect of biofeedback, Thiele massage, Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy and aerobic exercises, whereas the last two were tested in controlled trials. All studies showed significant improvements in pain assessment.CONCLUSIONS: The evidence currently available is sparse with methodological flaws, making it difficult to recommend a specific physiotherapy option. There is an urgent need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to identify the most effective physiotherapy management strategy for patients with CPP.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Klotz, {Susanne G R} and Mila Sch{\"o}n and Gesche Ketels and Bernd L{\"o}we and Br{\"u}nahl, {Christian A}",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1080/09593985.2018.1455251",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "516--532",
journal = "PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR",
issn = "0959-3985",
publisher = "informa healthcare",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiotherapy management of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP): A systematic review

AU - Klotz, Susanne G R

AU - Schön, Mila

AU - Ketels, Gesche

AU - Löwe, Bernd

AU - Brünahl, Christian A

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common pain condition. However, treatment remains challenging. Musculoskeletal findings are frequent; therefore physiotherapy might be helpful. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on physiotherapy in patients with CPP (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016037516).METHODS: Six databases were searched and additional hand searches were performed. Two reviewers independently conducted the database search and selected studies using a two-step approach. The methodological quality was assessed applying the Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included. Trigger point therapy was examined in four studies; two of which were randomized controlled trials. All studies indicate a significant change in pain measurement. The other four studies evaluated the effect of biofeedback, Thiele massage, Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy and aerobic exercises, whereas the last two were tested in controlled trials. All studies showed significant improvements in pain assessment.CONCLUSIONS: The evidence currently available is sparse with methodological flaws, making it difficult to recommend a specific physiotherapy option. There is an urgent need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to identify the most effective physiotherapy management strategy for patients with CPP.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common pain condition. However, treatment remains challenging. Musculoskeletal findings are frequent; therefore physiotherapy might be helpful. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the current evidence on physiotherapy in patients with CPP (PROSPERO registration number CRD42016037516).METHODS: Six databases were searched and additional hand searches were performed. Two reviewers independently conducted the database search and selected studies using a two-step approach. The methodological quality was assessed applying the Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included. Trigger point therapy was examined in four studies; two of which were randomized controlled trials. All studies indicate a significant change in pain measurement. The other four studies evaluated the effect of biofeedback, Thiele massage, Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy and aerobic exercises, whereas the last two were tested in controlled trials. All studies showed significant improvements in pain assessment.CONCLUSIONS: The evidence currently available is sparse with methodological flaws, making it difficult to recommend a specific physiotherapy option. There is an urgent need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to identify the most effective physiotherapy management strategy for patients with CPP.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1080/09593985.2018.1455251

DO - 10.1080/09593985.2018.1455251

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29589778

VL - 35

SP - 516

EP - 532

JO - PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR

JF - PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR

SN - 0959-3985

IS - 6

ER -